Jump to content

Featured Replies

Casey surging need to captialise

 

Dees. First two of second qtr… game on. Then Giants put on 3 goals against the breeze. Too easy.

Culley to Fritsch. Goal. Good contested mark … but why do players go off after a goal. It’s so fucjed!!!

 
Just now, Diamond_Jim said:

Jefferson doesn't have much of a game below his knees

Nor anywhere else.


11 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Fritsch, Van Rooyen 1 kick ,Jeffo spending time in defence MADNESS

Van Rooyen , was a Buy, now a Sell.

I think we all missed seeing him as what he really is , “lumbering” , “moving in a slow, heavy, awkward way”.

 
Just now, Abyssal said:

Van Rooyen , was a Buy, now a Sell.

I think we all missed seeing him as what he really is , “lumbering” , “moving in a slow, heavy, awkward way”.

Literally has 0 weapons, needs to be trialled as a key defender next summer

Kentfield has shown good mits behind the ball


Van Rooyen totally out of confidence just went up a week before the ball got to him

3 minutes ago, KC from Casey said:

Culley's next snap gets marked on the line. What's to come is almost inevitable.

Lazy… Culley was poor. Two golden chances to get us closer

  • Author

Better quarter and dominated the last ten minutes but wasted too many chances.

HT Casey Demons 4.5.29 UWS Giants 9.1.55

Goals Baldi Fritsch Johnson Sestan

Disposals Bonner 14 Billings Sestan 13 Baldi Culley 12

The question is whether Casey has thefitness and ability to come back from an almost five goal deficit.


Why are they trying to play fritta as a high half forward. He has played his best footy playing deep. If it ain’t broke dont fix it(it may be broke tho)

Hard to know if it’s just lack of confidence or uncertainty, but the Casey decision-making across the board is just dumb. They look like a bunch of dumb footballers, but I’ll stay glass half full and go with the former assessment. Apart from that, their tackling, kicking, marking and handballing is horribly inferior. So all the things making good footy. Geez this club is living under dark grey clouds. Where-when will we see the glimmer of light?????

37 minutes ago, Pirlo said:

Worst team to play against in the VFL when you have no confidence. Those two are starting defenders at most clubs. No need to overreact.

Youre making out as if they are Matthew Scarlett..

One is hasn't even played a game at AFL level at For 3 years and another just the 12 games next to his name.

On exposure Van Rooyen has played 44 games and kicked 62 goals at AFL level. It's simple, if he was desperate for to win his spot he'd be making a statement.

So far his statement is the 2 disposals for two whole quarters at VFL level.


Just now, Webber said:

Hard to know if it’s just lack of confidence or uncertainty, but the Casey decision-making across the board is just dumb. They look like a bunch of dumb footballers, but I’ll stay glass half full and go with the former assessment. Apart from that, their tackling, kicking, marking and handballing is horribly inferior. So all the things making good footy. Geez this club is living under dark grey clouds. Where-when will we see the glimmer of light?????

Glimmer of light sounds like a near death experience, which is not far from the truth.

28 minutes ago, adonski said:

Might be time to give Sestan a crack

BOG so far.

I'd get him in next week.

16 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

To have any chance of winning this they'll need to leave AJ in as the main ruck and change with Verral (for the chop out) off the bench or rest Verral forward if Rooh needs the odd break

Madness. Verrall is breaking even most of the time – AJ is getting mauled by Madden who is not a pretend giant. He would beat most AFL rucks at CB, but is a bit too slow around the ground.

It would be nice for some wingers and midfielders to keep the ball in our Forward line.

 
3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Youre making out as if they are Matthew Scarlett..

One is hasn't even played a game at AFL level at For 3 years and another just the 12 games next to his name.

On exposure Van Rooyen has played 44 games and kicked 62 goals at AFL level. It's simple, if he was desperate for to win his spot he'd be making a statement.

So far his statement is the 2 disposals for two whole quarters at VFL level.

Since his back spasms in the first minute of the practice match vs Fremantle, he hasn’t been the player he was in 2023 and 2024. I would rest him for a few weeks to find out what his problem is - I can’t see him turning things around at the moment.

9 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

Glimmer of light sounds like a near death experience, which is not far from the truth.

Code red. Code red. Clear. Anyone at Casey got a defibrillator handy?

If they stopped butchering the ball. And worked out which way the wind was blowing. They might be a chance.

Maybe it’s a tactic so that GWS will be out on their feet from over running? It’s not like our guys have used all their energy in the first half?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 194 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies