Jump to content

Jayden Laverde

Featured Replies

 

Fair enough but they aren't throwing up quality midfield options.

Laverde who is a utility who could be a midfielder in the future.

Both haven't played a lot in the midfield let alone dominated that position. No exposed form to say they'll be what people project.

Thats what they where saying about Bontempelli last year.

McCartin's highlights video was very average. He looks a very ordinary players in his highlights package. Laverde on the other hand appears to be quite exciting. He looks like a cross between Lynden Dunn and Jeremy Howe. He takes the opponent on like Dunn used to when he was younger and played forward but has some ability to take a mark like Howe, although he does not seem to get up as high as Howe. I like the look of Laverde and Brayshaw as the best 2 players in the draft, along with Petracca. Wright looked like a Sam Jacobs type who I think would be better than McCartin. Lever looked interesting but not as exciting as Laverde and not as good a contested player.

 

Very ordinary players don't have hands as clean as McCartin, and they certainly aren't as good below their knees.

They don't kick 20 goals in 5 games playing at 70% fitness.

They don't draw comparisons with a young Roughead.

We'll be getting a fantastic talent if we pick McCartin.


Let's look at the draft profiles:-

Paige Cardona has him going at 5 to Collingwood

If collingwood get another Pendlebury

Who is stupid enough to compare McCartin to Roughead??!

Don't throw the word "stupid" around when you're... well you.

Who is stupid enough to compare McCartin to Roughead??!

McCartin is 194cm and 96kg. Roughead is 193cm and 100kg. So very similar physically. McCartin apparently has the versatility to play at centre half forward or on a flank which he has done as a junior. McCartin looks more of the full forward mould but supposedly has a few more strings to his bow.

 

McCartin is 194cm and 96kg. Roughead is 193cm and 100kg. So very similar physically. McCartin apparently has the versatility to play at centre half forward or on a flank which he has done as a junior. McCartin looks more of the full forward mould but supposedly has a few more strings to his bow.

That may be all well and good.

But goal kicking is a WEAKNESS of his and he's a fulltime forward. Not just technique. But mentality. That's not something that I'm cool with if we're looking to draft a fulltime one-dimensional forward.

Kicking goals should be up there with his stronger attributes. But it's not. And its a worry.

Roughhead is a brilliant field and goal kick. Which is what makes him such a great player. If Roughead couldn't kick, he'd be half the player he is now.

You've compared their weight and height as players. What other footballing attributes do they share?

Roughead's greatest asset is his football IQ and his ability to play through the middle.

I've seen nothing to suggest McCartin has any of these qualities.

In fact, he looks like he'd have been a star 25 years ago, but in today's game I'm not so sure.


That may be all well and good.

But goal kicking is a WEAKNESS of his and he's a fulltime forward. Not just technique. But mentality. That's not something that I'm cool with if we're looking to draft a fulltime one-dimensional forward.

Kicking goals should be up there with his stronger attributes. But it's not. And its a worry.

Roughhead is a brilliant field and goal kick. Which is what makes him such a great player. If Roughead couldn't kick, he'd be half the player he is now.

You've compared their weight and height as players. What other footballing attributes do they share?

The comparison wasn't made by me personally so I won't try to defend it further because I don't need to. I merely referenced it: http://www.krockfootball.com.au/falcon-draws-roughead-comparisons/

I do think it's unfair to be comparing football IQs at the relative stages of their careers, and he has plenty of time to be working on his set shot technique so it might be a worry of sorts but not a major one for mine.

To be quite frank, I'm going to go with the weight of professional opinion on McCartin's value ahead of most if not all posters on here. If there's a credible review that doesn't rate him, from someone whose followed him closely, I'm open to reading it.

Have you read it? The one drawing comparisons to Roughead, one of the leading KPFs in the game, is none other than Mick Turner, the Falcons' resident hype machine.

Due to the source, it can be summarily dismissed.

Have you read it? The one drawing comparisons to Roughead, one of the leading KPFs in the game, is none other than Mick Turner, the Falcons' resident hype machine.

Due to the source, it can be summarily dismissed.

Yes Mach. Everyone is stupid, has an agenda etc. I know the deal.

I agree McCartin LOOKS the traditional FF and his field kicking doesn't look fantastic. But of all players to choose from to compare, he picks Roughy. It's interesting if nothing else and maybe, just maybe, he isn't as one dimensional as first thought.

Roughead's greatest asset is his football IQ and his ability to play through the middle.

I've seen nothing to suggest McCartin has any of these qualities.

In fact, he looks like he'd have been a star 25 years ago, but in today's game I'm not so sure.

How many games have you seen McCartin play?

Even if he's a spud we will have greatest development coach in the universe in the great McCartney and he will singlehandedly turn him into a superstar like every player he is going to develop.

Honestly, every pick is a punt when they are teenagers...


Honestly, every pick is a punt when they are teenagers...

You would hope there is some science to it but more likely mixed with a bit of magic dust and more than a touch of luck to get the right result.

Just getting back to Laverde for a moment...

One thing I didn't notice was any defensive pressure. He looks exciting but he will need to run two ways in the big league as Sam Blease has just found out. Anyone know if this is an issue for him?

