Jump to content

The captaincy. Who do we want?

Featured Replies

4 captains

Jack Grimes (Defenders). Col Garland (LG), James Frawley (LG), McDonald, Pedersen, Dunn, Strauss, Terlich, Clisby, Jetta, Nicholson. Coach - Jade Rawlings

Nathan Jones (Inside mids/rucks), Bernie Vince (?LG), Viney, Tyson, Michie, McKenzie, Magner, Jamar, Spencer, Gawn - Coach - Ben Matthews

Jack Trengove (Outside mids), Watts, Toumpas, Evans, Taggert, Blease, Barry, Bail, Matt Jones. Coach - George Stone

Chris Dawes (Forwards), Mitch Clark (LG), Hogan, Byrnes, Fitzy, Kent, Howe, Tapscott. Coach - Daniel McPherson

A very simple system based on chain of command. Each captain has 10 or so guys he is primarily responsible for. Rotate the games to share the media work which really just puff anyway. Share the burden for on field leadership. I fear nothing more than our one consistent player in Jones taking the weight of the captaincy as well as getting tagged each week whilst Grimes and Trengove become disillusioned by having the captaincy removed and it all becomes a bigger mess.

4 captains is controversial. But the AFL is a team game and a great captain can drag a team a little way but only if that player is a great player first. Until we get a Carey, Judd, Jobe Watson or Gary Ablett I see no point for trying to make a lesser player achieve something he can't.

 

Luke Hodge!

Are you planning to join the Dawks again OD?

 

Are you planning to join the Dawks again OD?

No TBF just saying who I would like as captain.

You look at who we have to pick from then look at the Premiers.

A gulf Exists . When we have as good a player as Hodge to consider we will be going somewhere.

There is not one player on our list that comes close.

No TBF just saying who I would like as captain.

You look at who we have to pick from then look at the Premiers.

A gulf Exists . When we have as good a player as Hodge to consider we will be going somewhere.

There is not one player on our list that comes close.

Whats wrong with picking a good public speaker who can not player due to injury as Captain?

TBH there is only a few players I actual respect in the current list and no stand out Captains come to mind.


Whats wrong with picking a good public speaker who can not player due to injury as Captain?

TBH there is only a few players I actual respect in the current list and no stand out Captains come to mind.

A lot. On field leadership is still a vital part of football and all team sports. Our young players who go into their shell when things go bad, who are they meant to follow?

And what about around the club where a guy not even playing becomes spokesman, which is not his job.

And without a proper captain or captains who do the players follow? Do they form their own groups?

That's why my plan is for multiple captains spread through the playing group. Each captain has a direct responsibility to a select proportion of the list. Each one of those players at least plays the right way with the right work rate. And trains the right way. And I'm hoping the 4 of them can perform as we all hope they can at least individually in 2014.

Whats wrong with picking a good public speaker who can not player due to injury as Captain?

TBH there is only a few players I actual respect in the current list and no stand out Captains come to mind.

I rest my case your honour!

A lot. On field leadership is still a vital part of football and all team sports. Our young players who go into their shell when things go bad, who are they meant to follow?

And what about around the club where a guy not even playing becomes spokesman, which is not his job.

And without a proper captain or captains who do the players follow? Do they form their own groups?

That's why my plan is for multiple captains spread through the playing group. Each captain has a direct responsibility to a select proportion of the list. Each one of those players at least plays the right way with the right work rate. And trains the right way. And I'm hoping the 4 of them can perform as we all hope they can at least individually in 2014.

Now I would really be annoyed if the Club pick more then one Captain as it shows they don't trust anyone to lead. IMO it the worst decision by any Club to have two or more Captains. Pick one and support him. If needed have a number of Vice Captains instead,

The main leadership should come from the coaches, especially the million dollar man, Mr Roos.

 

4 captains

Jack Grimes (Defenders). Col Garland (LG), James Frawley (LG), McDonald, Pedersen, Dunn, Strauss, Terlich, Clisby, Jetta, Nicholson. Coach - Jade Rawlings

Nathan Jones (Inside mids/rucks), Bernie Vince (?LG), Viney, Tyson, Michie, McKenzie, Magner, Jamar, Spencer, Gawn - Coach - Ben Matthews

Jack Trengove (Outside mids), Watts, Toumpas, Evans, Taggert, Blease, Barry, Bail, Matt Jones. Coach - George Stone

Chris Dawes (Forwards), Mitch Clark (LG), Hogan, Byrnes, Fitzy, Kent, Howe, Tapscott. Coach - Daniel McPherson

A very simple system based on chain of command. Each captain has 10 or so guys he is primarily responsible for. Rotate the games to share the media work which really just puff anyway. Share the burden for on field leadership. I fear nothing more than our one consistent player in Jones taking the weight of the captaincy as well as getting tagged each week whilst Grimes and Trengove become disillusioned by having the captaincy removed and it all becomes a bigger mess.

4 captains is controversial. But the AFL is a team game and a great captain can drag a team a little way but only if that player is a great player first. Until we get a Carey, Judd, Jobe Watson or Gary Ablett I see no point for trying to make a lesser player achieve something he can't.

Interesting approach. What would you think about an overall Captain and then four vice-captains to take on the roles you have suggested?

