Jump to content

Featured Replies

40 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

How many finals have they won in the last 8 years again?

Hawthorn know all about Finals. Donโ€™t underestimate them

12 Flags since โ€™71

ย 
7 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

JVR? McVee?ย 

Good but neither are likely to challenge for elite (AA) status. At best you can say potential but they would need to move up a few gears

No intended criticism of those guys but they're not Petracca, Oliver or Lever. (Add to that May, Gawn and {Brayshaw cusp of elite})

Edited by Diamond_Jim

10 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Good but neither are likely to challenge for elite (AA) status. At best you can say potential but they would need to move up a few gears

No intended criticism of those guys but they're not Petracca, Oliver or Lever. (Add to that May, Gawn and {Brayshaw cusp of elite})

True, not yet...and we'll know more in 2025 on these two. Im holding high hopes though.ย 

 
1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

True, not yet...and we'll know more in 2025 on these two. Im holding high hopes though.ย 

imo mcvee is already one of the best small defenders in the competition

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May, Pickett

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney

B+ - Fritsch, Salem, Langdon, Rivers, Sparrow, Petty, McVee, JVR

B - Bowey, Melksham, Windsor, Chandler, TMac, Tholstrupย 

C - C+- Turner, Spargo, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin, Verrallย 

Then - ย Campbell, Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield.

Iโ€™ve missed a couple but I fully expect our younger players to step up in โ€˜25. We have another 5 players to come in potentially and I put no ceiling on any one of them, actually hoping that 5 & 9 are ready to play Round 1. As mentioned in a number of posts injury is our enemy so we need our share of luck and good fortune.


I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett, Moniz-wakefield, McAdam
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Chandler, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Fullarton, Campbell
Mid/defenders: Salem, Rivers, McVee, Howes, Woewodin
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, McDonald, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty

Looking at that, I am pretty happy with our defensive stocks generally. We still need a young reliable KPD (I am not sure Adams is it) but currently it is not a priority.ย  If we assume one of Petty or Disco plays in defence long term, it is much more balanced.ย 

We need another ruck, but that's not a problem I think we can address in this draft.ย ย 

We're really lacking a quality, young, future A-grade, inside mid.ย 

We're also lacking a mid-forward with really damaging disposal - Spargo is probably the best of the lot, but he's injured a hell of a lot.ย  I think Tholstrup could be that player, but he's not quite there yet.ย 

We're lacking a mature KPF but that is not something we can address at the draft.ย  We could probably use one more up and coming KPF, but again, not a priority.

Looking at that, we could probably break it down as follows:ย 

High priority needs: Quality dedicated mid; mid-forward with damaging disposal

Long term needs: KPD, KPF, Ruck

If we look at it through that lens, I imagine we woud be looking at the following:ย 

Pick 5:ย Langford, Tauru, FOS, Smith
Pick 9: Tauru, Reid, Allen, Armstrong, Travaglia
Pick 79: KPD, Ruck
Rookies: KPDs, Rucksย 

I think our ideal draft would be Langford/FOS/Smith, Tauru.ย 

We can't really go wrong picking a mid at 5.ย  They are all great.ย  I would probably lean towards Langford, because his disposal seems the most damaging, and he can play as a forward easily, but he is more high risk than Smith or FOS.ย 

At 9, I think Tauru and Travaglia are the safest bets.ย  Tauru likely will be gone by our pick, though.

Reid, Armstrong and Allan all have more question marks over them, but each have really damaging traits that mean their ceiling is really high.ย  ย 

That's where I think we really need to trust JT - any of them could be elite, its just whether their downsides outweigh their advantages.ย ย 

If we pick Travaglia, I would assume it is to free up Rivers and allow him to play more midfield.ย 

ย 

ย 

Edited by Willy's Warriors

14 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

With a variety of herbs, half a kilo of mixed beef and veal mince, several tomatoes, a carrot, zucchini and garlic, and significant cheese stocks to go with a series of flat pasta sheets, do the Demons really have what it takes to produce a carbonara in 2025? And can they afford the garlic bread?