You would hope there is some science to it but more likely mixed with a bit of magic dust and more than a touch of luck to get the right result.

I think the industry is getting better at finding the best 50 players in every junior year, but of those 50 blokes - clubs still find it tough to differentiate the top players when they are 22 and until we raise the age of eligibility - it won't change.

I don't know if other years have been like this at the top - we have Petracca and Brayshaw that look solid from all accounts, then we have a type-1 diabetic CHF who has some massive raps but a few question marks, we have a HFF that might make a great mid, and a good CHB who might make a great mid but he has been out for a year with a ACL.

And these are the players we are 'allowed' to pick from because The Consensus has deemed them better than the rest of the 50 blokes that might be better than them when they are 22...

Honestly, every pick is a punt when they are teenagers...

I reckon every kick should be a punt, but maybe I've just dropped the ball!

McCartin is 194cm and 96kg. Roughead is 193cm and 100kg. So very similar physically. McCartin apparently has the versatility to play at centre half forward or on a flank which he has done as a junior. McCartin looks more of the full forward mould but supposedly has a few more strings to his bow.

well if we do take a key tall forward, IO we better make sure he has the engine to play CHF as well as FF, & also be able to go down back.

his engine will be crucial I would have thought. We Do not need any one dimensional key talls who can't play other positions.


well if we do take a key tall forward, IO we better make sure he has the engine to play CHF as well as FF, & also be able to go down back.

his engine will be crucial I would have thought. We Do not need any one dimensional key talls who can't play other positions.

What a bizarre post.

Hawkins, Walker, Tippett, J Brown, Gunston, Riewoldt, Cloke, Kennedy are all stay at home forwards who have reasonable records!

Why do we need him to be able to go down back?

It's terrific if midfielders and flankers have some versatility but key forwards and key defenders you want them to be a master of their trade rather than a jack of a couple.

It's like saying in cricket we need our bowlers to be able to bat as well - no! Pick your best batsmen to bat and your best bowlers to bowl and if you've got one genuine all-rounder in the side then brilliant.

How many genuine quality swingmen are there in the league? Probably only Carlisle. To say a key forward needs to be able to go down back to be worth drafting is absurd.

What a bizarre post.

Hawkins, Walker, Tippett, J Brown, Gunston, Riewoldt, Cloke, Kennedy are all stay at home forwards who have reasonable records!

Why do we need him to be able to go down back?

It's terrific if midfielders and flankers have some versatility but key forwards and key defenders you want them to be a master of their trade rather than a jack of a couple.

It's like saying in cricket we need our bowlers to be able to bat as well - no! Pick your best batsmen to bat and your best bowlers to bowl and if you've got one genuine all-rounder in the side then brilliant.

How many genuine quality swingmen are there in the league? Probably only Carlisle. To say a key forward needs to be able to go down back to be worth drafting is absurd.

I'd be happy to have Walker, JBrown, Gunston, NRiewoldt, to play any key position along the spine. So if McCartin has the poise & agility & smarts of these 4 guys, then he's a must... but I don't share your passion for him atmo.

I think Wright is more skilled than McCartin, but does he have the mojo to take on the big guys? Is McCartin the real McCoy, or a McSpud ?

Well that's good, now having seen his highlights I reckon we should take Brayshaw with 2 and if available Petracca, McCartin, Lever and Laverde with pick 3.

Can we take 4 players with one pick?

 

Well that's good, now having seen his highlights I reckon we should take Brayshaw with 2 and if available Petracca, McCartin, Lever and Laverde with pick 3.

Can we take 4 players with one pick?

If we had our PP 'Redleg' we would almost make it...

Short-sighted and ignorant comment.

Nice.

Really genius?

Hardly short sighted and quite factual. The only ignorance would be your response.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Fremantle

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons return to the MCG wounded, undermanned and desperate. Still searching for their first win of the season, Melbourne faces a daunting task against the Fremantle Dockers. With key pillars missing at both ends of the ground, the Dees must find a way to rise above the adversity and ignite their season before it slips way beyond reach. Will today be the spark that turns it all around, or are we staring down the barrel of a 0–6 start?

    • 2 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Fremantle

    A month is a long time in AFL football. The proof of this is in the current state of the two teams contesting against each other early this Saturday afternoon at the MCG. It’s hard to fathom that when Melbourne and Fremantle kicked off the 2025 season, the former looked like being a major player in this year’s competition after it came close to beating one of the favourites in the GWS Giants while the latter was smashed by Geelong to the tune of 78 points and looked like rubbish. Fast forward to today and the Demons are low on confidence and appear panic stricken as their winless streak heads towards an even half dozen and pressure mounts on the coach and team leadership.  Meanwhile, the Dockers have recovered their composure and now sit in the top eight. They are definitely on the up and up and look most likely winners this weekend against a team which they have recently dominated and which struggles to find enough passages to the goals to trouble the scorers. And with that, Fremantle will head to the MCG, feeling very good about itself after demolishing Richmond in the Barossa Valley with Josh Treacy coming off a six goal haul and facing up to a Melbourne defence already without Jake Lever and a shaky Steven May needing to pass a fitness test just to make it onto the field of play. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 06

    The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 199 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 63 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
    • 477 replies
    Demonland