Jump to content

Featured Replies

Earlier on another thread , someone said :

"Tbh i think we'll be lucky to get within 5/6 goals of the Sqawkers. Could be wrong. Think we'll actually miss Viney shutting down someone today. Someone else will need to do that role. Too many not giving Hawthorn due credit imho Dees need to be awake early . Don't want to get jumped as that's catchup footy.... tiring and all too often futile. Like to see Fritter get jiggy. Be handy should Clarry have a blinder to silence his 'fan club' in the media. Roo needs to hang on to a few and find the sticks otherwise I'm not sure why he's back in tttt. Just got to make a fist of it Dees. Go Us"

And here we are..... sadly.

I think today two errors compounded.

Many gave incredulous dismissives to Hawthorn and many over rate the Dees list and ability to play decent footy consistently.

The writing was on the wall for those that can and would read.

It's still there !!

 
35 minutes ago, Dingo said:

Kossie legged in the goal square and no free??

I just saw that trip…

That Umpire should never officiate an AFL Game again

That’s akin to Cheating

2 hours ago, Disco InTurno said:

We were the better team today. They’ll finish 6th and go out in the first round of finals.

Respectfully disagree that we were the better team.

We lead for about 3 minutes of the game, Hawthorn kept responding like a good team does whenever we applied a bit of scoreboard pressure and destroyed us in the last quarter.

Sure there were some positives today, and we had them on toast at times, and Langford and XL were exciting.

 
8 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

I don’t know about you lot but that hurt. We had them on toast and played some great footy. This year becomes all about next year. Mad Dammit GIF by Melbournefc

The Pig and Mitch Brown would be handy these days.

Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

I just saw that trip…

That Umpire should never officiate an AFL Game again

That’s akin to Cheating

#freekickhawthorn #nonetomelbourne


Jefferson is probably a lovely fella, talented in VFL and local leagues for sure, I went today and didn’t even notice him except for 1 mark at the punt road end then kicked it and didn’t even score. He has about as much grunt as Schache and Weid.

Can we draft a forward with a bit of @$#t who wants to rip off their opponents head?

Langford first season and already you can tell he is a player. Kicked a nice goal and even tried to get the crowd into it with his celebration.

JVR and Jeffo are just too raw. No point potting them , they shouldn’t be our focal points at this stage.

Selwyn should be the first person sacked, not Goody. Our fitness is our biggest problem.

51 minutes ago, old dee said:

Binman! Do you now see where my negative attitude stems from? Your two CPF's had blinders again. Sorry but I could not help myself. To all those who think we have a good team need to open their eyes. We need at minimum a 2 year rebuild of our forward line. Jefferson, JVR and Fullerton will not take us into finals ever.

We also need a quality mid who can use the ball better coming inside and occasionally drift forward for the odd goal. Which we might have found in Langers although most likely will need a few more pre-seasons to be a consistent impact player here. Great start though.

But we'll also then need to replace Vines & Sparrow. Sparrow is too slow and has no other weapons except defensive effort.

And no, Rivers aint gonna make it as a mid i'm afraid. He needs to see the ball in front of him and plays so much better as a HBer.

Then there's the Maximus factor OD. He just isn't replaceable so we'll just have to aim for someone reasonable. And that aint coming from Casey either with Verral another bust alongside Jeffo.

We are at least a mini rebuild of significant proportions away from fixing the forward woes and the above. I'm thinking around 3 to 5 seasons plus a new forward line coach.

And who knows who else will still be there from the present FD by then.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

 

My take .....
Bad kicking is bad footy.
Issue has plagued us for far too long.
Good sides take their opportunities.

Also listened to Bruest after the game.
When asked what Mitchell said at 3/4 time he declared Mitchell told them they were boring.
Play fast and exciting and if they lose doing it .... So be it.
Entertain him.

I'd kill for a coach with a similar philosophy.

Edited by Fork 'em

34 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Half back flankers are some of the most important players in the modern game now.

Windsor has elite speed and skills, and is exactly the sort of player you want starting your attack from half back.

It makes perfect sense to play him in that role, especially with Lindsay and Langford now both playing the wing role so well.

Ideally yes. But we have zero spread ahead of the ball. What is the point of having sit on HB winning turnovers where he has nothing to kick to?

Bowey and Rivers behind the ball and Windsor on the HFF. Season is kaput so worth a shot.


Game was pretty indicative of where we are. Nowhere near as bad as we looked rds 2-5, but a bit of a shadow of our old self. Relying a lot on a select few guys delivering their role every single week - namely Gawn, McDonald, Melksham, Bowey, Langford, Petracca, Langford, Pickett, Chandler. When any of these guys lower their colours, like TMac in the final quarter today, nobody else seems to step up to replace them. Some real good youth who I have a lot of faith in, but equally a couple of young guys who are tilting towards busts. Jefferson and Tholstrup the obvious candidates, and whilst it breaks my heart to say because he did look good, JVR isn't far away.

Out:

Fritsch - made Sicily, the guy in the worst form of his career, look unreal. Barely even applied percieved pressure, never mind actual pressure. And I've been a defender of his.

Jefferson - absolutely nowhere near it, unfortunately.

Tholstrup - I said it when he debuted and I'll say it again - there are no clear strengths to his game. What was Taylor thinking? Hope he comes good, but he has a lot to do.

In:

Melksham - football smarts

Petty - can't believe he's the answer again, but here we are

Laurie - deserves another go

Oliver for Viney and JVR for Fullarton are both tempting changes too. Fullarton can barely play, but there's something in his and Petty's ability to stay out of eachother's way.

44 minutes ago, BDA said:

Do you mean we should have recruited better goal kickers?

Fritsch missed 2 gimmes. thats on him, not the coaches.

Our Forwards are not being Coached correctly or PREPARED correctly

Some of that is on Goodwin, and some on the FD

When have we seen improvement in our forward 50 craft since the GF??

It’s not helped by a Pathetic VFL fixture, but other Clubs have that problem and seem to function up forward, but not us

Simon’s Learnings obviously do not include the Forwardline, it has been neglected for 3 seasons

6 Goals to 3/4 time on a Sunny afternoon when “supposedly” we had them on toast…

What Rubbish

Other Coaches in the AFL would have sorted our Forwardline massive inefficiency in one preseason. This Season the problem has actually got worse, because we cannot run out 4 Quarters

Intense pressure for no rewards takes its toll…

2 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Simon is not smart enough at selection.

JVR, Jeffo and Fritta all horribly out of form yet plays all three.

The one dangerous tall that performed last week he moves down back for Petty.

Another zero goal game from Spargo and pretty sure same for Chandler. When the heat comes on and we're struggling the only small forward that stands up (when he's playing as a small forward) is Koz and he's probably gone at years end.

Kolt & Jeffo aren't ready for AFL and Jeffo is barely VFL level at this point.

JVR kicked 5 in the VFL last time out, didn't he?

Chandler also isn't a small forward. He's very clearly playing between the arcs.

16 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Respectfully disagree that we were the better team.

We lead for about 3 minutes of the game, Hawthorn kept responding like a good team does whenever we applied a bit of scoreboard pressure and destroyed us in the last quarter.

Sure there were some positives today, and we had them on toast at times, and Langford and XL were exciting.

Sanity

We have had some big outs...Viney...Petty... Milkshake....Lever.

Their getting older and injury prone. Although a concussion in there

Let's face it the club got complacent after 21 . Maybe after 21 the club got complacent.

Maybe after so long one flag was enough

We failed to recruit big fwds. You need a lot of them cos some often don't pan out. Ie Weed.

We also strangely picked up a few players from other clubs that weren't very good.

Also something went wrong with our club culture too. Something wasn't right and it's hurt us.

In any case it shows what happens when you get cocky. Success can be an enemy.

Shame because we thought so much we had a great list. I guess we did. We just lost two double chances and one cos Gus was Ko. But the way Salem played today and Fritta and Oliver and ... absolutely makers of our 21 cup. ....it's hard to understand

AFL cubs fortunes come and go as MFC fans no better than most.

Maybe time for Goody to go.

He failed to move Turner when we couldn't take a mark inside fifty or convert a set shot.

Gee we've had it so good for a few years I've forgotten how painful footy can be.

Bummer.

Edited by leave it to deever


1 minute ago, Pirlo said:

Game was pretty indicative of where we are. Nowhere near as bad as we looked rds 2-5, but a bit of a shadow of our old self. Relying a lot on a select few guys delivering their role every single week - namely Gawn, McDonald, Melksham, Bowey, Langford, Petracca, Langford, Pickett, Chandler. When any of these guys lower their colours, like TMac in the final quarter today, nobody else seems to step up to replace them. Some real good youth who I have a lot of faith in, but equally a couple of young guys who are tilting towards busts. Jefferson and Tholstrup the obvious candidates, and whilst it breaks my heart to say because he did look good, JVR isn't far away.

