Jump to content

Featured Replies

55 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Absolutely. There's been smoke there for a while but delusional supporters still don't want to believe that there is nothing wrong with the club.

The footy department have the biggest 3 months ahead since the pre Paul Roos appointment in getting the right people in the door through the door whether thats coaching or recruitment. 

There are a number of factors why there are players that are currently unhappy, but when it's your star player, you take on his feedback and do whatever it takes. 

Gut the place, and put some fresh voices around our team and give them a game plan that is going to play to their strengths that will stand up in finals and win.

 

EXACTLY GUT THE PLACE starting with The President, Coach, the ENTIRE football department and then some. 100% BUYING IN ON THIS !

Edited by picket fence

 
16 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

If any of this is true, it says a lot about his leadership and character. 

Yeah, we nearly killed him sending him back out on the field, but its Tracs character 

1 hour ago, middleagedemon said:

One can only laugh at the demonland cheer squad brigade who  will continue to defend the club at all costs. Watch them now blame Petracca in all of this haha. 

Some supports really need to wake up. 

I'm sure that some of this will be to do with the type of footy we are playing as well. 

I think what concerns me more than this Trac news, is the implosion of the supporter base. 
 

Continue with the personal attacks on people on here, with the attacks on the coach, President, and the players etc. 

 

Not necessarily a blight on you @middleagedemon, as you have many friends. 
 

it’s time to stick fat, support and galvanise. 
 

Just saying…… 

 

He may not want out but I'd get it if he was frustrated.

Nasty knee in the back sidelined him for half a year.

His mate Gus out for good.

Max has been struggling with injuries.

And not a few others struggling for form.

It's not the club of 21 . Wouldn't be as  easy to return compared to then.

1 hour ago, FearTheBeard said:

Club is rotten off the field. Every chance this is viney and petracca away of saying the off field needs to change or we leave the club. 
 

Goodwin, Richardson, roffey, pert and the board all need to go.

Yep

Edited by picket fence


1 hour ago, Norm Smith's Curse said:

Yeah I've heard a bit of this as well. Nothing overly positive. 

I have heard similar!

Edited by picket fence

4 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

I think what concerns me more than this Trac news, is the implosion of the supporter base. 
 

Continue with the personal attacks on people on here, with the attacks on the coach, President, and the players etc. 

 

Not necessarily a blight on you @middleagedemon, as you have many friends. 
 

it’s time to stick fat, support and galvanise. 
 

Just saying…… 

So no wins in finals in the last 2 years and failure to make the 8 and you want to Galvanise??? No mate current admin and coach need to go! 

 
1 hour ago, Ollie fan said:

WCW, what is your take on this?

From what I saw at training and from what I’ve recently been told chatting with the property stewards and one of the trainers and a couple of the boys re Tracc, this is very likely a huge bunch of BS, just like pretty much everything Morris says.

Of course Tracc is struggling with not being able to play and the extent and seriousness of his injuries, but that doesn’t mean he wants out.

 

I know it’s not what the soggy biscuit group wanna hear (NOT referring to you, Ollie fan. You’re one of my faves on here) but that’s my take on it anyways. 

Totally agree with DeeSince 73, i am a DeeSince 55. We could of got Hogan. Goody and assistants must, they have lost the plot.


3 minutes ago, Jeremy said:

It’s ok we’ll always have our covid cup 

Dude why even ‘support’ this club? Go find another hobby.

I’m sure what Tom Morris is reporting is true, Trac’s public comments since the incident have been pretty telling. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to work out there might be some resentment and bitterness at what happened and that’s totally fair. But a contract is a contract, bad luck! 

I feel more uneasy that another big name player will be moved on, the club can not afford to have Tracc leave. 

2 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

Jeffo wants out?

Yeah from shizen disposal into forward 50 would be my guess!

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

And his dad was also connected to Hawks. Go figure. 

And his dad was connected to the Dees! Go figure, three way trade where Jack ends up staying with us


2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

Totally disturbing on a number of levels Dazz!

FWIW all of the young boys that have recently re-signed said they love our culture. Maybe they're talking about the YoPro sponsorship. 

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

On the plus side. If Tracc, Clarry and Viney all leave we'll have 7 or 8 first round picks.

Yeah but by the time they will be ready I'll be DEAD!


If anything this makes a Clarry trade more likely. They’ll get rid of him to clean house 

6 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

It’s actually a positive that all this has finally surfaced. 
Nowhere to hide, it has to be addressed 100%

I guess the players don’t really appreciate contest and defence as much as Goody.

North would not be speaking with Jack Viney unless there was some small chance it could happen. Viney would have never dreamed of leaving Melbourne unless there was some smoke there, he’s too proud a man.

 

Edited by BW511

 
44 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Tom is probably a member 

A poll should start on who is Tom’s alias 🤓

Just now, deegirl said:

If anything this makes a Clarry trade more likely. They’ll get rid of him to clean house 

Hnmm a distinct but DISTURBING possibility. If he goes, cheezus there will be a LOT of Members INCLUDING ME Totally peeezed of. Seriously if he goes then our culture is poisen. Coz many other players stuff up and come out OK on the other side! Why can't we be the same. Sorry but if he goes, cheezus ARMAGEDON awaits!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies