Queanbeyan Demon

only because our bloke hasn't a clue.

Robbie Flower's book was a good read.

Um . . . it's relevant to the thread topic. Goodwin time and again has shown his ineptitude at the selection table. There is a reasonable chance it will happen.

Seriously right? Over on their FB page, they are ropeable about the umpiring.

If Goodloss has his way, Harley misses.

Melbourne - little has changed. Gawn - loose without him. Goodloss - will be delusional.

If we can’t beat Melbourne then the season doesn’t look promising. Lol May. He's absolutely melting under pressure. Pretty good considering we gave them 8 goals from awful use out of def 50. Should've beaten those muppets. Played against Melbourne and the umpires tonight. Another reality check, still a bottom 4 side. Gawn just tapped it to Melbourne mids at will out of the middle. Forini is comfortably worst on ground. Lazy and [censored] weak. Gawn is an awesome player, but seriously Witts is ******** aweful. Melbourne playing like a team that has had the media riding and questioning them all week. This mob has it all over us. Credit to Dees, we were trying to scratch it out but Dees pressure was awesome. Their effort was great. They just kept kicking out to Gawn and he kept marking it. Need to at least contest better. Dude (Max) is a weapon. This is looking like 2019 all over again.

I'm a film maker. Everything written in the article is accurate IMHO. It goes without saying on 'Land that the game is appallingly covered by the broadcasters and commentary is horrific. Try explaining the game to an American just from what's shown on the television. It's impossible. Now go to the ground and explain it during play. Immediate understanding. It beggars believe that channel 7 have tried to bring us 'sounds of the game' (i.e. a player miked up on the ground) and the player doesn't say anything. This is a worthwhile innovation, but requires the player to verbalise his/her thought patterns while playing the game. Imagine a player 'sneaking out the back' as the play is unfolding up the field and hearing their commentary instead of Bruce and Taylor taking pot-shots at each other? It'd be brilliant, but the AFL is just not interested in innovation. Never has been. Pathetic really. Secondly, why arn't players and umpires fitted with cameras? The AFL played around with this some years ago and dropped it. It all became just too hard I suspect. It would have involved thinking to really make it work. Imagine a struggle in the goal square shot in 4K from the goal umpire's viewpoint with accompanying audio? Thirdly, get rid of commentary as we currently understand it. Wire all players, runners, doctors, trainers and umpires with audio and find the world's best sound engineers and sense-makers and put them in the control box. Their mandate is to bring us the best audio feeds that explains the game from the participant's perspective as it's unfolding. We'd know why Jonathon Patton is distressed rather than commentators speculating for 15 minutes and being 100 miles off the mark. Unfortunately, this type of innovation is unlikely to happen. When left to their own devices, the AFL (and particularly the players' thinking) and the broadcasters move at snails pace.

Trawl Demonland for answers.

(This aged extremely well.)

There is a chance Clarkson will be politely asked to 'retire' by the Dawks at about the same time Goodloss is out of contract. If he was gettable in 2022 . . . do we want him?

Clearly do not understand footy.

This is unclear. Could you please be more succinct Jumbo?

Who's getting the cash down at Glenferrie Road? They are almost like us in 2012. There must be very ordinary players on good coin.

Commentators going on and on about the Dawk's inconsistency. Well, what do you expect when the side is packed with inconsistent b-graders that other clubs were happy to off-load? I can't understand why Dawkthorn have escaped media scrutiny. They've treaded water for five years. They don't have one a-grader (with the possible exception of Sicily) in the club that they've bought through from drafting for 10 years. They are in deep long-term trouble IMHO.

Frawley is incredible one dimensional. Beaten in a one-on-one by a good ordinary battler just now. Frost his usual headless chock impression.

Frawley and Frost doing well.

This is easily the thread of the year so far. Brilliant work everyone, and an elephant stamp for you Chookrat.

Why Melbourne are a Dee-sappointment - and what they should do next

Agree with pretty much everything that's been said here. I'll say one thing though, Lyon and Derm didn't say anything that hasn't been said on this forum for months by well credential-led judges in a much more coherent manner. Well done 'Landers.

This 101%.

This is my story.

Our lowest moments since the Filth stole a Granny in 1958 against us. Ranked in order of disappointments. What’s your call? 1. 1987 2. 1988 3. 2000 4. 2020 5. 1994 6. 1976 7. 1971 8. 1965 9. 1979 10. 2011 If this post has triggered painful memories: Lifeline 13 11 14 Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636 Black Dog Institute: (02) 9382 4530

Gawn - Still learning leadership Viney - Mindless repeat offender Hibbert - Best game recently May - Does not lead Fritsch - Protects his spot Oliver - Clearly uncoachable player Petracca - Goodwin's only positive Salem - What went wrong? Brayshaw - Lazy, careless, comatose Hannan - Glen Iris interchange Langdon - Who, where, what? Harmes - Viney the second vandenBerg - Good at Ainslie Tomlinson - Giant's win trade McDonald - Captain of reserves Pickett - Too inexperienced ATM Lockhart - Battler and limited Lever - 11th game back Rivers - Worth persisting with Smith - Oh deary me Melksham - One good year Hunt - Little boy lost