Out:

Fritsch - made Sicily, the guy in the worst form of his career, look unreal. Barely even applied percieved pressure, never mind actual pressure. And I've been a defender of his.

Jefferson - absolutely nowhere near it, unfortunately.

Tholstrup - I said it when he debuted and I'll say it again - there are no clear strengths to his game. What was Taylor thinking? Hope he comes good, but he has a lot to do.

In:

Melksham - football smarts

Petty - can't believe he's the answer again, but here we are

Laurie - deserves another go

Oliver for Viney and JVR for Fullarton are both tempting changes too. Fullarton can barely play, but there's something in his and Petty's ability to stay out of eachother's way.

Yes to Laurie but only as a short term sub for Kolt and only if he performs on match day. Otherwise back he goes.

There is no one on the present list that stands out as a 'knocking on the door' option for that 23rd spot.

Was hoping it might be Brown dog but he doesn't appear to be coming on either (to date anyway....shows glimpses). Didn't see any of the Casey game today though but sounds like most were pretty average.

1 hour ago, No10 said:

Clearly I’m typing with eyes closed. We were the better team.

JVR looks everything he should be, just can’t break out. I see it as just a matter of time and when he does, it will stick.

Oliver has a journey back but I believe in him 1000%, just hope it’s with us. Trac, Gawn. Gods. The youth are incredible, Lindsay was excellent, Langford sublime. Windsor set himself a high standard. Kolt should’ve started. There’s a lot of improvement from McVee. Fritch was playing on Sicily which is no small task, thought he did ok.

Honestly, it seems like a team that should be contending. That’s my frustration, the chemistry isn’t chemisting.

I admire your positivity. No mention of Jefferson?

6 minutes ago, Pirlo said:

JVR kicked 5 in the VFL last time out, didn't he?

Chandler also isn't a small forward. He's very clearly playing between the arcs.

That was a 100 point thrashing of a very poor Tiger team. He was given the ball on a platter a few times and kicked some lovely goals from various angles and a couple were from distance with the breeze.

However, for all matches prior till then, he was horribly out of form and looked lost in his first Casey game against a much more competitive and serious VFL team in the Giants.

We needed to see how he went over a decent body of work against a few other reasonable or better VFL teams before deciding to bring him back.

Even some ppl close to him admitted that he was a mile off it and in bad form.

But the fact that the Coach & FD couldn't see that and pulled the trigger too soon is on them.

I hope he turns it around but the chopping and changing of out-of-form players that don't really find true form at Casey and then are brought straight back in, only to be clobbered again at AFL level, is again, all on the coaches and the SC.

SHIITEHOUSE player management imv.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

2 hours ago, Red But Mostly Blue said:

Poor goalkicking.

Wasted opportunities.

Last quarter fade out

(Copy and paste from any game, really)

Umpiring was corrupt but it’s not why we lost. We were in it at 3Q but didn’t turn up. Again. Apparent we are not a real team and won’t beat any real teams this year. Blood the kids, get ready for 2026

But we should've been 30 points on top of the dirty Hawks, had we kicked our goals.

1 hour ago, Adam The God said:

You realise we led just before 3/4 time, plus had 4 more scoring shots than them to 3/4 time. We. Had. Them. On. Toast.

if you're gonna have a pop at least show you have a feel for the game.

We've completely changed the way we move the footy.

Yes but I thought we did go back to kicking long down the line too often and went away from switching around the flanks to open up the forward line.

Lack of tackles inside 50 was telling as well. Kolt should not have been sub.


Id give JVR a mulligan. I’d like to see him play 2nd fiddle to Petty. Turner does look good down back too so I’d rather play him there as the 3rd tall.

If JVR not capable then switch him to the backline as third tall and Turner up forward.

1 hour ago, BDA said:

Do you mean we should have recruited better goal kickers?

Fritsch missed 2 gimmes. thats on him, not the coaches.

Might also be on anyone involved in selecting him 🤔

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Might also be on anyone involved in selecting him 🤔

What happened to Frittata? He used to be automatic.

 
2 minutes ago, old dee said:

I admire your positivity. No mention of Jefferson?

Haven’t seen enough to say.

Wasn’t super excited when we drafted him, don’t really know what he’s meant to become?

Just looking it up, 2022 wasn’t exactly a super draft.

Just now, ElDiablo14 said:

What happened to Frittata? He used to be automatic.

It's a very very good question.

You can't question the ability. Unfortunately everything else warrants one ( question)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies