Jump to content

2015 AFL National Draft prospects: The next batch

Featured Replies

Couldn't see any mention of him but Kieran Lovell, relative of Andy starred on the weekend for Tasmania racking up 42 disposals.Described as a nuggety inside midfielder who has been likened to Fremantle's Lachie Neale, was Tassie's best. Some footage can be found on the AFL website Eyecatchers where they go on to say that he is a smart footballer, accumulative taking 10 marks, 4 clearances and 19 handball receives.

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2015-06-23/u18s-academy-guns-shine

 
  • Author

There was very little change to the top 20 on TAC Cup Future Stars

1. Gold Coast - Joshua Schache

2. Brisbane - Jacob Weitering

3. Carlton - Aaron Francis

4. GWS* - Jacob Hopper

5. Sydney* - Callum Mills

6. Melbourne - Harley Balic

7. St. Kilda - Rhys Mathieson

8. Essendon - Darcy Parish

9. Port Adelaide - Harry McKay

10. North Melbourne - Luke Partington

11. Geelong - Charlie Curnow

12. Western Bulldogs - Sam Weideman

13. Adelaide - Darcy Tucker

14. Richmond - Kieran Collins

15. Collingwood - Josh Dunkley

16. Hawthorn - Riley Bonner

17. West Coast - Callum Ah Chee

18. Fremantle - Jade Gresham

19. Brisbane* - Eric Hipwood

20. Brisbane* - Ben Keays

* Academy bid

He's flown under the radar a bit because of Weitering, but I think Collins is a very bankable prospect.

He is massive for a kid a his age, but it's not why he's good either.

Looks a ready made Truck Rutten to me.

 

Keep watching this kid. He is Simon Black & Joel Selwood combined. MFC needs Darcy Tucker

This one's for you Normie:


http://boundforglorynews.com/the-new-bidding-system-implications-for-the-2015-draft/

Hope this linked worked.

Gives a good run down on the new bidding system.

Sorry if someone else has brought it up and this seemed like the right topic to put it in.

A good article. I knew the basics already. But its good to see some real examples.

I really wanted to know about the use of future picks which they didn't go into.

I'm thoroughly underwhelmed by Tucker.

Surely for a pick as early as we'll have, in a weak draft no less, you want a pure mid, not a bloke who plays off the HBF.

Sure, he's learning to go into the middle, but why hasn't he been playing as a mid at some level all along?

It worries me, and I don't see any exceptional attributes in the kid - just a solid all-rounder that has limited midfield experience.

Having said that, I'm underwhelmed by Schache too.

Looks a lot like David Hale to me.

Not a great deal of aggression or competitiveness and looks a bit slow tbh.

I'd have Parish, Weidemann or Kieran Collins before both.

I'm thoroughly underwhelmed by Tucker.

Surely for a pick as early as we'll have, in a weak draft no less, you want a pure mid, not a bloke who plays off the HBF.

Sure, he's learning to go into the middle, but why hasn't he been playing as a mid at some level all along?

It worries me, and I don't see any exceptional attributes in the kid - just a solid all-rounder that has limited midfield experience.

Having said that, I'm underwhelmed by Schache too.

Looks a lot like David Hale to me.

Not a great deal of aggression or competitiveness and looks a bit slow tbh.

I'd have Parish, Weidemann or Kieran Collins before both.

I'd have the same reservations on Tucker.

I'm higher on Schache, I think his tank is very good and he looks like he gets decent separation on his opponent at this level. His set shot kicking is a thing of beauty and he spots up target's well around the ground. There are parts of his group game that remind me of Joe Daniher (not his kicking, not as athletic). The caveat with him is that the best underage key defenders play for Vic Country, so Murray vs Dandenong will probably inform us better on him than Vic Country vs Metro. Fair to say he doesn't have Hogan levels of aggression and competitiveness.

For all that, if I had to choose at pick 1, Weitering would be my choice. He does have the competitive streak and his one on one stuff looks stronger than Schache's.

 

Don't mind Charlie Curnow who I think will slide so would not be adverse to us trading down our pick to the mid to late teens

Don't mind Charlie Curnow who I think will slide so would not be adverse to us trading down our pick to the mid to late teens

I'm very keen to see more of Curnow play. The (very) limited footage I've seen has been quite exciting and he's still highly regarded by some clubs despite his injury and lack of exposure this year.

If we were picking at 5 right now (and Parish was off the board), I'd be thinking very hard about selecting Curnow here.