4 captains

Jack Grimes (Defenders). Col Garland (LG), James Frawley (LG), McDonald, Pedersen, Dunn, Strauss, Terlich, Clisby, Jetta, Nicholson. Coach - Jade Rawlings

Nathan Jones (Inside mids/rucks), Bernie Vince (?LG), Viney, Tyson, Michie, McKenzie, Magner, Jamar, Spencer, Gawn - Coach - Ben Matthews

Jack Trengove (Outside mids), Watts, Toumpas, Evans, Taggert, Blease, Barry, Bail, Matt Jones. Coach - George Stone

Chris Dawes (Forwards), Mitch Clark (LG), Hogan, Byrnes, Fitzy, Kent, Howe, Tapscott. Coach - Daniel McPherson

A very simple system based on chain of command. Each captain has 10 or so guys he is primarily responsible for. Rotate the games to share the media work which really just puff anyway. Share the burden for on field leadership. I fear nothing more than our one consistent player in Jones taking the weight of the captaincy as well as getting tagged each week whilst Grimes and Trengove become disillusioned by having the captaincy removed and it all becomes a bigger mess.

4 captains is controversial. But the AFL is a team game and a great captain can drag a team a little way but only if that player is a great player first. Until we get a Carey, Judd, Jobe Watson or Gary Ablett I see no point for trying to make a lesser player achieve something he can't.

Your suggestion looks good

From My Human Resources background I evidence your "chain of command" appears based on Roman army centurion structures very relevant and still maintained in armies I believe

There have been many manpower structures used in various industries and countries over time with varying success. The latest to my knowledge are matrix structures which allow and in fact promote autonomy with communicated interaction.

I once presented a paper on "Chaos Theory Human Resources in action" as a response to organisational structural change "flat structures" which were the order of the day (remember Jeff Kennett and Chainsaw Dunlap)

Chaos theory which is a mathematical theory which is used in analysiis of everything from natural environments to Financial markets comes out at abot 3.4 something as the naturally recurring figure

I proposed and saw demonstrated many times that small groups formed naturally and acted independently and effectively. Organisations I worked in encouraged this natural formation with an emphasis on clear consistent communication to ensure organisational direction was achieved.

Never got to develop the practice or analyse fully due to many reasons but I still think it is an appropriate structure, certainly as good as many others proposed. It is certainly a proven theory.


Oh meant to say one leader Roos with functional groups as you are suggesting perhaps the leadership group members select the captain.

One of my most respected leaders had a theory that leaders emerged and we found that consistently in practice.

  • 2 weeks later...

Jones for Capt and either Grimes or Garland for VC... as someone else mentioned, reward for effort and proven leadership on a regular basis. I would think that with the ASADA cloud hanging over his head, Trengove may be out of the picture (even for the leadership group) unless some news comes out well before the start of the new season.

In total agreement there!

C---Jones

VC-Frawley

Make it harder for Chip to leave next year.

Why not just make him captain then?

Jones for Capt and either Grimes or Garland for VC... as someone else mentioned, reward for effort and proven leadership on a regular basis. I would think that with the ASADA cloud hanging over his head, Trengove may be out of the picture (even for the leadership group) unless some news comes out well before the start of the new season.

I think Jones for captain and Dawes for vice

Welcome demonjnr!

In total agreement there!

Why not just make him captain then?

Welcome demonjnr!

thank you demoneyes

Thank you to those who have spelt captain correctly, rather than captian.

Oh, btw, Nathan Jones without a shadow of doubt. Trengove to stay in the leadership group.

Captain: Nathan Jones

V/captain: Frawley, Grimes

Leadership Group: Garland, Cross, Dawes, Vince, Trengove

Was going to add Clark but I want to see him on the park for a season. Same probably said about Dawes


I would go for Jones alone because we need a durable leader and Jones has been consistently in the team and showing the leadership qualities required in this comp.

Despite Roos' history of > 1 captain, I still like one leader.

I would definitely make Nathan Jones captain and make Col Garland and Jack Grimes vice captains

Dawes is the best spokesman,Jones the first picked.

Grimes is solid enough but perhaps not consistent enough on field.

So Jack Watts with his solid physical presence and intimidating smile is the only logical choice.


Dawes is the best spokesman,Jones the first picked.

Grimes is solid enough but perhaps not consistent enough on field.

So Jack Watts with his solid physical presence and intimidating smile is the only logical choice.

Yes and with that manly beard he has the intimidating presence of the berserker about him.

Nathan Jones.

Constant effort, training professionalism and most of all ON-FIELD PERFORMANCE must be rewarded.

When someone else wins a Bluey we can start considering other possibilities.

I agree he is good on and off the field and a good leader

Agree with Jones and happy to keep Grimes as co captain.

Vice Garland and Chip - although I feel there should be a Foward in the mix, but Dawes and Mitch are always injured.

One thing I hope is that McKenzie and Byrnes are cut from the leadership group.

 

yyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

now were on the right tram

facetious is the only word in the dictionary with every vow in order

Apart from abstemious

would you believe only the 2 words

I would have Chris Dawes as Captain and Nathan Jones as Vice Captain or the other way around.

Agree, although we would need to be confident Dawes would be on the park more often than not. I don't think at the moment we can be


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 123 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies