layzie

Until I spell something wrong, yes.

How about 51% loading and 49% mental 😛

Franchises or organisations. Whichever fits.

The stuff coming out of this gets worse and worse. It's a disgrace that this was allowed to occur. The bottom fell out the year after and it seems these players, loyal servants of the club are scarred. What a joke.

Can't find anything official but various articles say it's been gone for 5 years now. My mistake.

I assumed so until I did a search straight after and couldn't find didly on Salary Cap rules. If anyone can that would be much appreciated.

Dunno, would he be earning that much? Would probably be on the veteran's list too so they save there.

Very much alive and well! Warehouse is in Truganina, supplied their office furniture 😁

It's an ole fashioned Slobberknocker JR!

Sensational work all round there, will give him a follow!

Like breaking even in the clearances we just need to break even with the supporter ratio.

Let's ramp it up to Demania levels!

"This is an arm, drawn by nobody. It is worth nothing.."

For all intensive purposes ❌ For all intents and purposes ✔️

Of course, just seems strange that those are the standards.

They did, very true. There's been a lot of great examples out there. I think what I meant with my original comment is that it never seems to be in the week to week discussion of the experts as to the effects that loading can have on a team's performance. For instance with relentless pressure running and spreading in a game. If a team was way off in that area, instead of bringing it up as a possible factor like we do and Binman has numerous times, they usually just criticise the lack of effort and say it needs to be better etc. I'd be hard pressed to find an episode of say First Crack this year where Kingy, Joey and whoever else has just once raised this topic or even considered it as a factor for a team's performance.

Perfect 'loading game' that one as well.

Without reading yet does his last name start with 'G' and end in 'oodwin'?

When were the Scott comments again A F? I've either missed them or forgotten. I think I mean more so from the pundits, the so called experts who ask the questions about the form slump and then try to answer with analysis. Your Kings, Montagnas, Lloyds etc

Consider it done!

This has been the closest anyone in the media has come to discussing the topic of loading.

How could anyone say he isn't one? Crazy.

BF in a nutshell..

I like the question. I do feel that Jack would be undoubtedly more prepared and better in the role the second time round but having Max as the sole skipper seems to be working a treat for the moment. He's the spiritual leader for me and you don't need the title to be that.

Certainly sounds like a forward that likes to get involved.