6-Clark - by a street, marked, crumbed, chased and worked his arse off

5- Jones not as good as last week but worked hard and kicked a couple

4- Howe presented well unfortunatley needs to finish off his good work. Has been a good positive this year

3 - Morton backed up from last week looks to be gaining some confidence

2- Frawley defended well as usual but his disposal let him down otherwise could have taken 5 votes

1- Can't split Barty or Mcdoanld solid efforts

6 Clark

5 Frawley

4 Jones

3 McDonald

2 Morton

1 Moloney - 10 clearances

6. Clark

5. Frawley

4. Jones

3. Morton

2. McDonald

1. Howe

Clark - worth every cent we paid...football world knows nothing if they think we paid overs.......

Jones

Morton

Frawley

Tmac

Howe

6 - Clark

5 - Frawley

4 - Jones

3 - Moloney

2 - Morton

1 - McDonald

6. Clark

5. Jones

4. Howe

3. Moloney

2. Morton

1. Frawley

Because Garland is solely responsible for all the supply Johnson got. I really thought Garland's attacking game was fairly good.

No Garland was not solely responsible. But giving him votes for doing a fairly good job on Steve Johnson is not correct.

6 clark

5 frawley

4 jones

3 Morton

2 McDonald

6. Clarke

6. Clarke

6. Clarke

You guys are surely taking the Pi55 !

Mitch CLARK wasn't born with an "e" on the end. So show some respect.

ox_5 ? C'mon. That's not like you.

Otherwise spot on with the votes...

6. Clark

5. Jamar (see note below)

4. Frawley

3. Morton

2. Jones

1. Grimes

Note: It seems to me when Jamar is being rested we are really struggling. I have no problem with Sellar's effort, but he's just not up to it. How many times did we see Jamar on the ground after the tap getting the ball out? and how many for Sellar?

Standings after Round 6

66 Nathan Jones

46 Mitch Clark

45 James Magner

33 Jared Rivers

30 Jeremy Howe

26 Matthew Bate

24 Jack Watts

21 James Frawley

17 Cale Morton

16 Jordie McKenzie

15 Jack Trengove

7 Clint Bartram Jack Grimes

6 Rohan Bail Tom McDonald

4 Stef Martin

3 Joel Macdonald Brent Moloney

2 Lynden Dunn

1 Aaron Davey

Clark

Jones

McDonald

Howe

Bate

Garland

You guys are surely taking the Pi55 !

Mitch CLARK wasn't born with an "e" on the end. So show some respect.

ox_5 ? C'mon. That's not like you.

Otherwise spot on with the votes...

I apologise HT! I have no idea what happened, and I have edited my post to correct it.

It pi55es me off more than most, and I made the fatal error. No excuses, but I am going to blame doing it on my iPhone and not actually thinking.

Morton in 9th and improving. How many would've picked that two months ago?

Morton in 9th and improving. How many would've picked that two months ago?

Me.

I didn't see the game - but i am pleased to see that Tom McD is again seen by many as doing well.

QUESTION: Does anyone feel that he is ready to be moved forward yet, or should he probably play even most of this season at CHB??

He seems to me to have the physique and the aggression to fill our long under performed CHF role.

I didn't see the game - but i am pleased to see that Tom McD is again seen by many as doing well.

QUESTION: Does anyone feel that he is ready to be moved forward yet, or should he probably play even most of this season at CHB??

He seems to me to have the physique and the aggression to fill our long under performed CHF role.

I'd keep him at CHB. We have an undersized backline in that we don't have anyone else above about 193cm. Sellar may have been recruited to play on the monster forwards but has been playing relief ruck and forward. I doubt he (Sellar) will succeed in any position (although I admire his effort). With Clark and eventually Watts forward, I don't think we need him (McDonald) there.

Also, the forward line isn't really a problem at the moment. It does quite well when the ball actually gets down there.

Reason for edit: clarifying who the pronoun's are for

Edited May 8, 201213 yr by La Dee-vina Comedia