There was very little change to the top 20 on TAC Cup Future Stars

1. Gold Coast - Joshua Schache

2. Brisbane - Jacob Weitering

3. Carlton - Aaron Francis

4. GWS* - Jacob Hopper

5. Sydney* - Callum Mills

6. Melbourne - Harley Balic

7. St. Kilda - Rhys Mathieson

8. Essendon - Darcy Parish

9. Port Adelaide - Harry McKay

10. North Melbourne - Luke Partington

11. Geelong - Charlie Curnow

12. Western Bulldogs - Sam Weideman

13. Adelaide - Darcy Tucker

14. Richmond - Kieran Collins

15. Collingwood - Josh Dunkley

16. Hawthorn - Riley Bonner

17. West Coast - Callum Ah Chee

18. Fremantle - Jade Gresham

19. Brisbane* - Eric Hipwood

20. Brisbane* - Ben Keays

* Academy bid

really hope we can somehow snare Weideman in the draft trading machinations, as our 2nd pick, mid 1st Rnd somewhere.

Jade Gresham for mine!

I'm thoroughly underwhelmed by Tucker.

Surely for a pick as early as we'll have, in a weak draft no less, you want a pure mid, not a bloke who plays off the HBF.

Sure, he's learning to go into the middle, but why hasn't he been playing as a mid at some level all along?

It worries me, and I don't see any exceptional attributes in the kid - just a solid all-rounder that has limited midfield experience.

Having said that, I'm underwhelmed by Schache too.

Looks a lot like David Hale to me.

Not a great deal of aggression or competitiveness and looks a bit slow tbh.

I'd have Parish, Weidemann or Kieran Collins before both.

Have to agree re Tucker. Others appear to be passing him by. Hope/ think that Parish may slide to us.


Is there a Wines, Dustin Martin type in the top ten?

Not quite mate. The best contested players are attached to GWS & Sydney. I don't have Mathieson at Wines' level, and he certainly doesn't have Dusty Martin's explosive traits and kicking ability. Looking very much like a draft for kpp's.

Callum Moore impressed again tonight.

Not quite mate. The best contested players are attached to GWS & Sydney. I don't have Mathieson at Wines' level, and he certainly doesn't have Dusty Martin's explosive traits and kicking ability. Looking very much like a draft for kpp's.

Oh, in that case, we'll just take Hogan MKII.

Oh, in that case, we'll just take Hogan MKII.

I'm hoping for Clark Keating Mk11

& bit like the older David Schwarz, key position & 2nd ruck. crash bash.

could Weideman grow into a role like this?


Is there a Wines, Dustin Martin type in the top ten?

Wines, Martin and Brayshaw - all dual sided. That is why they are so damn good.

Because they are effective on both sides of the body, they also spread either side, it really opens the game up for them.

I haven't seen any player this year in that mould.

MFC is well positioned in the draft, we either take the best KP who slips through the net - given that KPs are touted top 3 picks (Schache, Weitering and Francis), or.. We instead decide to take the best mid in the draft - whoever that may be. Personally, I would take the best KP early, then take Lovell - or Gresham if he slipped - with our next pick.

Wines, Martin and Brayshaw - all dual sided. That is why they are so damn good.

Martin is definitely not dual sided. I was at the game against the Eagles and he had to check-side kicks from 50 because he didn't want to go on his left.

Wines I haven't watched enough of to know but I think Brayshaw would have to be one of the most fluent kicks on either side that I have seen at such a young age.

Wines, Martin and Brayshaw - all dual sided. That is why they are so damn good.

Because they are effective on both sides of the body, they also spread either side, it really opens the game up for them.

I haven't seen any player this year in that mould.

MFC is well positioned in the draft, we either take the best KP who slips through the net - given that KPs are touted top 3 picks (Schache, Weitering and Francis), or.. We instead decide to take the best mid in the draft - whoever that may be. Personally, I would take the best KP early, then take Lovell - or Gresham if he slipped - with our next pick.

Wines and Martin are not dual sided. They spread hard because they are smart footballers and work hard.
 

Martin is definitely not dual sided. I was at the game against the Eagles and he had to check-side kicks from 50 because he didn't want to go on his left.

Wines I haven't watched enough of to know but I think Brayshaw would have to be one of the most fluent kicks on either side that I have seen at such a young age.

If Martin check sided on his dominate foot, it has more to do with the angle - and less to do with his competency on his opposite foot.

If Martin check sided on his dominate foot, it has more to do with the angle - and less to do with his competency on his opposite foot.

I really doubt this. I'd recommend watching the footage again if you can.

One of them he rolled through for a goal which was fairly lucky. The second one dropped well short straight to an Eagles player.

Without a doubt Brayshaw is much better on his opposite foot (whichever that is), Martin is more explosive though.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 23 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies