Gawn - more Brownlow votes

Salem - outstanding four quarters

Viney - prolific without dominating

Oliver - valuable connection game

Petty - good without opponent

Pickett - unusually poor disposals

Rivers - was always steady

Fritsch - performance of old

Bowey - classic backman’s game

Chandler - praiseworthy second half

van Rooyen - had some involvement

Culley - a noteworthy debut

Sparrow - regularly poor disposals

Langford - impressive both ends

Windsor - enjoyed centre involvement

Langdon - wasn’t often sighted

Turner - May’s heir apparent

Howes - safe and composed

Melksham - had limited involvement

McDonald - deserves another year

McVee - had little involvement

Sharp - had no influence

Good summary Joeboy, Sharp didn’t get much time but helped set up a goal soon after coming on.

Petracca??

35 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - more Brownlow votes

Salem - outstanding four quarters

Viney - prolific without dominating

Oliver - valuable connection game

Petty - good without opponent

Pickett - unusually poor disposals

Rivers - was always steady

Fritsch - performance of old

Bowey - classic backman’s game

Chandler - praiseworthy second half

van Rooyen - had some involvement

Culley - a noteworthy debut

Sparrow - regularly poor disposals

Langford - impressive both ends

Windsor - enjoyed centre involvement

Langdon - wasn’t often sighted

Turner - May’s heir apparent

Howes - safe and composed

Melksham - had limited involvement

McDonald - deserves another year

McVee - had little involvement

Sharp - had no influence

Petracca - seemingly coasted along

Salem - two dumb 50 metres

Petty - took 3 contested marks so must have had an opponent at some stages

We played Northern Bullants

Sorry for the 4 words…. 🥴

58 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Gawn - more Brownlow votes

Salem - outstanding four quarters

Viney - prolific without dominating

Oliver - valuable connection game

Petty - good without opponent

Pickett - unusually poor disposals

Rivers - was always steady

Fritsch - performance of old

Bowey - classic backman’s game

Chandler - praiseworthy second half

van Rooyen - had some involvement

Culley - a noteworthy debut

Sparrow - regularly poor disposals

Langford - impressive both ends

Windsor - enjoyed centre involvement

Langdon - wasn’t often sighted

Turner - May’s heir apparent

Howes - safe and composed

Melksham - had limited involvement

McDonald - deserves another year

McVee - had little involvement

Sharp - had no influence

While I haven't seen the game Joe I can only say on Tmac. Why was he out for so long. Yes another year.

21 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Petty - took 3 contested marks so must have had an opponent at some stages

I took that to mean he didn't have an opponent of any quality DubDee.

3 minutes ago, old dee said:

I took that to mean he didn't have an opponent of any quality DubDee.

Ah I see.

Same could be said for most players though

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Ah I see.

Same could be said for most players though

Yep they are hardly a quality opponent.

4 hours ago, DubDee said:

Petty - took 3 contested marks so must have had an opponent at some stages

True but sadly WC's defense struggles.

Pickett - good midfield moments

Petty - maybe a forward?

Fritsch - back at best

Culley - taller than most

Sparrow was respectable. Body on the line as always.

54 minutes ago, Dockett 32 said:

Sparrow was respectable. Body on the line as always.

Sparrow had ~80% TOG and was the 2nd lowest ranked player in the team

Turner - gone past May

3 hours ago, FireInTheBennelly said:

Turner - gone past May

A bit cheeky FTB, but Disco is on a steep upward curve that’s for sure.

On 02/08/2025 at 17:16, old dee said:

Yep they are hardly a quality opponent.

Yes, but that was their second-largest loss this year (Suns by 87).

Collingwood only beat them at Marvel by 29, Brisbane won by 19 in Brisbane. Those teams must be terrible.

5 hours ago, mauriesy said:

Yes, but that was their second-largest loss this year (Suns by 87).

Collingwood only beat them at Marvel by 29, Brisbane won by 19 in Brisbane. Those teams must be terrible.

In those games they did have some of there better players on the field who were missing yesterday. They only thing you can take from Saturday's game is we won. Anything else has to tempered by our openents or lack there of.

On 03/08/2025 at 11:46, MrFreeze said:

Sparrow had ~80% TOG and was the 2nd lowest ranked player in the team

I say this every week. Sparrow has to be playing a role. It's just not clear what it is