Bolognese maybe, only 3 ingredients to carbonara (definitely not cream)

9 minutes ago, Willy's Warriors said:

I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett, Moniz-wakefield, McAdam
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Chandler, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Fullarton, Campbell
Mid/defenders: Salem, Rivers, McVee, Howes, Woewodin
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, McDonald, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty

Looking at that, I am pretty happy with our defensive stocks generally. We still need a young reliable KPD (I am not sure Adams is it) but currently it is not a priority.ย  If we assume one of Petty or Disco plays in defence long term, it is much more balanced.ย 

We need another ruck, but that's not a problem I think we can address in this draft.ย ย 

We're really lacking a quality, young, future A-grade, inside mid.ย 

We're also lacking a mid-forward with really damaging disposal - Spargo is probably the best of the lot, but he's injured a hell of a lot.ย  I think Tholstrup could be that player, but he's not quite there yet.ย 

We're lacking a mature KPF but that is not something we can address at the draft.ย  We could probably use one more up and coming KPF, but again, not a priorty.

Looking at that, we could probably break it down as follows:ย 

High priority needs: Quality dedicated mid; mid-forward with damaging disposal

Long term needs: KPD, KPF, Ruck

If we look at it through that lens, I imagine we woud be looking at the following:ย 

Pick 5:ย Langford, Tauru, FOS, Smith
Pick 9: Tauru, Reid, Allen, Armstrong, Travaglia
Pick 79: KPD, Ruck
Rookies: KPDs, Rucksย 

I think our ideal draft would be Langford/FOS/Smith, Tauru.ย  But if Tauru is gone, I think it will depend on what we see Reid and Allen becoming.ย 

If they are going to be reliable mids, I think we take them.ย  If there are question marks over them, however, then I think we take Armstrong or Travaglia, and hope Rivers fills the midfield void.ย 

ย 

ย 

Yes like your format Willys Warriors certainly shows our strengths and potential weaknesses, I was really just trying to Quantify our list. Notice that I missed McAdam hope Iโ€™m not subconsciously removing him due to comments on the training thread.๐Ÿ˜ณ

ย 
2 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

Yes like your format Willys Warriors certainly shows our strengths and potential weaknesses, I was really just trying to Quantify our list. Notice that I missed McAdam hope Iโ€™m not subconsciously removing him due to comments on the training thread.๐Ÿ˜ณ

McAdam is an interesting one.ย  If he goes, we really need another small forward I think.ย  Could really see us taking the two academy players Riak Andrew (KPD) and RIcky Mentha (Small Forward) as rookies.ย  I think Andrew is probably more imporant long term, though, and if I was a betting man, I would say we pick up a ruck somewhere late.ย 

Edited by Willy's Warriors

3 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney,ย Fritsch

B+ -Pickett, Langdon, Rivers, McVee, JVR

B - Windsor, Sparrow,ย Salem,ย Petty

C -ย TMac, ,ย Spargo,ย Chandler,ย Bowey,ย Melksham

C+- Turner, Tholstrup, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin,ย Campbell

Then - ย Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield,ย Verrall

ย 

in bold is the changes ive made, mostly you overvalue-ing players who have not had meaningful or decisive impact on a game either ever or in over 12 months. Tholstrup played 12 games, to call him a B grader is ambitious on current output, not to say he cant or wont get there in time.

3 hours ago, Willy's Warriors said:

I think its more useful to try and formulate a depth chart.ย  Which would look something like this:ย 

KPF: Van Rooyen, Jefferson, Fullarton, Kentfield
Small Forwards: Pickett,ย Chandler
Medium forwards: Melksham, Fritsch, Spargo, McAdam, Sestan,
Mid/forwards: Tholstrup, Billings, Laurie,
Inside Mids: Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Rivers, Sparrow, Brown
Outside Mids/Wings: Windsor, Langdon, Sharp
Rucks: Gawn, Verall, Campbell
Small/medium defenders: Bowey, Salem, McVee, Howes, Woewodin,ย Moniz-wakefield, Hore
KPD: May, Lever, Adamsย 
KPF/KPDs: Turner, Petty,ย McDonald

again some adjustments imo, fullarton clearly not a ruck given our determination to play anyone else but him there and howes, woey, chandler etc will never receive mid time, if they do we are in a world of trouble, theyre scratching afl standard / mfc standard in less demandinf or important positions as it is


30 minutes ago, Turner said:

in bold is the changes ive made, mostly you overvalue-ing players who have not had meaningful or decisive impact on a game either ever or in over 12 months. Tholstrup played 12 games, to call him a B grader is ambitious on current output, not to say he cant or wont get there in time.

again some adjustments imo, fullarton clearly not a ruck given our determination to play anyone else but him there and howes, woey, chandler etc will never receive mid time, if they do we are in a world of trouble, theyre scratching afl standard / mfc standard in less demandinf or important positions as it is

You maybe correct Turner but my ratings are based on my personal thoughts and maybe hopes but I will be very surprised if we donโ€™t get more hits than misses.

Key Defenders:ย May, McDonald, Adams

General Def: Lever, Salem, Bowey, McVee, Hore (A), Moniz-Wakefield (B), Woewodin, Howes

Midfielders:ย Oliver, Viney, Petracca, Rivers, Windsor, Sparrow, Langdon, Billings, Sharp, Laurie, KBrown (A)

Rucks:ย Gawn, Campbell, Fullarton, Verrell (A)

General Fwd:ย Fritsch, Pickett, Spargo, Melksham, Chandler, Tholstrup, McAdam, Sestan (A)

Key Forwards:ย van Rooyen, Petty, Turner, Jefferson, Kentfield (A)

ย 

i always like to highlight the players out of contract coz i think its a good tell on where we will look to recruit as theres obvious uncertertainty abiut the current crop. it's no wonder we went hard for Houston. It's also why after the best available at 5, travaglia or allan is my preferred targets at 9. (or tauru if he gets there). Riak would add depth as as a key back and mentha as a small forward too. If we take 79 id expect it to be a ruck or KPD

On 16/11/2024 at 08:51, Whispering_Jack said:

A pretty harsh list analysis of Melbourneโ€™s 2024 season from John Ralph appeared in recently in the Herald Sun ~IMG_7122.thumb.jpeg.3861a38336b44fcf205d70c0bf32ba59.jpeg
I donโ€™t mind some tough analysis and it will be worth revisiting this at various stages of the preseason and again during 2025 to see if some of the critical areas were addressed.

ย 

But he has us finishing 8th so probably more generous ย than others overall.ย 

On 17/11/2024 at 11:02, DeeZone said:

Iโ€™m looking at this side a bit differently-ย 

A+ - Gawn, Petracca, May, Pickett

A - Lever, Oliver, Viney

B+ - Fritsch, Salem, Langdon, Rivers, Sparrow, Petty, McVee, JVR

B - Bowey, Melksham, Windsor, Chandler, TMac, Tholstrupย 

C - C+- Turner, Spargo, Howes, Billings, Moniz-Wakefield, Sharp, Woewodin, Verrallย 

Then - ย Campbell, Jefferson, Laurie, Brown, ย Adams, Seston, Hore, Fullarton, Kentfield.

Iโ€™ve missed a couple but I fully expect our younger players to step up in โ€˜25. We have another 5 players to come in potentially and I put no ceiling on any one of them, actually hoping that 5 & 9 are ready to play Round 1. As mentioned in a number of posts injury is our enemy so we need our share of luck and good fortune.

Would swap Bowey to B + for Sparrow in B.ย 


On 16/11/2024 at 15:21, Diamond_Jim said:

They are okay and some could be/are good but hard to see any of them at the elite level. (Perhaps Windsor)

Windsor will be elite and a couple of others will be almost A graders. ย Two more years before all our youngsters reach their peak.ย 

16 minutes ago, 58er said:

Would swap Bowey to B + for Sparrow in B.ย 

Hoping Sparrow finds his mojo this year and back to his โ€˜21 form.

5 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Hoping Sparrow finds his mojo this year and back to his โ€˜21 form.

Yes we all canโ€™t wait hereโ€™s hoping Tommy can finally deliver on potential.ย 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the ย Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measlyย 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?ย  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where theyโ€™ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 360 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sundayโ€™s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Like
    • 24 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullartonโ€™s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Caseyโ€™s three matches and, with Melbourneโ€™s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next weekโ€™s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forwardโ€™s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasnโ€™t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the teamโ€™s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourneโ€™s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season.ย There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight.ย Since that game, the Demonsโ€™ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the โ€˜G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sundayโ€™s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 273 replies
    Demonland