Jump to content

Featured Replies

40 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

How many finals have they won in the last 8 years again?

Hawthorn know all about Finals. Donโ€™t underestimate them

12 Flags since โ€™71

ย 
7 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

JVR? McVee?ย 

Good but neither are likely to challenge for elite (AA) status. At best you can say potential but they would need to move up a few gears

No intended criticism of those guys but they're not Petracca, Oliver or Lever. (Add to that May, Gawn and {Brayshaw cusp of elite})

Edited by Diamond_Jim

10 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Good but neither are likely to challenge for elite (AA) status. At best you can say potential but they would need to move up a few gears

No intended criticism of those guys but they're not Petracca, Oliver or Lever. (Add to that May, Gawn and {Brayshaw cusp of elite})

True, not yet...and we'll know more in 2025 on these two. Im holding high hopes though.ย 

 
1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

True, not yet...and we'll know more in 2025 on these two. Im holding high hopes though.ย 

imo mcvee is already one of the best small defenders in the competition

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May, Pickett

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney

B+ - Fritsch, Salem, Langdon, Rivers, Sparrow, Petty, McVee, JVR

B - Bowey, Melksham, Windsor, Chandler, TMac, Tholstrupย 

C - C+- Turner, Spargo, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin, Verrallย 

Then - ย Campbell, Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield.

Iโ€™ve missed a couple but I fully expect our younger players to step up in โ€˜25. We have another 5 players to come in potentially and I put no ceiling on any one of them, actually hoping that 5 & 9 are ready to play Round 1. As mentioned in a number of posts injury is our enemy so we need our share of luck and good fortune.


I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett, Moniz-wakefield, McAdam
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Chandler, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Fullarton, Campbell
Mid/defenders: Salem, Rivers, McVee, Howes, Woewodin
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, McDonald, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty

Looking at that, I am pretty happy with our defensive stocks generally. We still need a young reliable KPD (I am not sure Adams is it) but currently it is not a priority.ย  If we assume one of Petty or Disco plays in defence long term, it is much more balanced.ย 

We need another ruck, but that's not a problem I think we can address in this draft.ย ย 

We're really lacking a quality, young, future A-grade, inside mid.ย 

We're also lacking a mid-forward with really damaging disposal - Spargo is probably the best of the lot, but he's injured a hell of a lot.ย  I think Tholstrup could be that player, but he's not quite there yet.ย 

We're lacking a mature KPF but that is not something we can address at the draft.ย  We could probably use one more up and coming KPF, but again, not a priority.

Looking at that, we could probably break it down as follows:ย 

High priority needs: Quality dedicated mid; mid-forward with damaging disposal

Long term needs: KPD, KPF, Ruck

If we look at it through that lens, I imagine we woud be looking at the following:ย 

Pick 5:ย Langford, Tauru, FOS, Smith
Pick 9: Tauru, Reid, Allen, Armstrong, Travaglia
Pick 79: KPD, Ruck
Rookies: KPDs, Rucksย 

I think our ideal draft would be Langford/FOS/Smith, Tauru.ย 

We can't really go wrong picking a mid at 5.ย  They are all great.ย  I would probably lean towards Langford, because his disposal seems the most damaging, and he can play as a forward easily, but he is more high risk than Smith or FOS.ย 

At 9, I think Tauru and Travaglia are the safest bets.ย  Tauru likely will be gone by our pick, though.

Reid, Armstrong and Allan all have more question marks over them, but each have really damaging traits that mean their ceiling is really high.ย  ย 

That's where I think we really need to trust JT - any of them could be elite, its just whether their downsides outweigh their advantages.ย ย 

If we pick Travaglia, I would assume it is to free up Rivers and allow him to play more midfield.ย 

ย 

ย 

Edited by Willy's Warriors

14 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

With a variety of herbs, half a kilo of mixed beef and veal mince, several tomatoes, a carrot, zucchini and garlic, and significant cheese stocks to go with a series of flat pasta sheets, do the Demons really have what it takes to produce a carbonara in 2025? And can they afford the garlic bread?

Bolognese maybe, only 3 ingredients to carbonara (definitely not cream)

9 minutes ago, Willy's Warriors said:

I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett, Moniz-wakefield, McAdam
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Chandler, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Fullarton, Campbell
Mid/defenders: Salem, Rivers, McVee, Howes, Woewodin
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, McDonald, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty

Looking at that, I am pretty happy with our defensive stocks generally. We still need a young reliable KPD (I am not sure Adams is it) but currently it is not a priority.ย  If we assume one of Petty or Disco plays in defence long term, it is much more balanced.ย 

We need another ruck, but that's not a problem I think we can address in this draft.ย ย 

We're really lacking a quality, young, future A-grade, inside mid.ย 

We're also lacking a mid-forward with really damaging disposal - Spargo is probably the best of the lot, but he's injured a hell of a lot.ย  I think Tholstrup could be that player, but he's not quite there yet.ย 

We're lacking a mature KPF but that is not something we can address at the draft.ย  We could probably use one more up and coming KPF, but again, not a priorty.

Looking at that, we could probably break it down as follows:ย 

High priority needs: Quality dedicated mid; mid-forward with damaging disposal

Long term needs: KPD, KPF, Ruck

If we look at it through that lens, I imagine we woud be looking at the following:ย 

Pick 5:ย Langford, Tauru, FOS, Smith
Pick 9: Tauru, Reid, Allen, Armstrong, Travaglia
Pick 79: KPD, Ruck
Rookies: KPDs, Rucksย 

I think our ideal draft would be Langford/FOS/Smith, Tauru.ย  But if Tauru is gone, I think it will depend on what we see Reid and Allen becoming.ย 

If they are going to be reliable mids, I think we take them.ย  If there are question marks over them, however, then I think we take Armstrong or Travaglia, and hope Rivers fills the midfield void.ย 

ย 

ย 

Yes like your format Willys Warriors certainly shows our strengths and potential weaknesses, I was really just trying to Quantify our list. Notice that I missed McAdam hope Iโ€™m not subconsciously removing him due to comments on the training thread.๐Ÿ˜ณ

ย 
2 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

Yes like your format Willys Warriors certainly shows our strengths and potential weaknesses, I was really just trying to Quantify our list. Notice that I missed McAdam hope Iโ€™m not subconsciously removing him due to comments on the training thread.๐Ÿ˜ณ

McAdam is an interesting one.ย  If he goes, we really need another small forward I think.ย  Could really see us taking the two academy players Riak Andrew (KPD) and RIcky Mentha (Small Forward) as rookies.ย  I think Andrew is probably more imporant long term, though, and if I was a betting man, I would say we pick up a ruck somewhere late.ย 

Edited by Willy's Warriors

3 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney,ย Fritsch

B+ -Pickett, Langdon, Rivers, McVee, JVR

B - Windsor, Sparrow,ย Salem,ย Petty

C -ย TMac, ,ย Spargo,ย Chandler,ย Bowey,ย Melksham

C+- Turner, Tholstrup, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin,ย Campbell

Then - ย Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield,ย Verrall

ย 

in bold is the changes ive made, mostly you overvalue-ing players who have not had meaningful or decisive impact on a game either ever or in over 12 months. Tholstrup played 12 games, to call him a B grader is ambitious on current output, not to say he cant or wont get there in time.

3 hours ago, Willy's Warriors said:

I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Fullarton, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett,ย Chandler
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, McAdam, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Rivers, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Campbell
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Salem, McVee, Howes, Woewodin,ย Moniz-wakefield, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty,ย McDonald

again some adjustments imo, fullarton clearly not a ruck given our determination to play anyone else but him there and howes, woey, chandler etc will never receive mid time, if they do we are in a world of trouble, theyre scratching afl standard / mfc standard in less demandinf or important positions as it is


30 minutes ago, Turner said:

in bold is the changes ive made, mostly you overvalue-ing players who have not had meaningful or decisive impact on a game either ever or in over 12 months. Tholstrup played 12 games, to call him a B grader is ambitious on current output, not to say he cant or wont get there in time.

again some adjustments imo, fullarton clearly not a ruck given our determination to play anyone else but him there and howes, woey, chandler etc will never receive mid time, if they do we are in a world of trouble, theyre scratching afl standard / mfc standard in less demandinf or important positions as it is

You maybe correct Turner but my ratings are based on my personal thoughts and maybe hopes but I will be very surprised if we donโ€™t get more hits than misses.

Key Defenders:ย May, McDonald, Adams

General Def: Lever, Salem, Bowey, McVee, Hore (A), Moniz-Wakefield (B), Woewodin, Howes

Midfielders:ย Oliver, Viney, Petracca, Rivers, Windsor, Sparrow, Langdon, Billings, Sharp, Laurie, KBrown (A)

Rucks:ย Gawn, Campbell, Fullarton, Verrell (A)

General Fwd:ย Fritsch, Pickett, Spargo, Melksham, Chandler, Tholstrup, McAdam, Sestan (A)

Key Forwards:ย van Rooyen, Petty, Turner, Jefferson, Kentfield (A)

ย 

i always like to highlight the players out of contract coz i think its a good tell on where we will look to recruit as theres obvious uncertertainty abiut the current crop. it's no wonder we went hard for Houston. It's also why after the best available at 5, travaglia or allan is my preferred targets at 9. (or tauru if he gets there). Riak would add depth as as a key back and mentha as a small forward too. If we take 79 id expect it to be a ruck or KPD

On 16/11/2024 at 08:51, Whispering_Jack said:

A pretty harsh list analysis of Melbourneโ€™s 2024 season from John Ralph appeared in recently in the Herald Sun ~IMG_7122.thumb.jpeg.3861a38336b44fcf205d70c0bf32ba59.jpeg
I donโ€™t mind some tough analysis and it will be worth revisiting this at various stages of the preseason and again during 2025 to see if some of the critical areas were addressed.

ย 

But he has us finishing 8th so probably more generous ย than others overall.ย 

On 17/11/2024 at 11:02, DeeZone said:

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May, Pickett

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney

B+ - Fritsch, Salem, Langdon, Rivers, Sparrow, Petty, McVee, JVR

B - Bowey, Melksham, Windsor, Chandler, TMac, Tholstrupย 

C - C+- Turner, Spargo, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin, Verrallย 

Then - ย Campbell, Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield.

Iโ€™ve missed a couple but I fully expect our younger players to step up in โ€˜25. We have another 5 players to come in potentially and I put no ceiling on any one of them, actually hoping that 5 & 9 are ready to play Round 1. As mentioned in a number of posts injury is our enemy so we need our share of luck and good fortune.

Would swap Bowey to B + for Sparrow in B.ย 


On 16/11/2024 at 15:21, Diamond_Jim said:

They are okay and some could be/are good but hard to see any of them at the elite level. (Perhaps Windsor)

Windsor will be elite and a couple of others will be almost A graders. ย Two more years before all our youngsters reach their peak.ย 

16 minutes ago, 58er said:

Would swap Bowey to B + for Sparrow in B.ย 

Hoping Sparrow finds his mojo this year and back to his โ€˜21 form.

5 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Hoping Sparrow finds his mojo this year and back to his โ€˜21 form.

Yes we all canโ€™t wait hereโ€™s hoping Tommy can finally deliver on potential.ย 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: North Melbourne

    Can you believe it? After a long period of years over which Melbourne has dominated in matches against North Melbourne, the Demons are looking down the barrel at two defeats at the hands of the Kangaroos in the same season. And if that eventuates, it will come hot on the heels of an identical result against the Gold Coast Suns. How have the might fallen? There is a slight difference in that North Melbourne are not yet in the same place as Gold Coast. Like Melbourne, they are currently situated in the lower half of the ladder and though they did achieve a significant upset when the teams met earlier in the season, their subsequent form has been equally unimpressive and inconsistent.ย 

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more ย consecutive defeats.ย 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 156 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 246 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 28 replies