Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

He'd be better than Sparrow that's for sure.

The way I felt about him was similar to the way I feel about Sparrow. And yes it is a bit revisionist. However both him and Sparrow had the opportunity to prove their worth this season, one stepped up ... the other, well you know.

One is playing in a much better team. It's not an apt comparison. 

 
3 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I have mentioned JJ a number of times, once again, he is given free passage to go the Swans, making them stronger and we are left with Casey Regulars

It’s like a 12 point turnaround 

You do realise that by facilitating moves for fringe players, which is what JJ was and doing the right thing by the player puts us in good stead with the powerful player managers.

This work doesn't occur in a vacuum. And player managers always speak highly of our club because we treat players with respect.

11 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

You do realise that by facilitating moves for fringe players, which is what JJ was and doing the right thing by the player puts us in good stead with the powerful player managers.

This work doesn't occur in a vacuum. And player managers always speak highly of our club because we treat players with respect.

So why do we never get the big key Forwards? Something we havent had Since Neita

I understand what you are saying, but we regularly seem to get the worst deal out of a 2 way trade

Why is that…Are we too nice??

 

Christ…another WERRIDEE thread running hot. Man is on 🔥 


1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So why do we never get the big key Forwards? Something we havent had Since Neita

I understand what you are saying, but we regularly seem to get the worst deal out of a 2 way trade

Why is that…Are we too nice??

Because we have other priorities and big forwards are hard to come by.

Midfields win flags.

No idea if we're too nice. I think we just know what we want and get the deal done.

I do acknowledge that our trades post Mahoney have not been great, but we were also a premier by that stage with a cap that was starting to bulge.

Edited by Binmans PA

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Because the blokes body is made of paper and struggles to play a full season out.

He's no use to the team if half of it is spent in rehab with all these soft tissue injuries.

He's going to be 30 next year, you're not going to get much more from him with his ongoing soft tissue injuries

The last para for me is why we should hold onto him. I do t see the point if we’re not going to get a good return. With Rivers and McVee probably spending more time in the middle next year, even  if we get 13/14 games from him then I think we should hold onto him. 

But if we are serious about having a mini rebuild then we do have to trade out a player or two that is fans won’t want to part with. 


For mine the best player for us to trade would be Steven May( people are going to hate me for suggesting it). I think it makes the most sense as he’s the one player that a trade could work well for all parties. 


He would could help a top 4 contender become a premiership team or the likes of North make finals while pocketing a massive pay packet in his last couple of years. He’s still worth a good draft pick imo he improves so many teams in the short term. 
 

Edited by Colm

  • Author

We won't get anything for Salo. I had Fort\Moyle on the bench because we have no depth everyone at the Casey side doesn't deserve a game. McDonald, Hore and Melksham have to go bring in the kids.

 
4 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

We won't get anything for Salo. I had Fort\Moyle on the bench because we have no depth everyone at the Casey side doesn't deserve a game. McDonald, Hore and Melksham have to go bring in the kids.

Would be catastrophic, especially Melksham. Reeks of getting rid of Junior McDonald. You have to have senior/experienced players around the club or there's no point bringing in kids.

46 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

Because we have other priorities and big forwards are hard to come by.

Midfields win flags.

No idea if we're too nice. I think we just know what we want and get the deal done.

I do acknowledge that our trades post Mahoney have not been great, but we were also a premier by that stage with a cap that was starting to bulge.

So what you are saying is that we have wanted to Trade in Players for Casey??


7 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what you are saying is that we have wanted to Trade in Players for Casey??

Maybe clubs and player managers love is because we play nice and are easy to deal with (roll over)….? 

50 minutes ago, Colm said:

 


For mine the best player for us to trade would be Steven May( people are going to hate me for suggesting it). I think it makes the most sense as he’s the one player that a trade could work well for all parties. 


He would could help a top 4 contender become a premiership team or the likes of North make finals while pocketing a massive pay packet in his last couple of years. He’s still worth a good draft pick imo he improves so many teams in the short term. 
 

That is just beyond ridiculous….

1 minute ago, Superunknown said:

Maybe clubs and player managers love is because we play nice and are easy to deal with (roll over)….? 

Seems that way….

Maybe we should try being a hard arsed bastard for a while, and actually get some Talent that we have craved

30 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Seems that way….

Maybe we should try being a hard arsed bastard for a while, and actually get some Talent that we have craved

That’s worked really well for Dodoro and the Bombers

1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

That’s worked really well for Dodoro and the Bombers

I couldn’t give a Dam about what they do

We need to be be more proactive. 
You have always been bullish on this list Roost

It has been diluted of talent over the last 3-4 years 


2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I couldn’t give a Dam about what they do

We need to be be more proactive. 
You have always been bullish on this list Roost

It has been diluted of talent over the last 3-4 years 

I have but from bullish we’ve lost Jackson, Gus, Petracca, most of Oliver, a fair chunk of Viney and a whack of May and now Gawn’s hobbled as well. No coach goes top 4 with that. I do think our recruiting has been ordinary but look at what’s been available and what we’re giving up for these guys. We gave plenty for May and Lever but now we need those picks for youngsters. We’re transitioning and if we snare a couple of plug and play youngsters, have a solid preseason and get a good run with injuries I’m more bullish about 25 than I was about this year. Gawn, May and Oliver remain my biggest concerns for next year. We’re asking way too much of, and are way too reliant on Gawn and that’s my main issue with the coaching currently.

3 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

I have but from bullish we’ve lost Jackson, Gus, Petracca, most of Oliver, a fair chunk of Viney and a whack of May and now Gawn’s hobbled as well. No coach goes top 4 with that. I do think our recruiting has been ordinary but look at what’s been available and what we’re giving up for these guys. We gave plenty for May and Lever but now we need those picks for youngsters. We’re transitioning and if we snare a couple of plug and play youngsters, have a solid preseason and get a good run with injuries I’m more bullish about 25 than I was about this year. Gawn, May and Oliver remain my biggest concerns for next year. We’re asking way too much of, and are way too reliant on Gawn and that’s my main issue with the coaching currently.

We need young Draft Talent and Senior Players who can be relied upon to play Seniors 

Because there is a void at Casey 

Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

We need young Draft Talent and Senior Players who can be relied upon to play Seniors 

Because there is a void at Casey 

We likely can’t have both but if Kalani Whote chooses us and our NGA prospects prove fruitful we could be back in a big way the next 4-6 years

1 hour ago, Colm said:

But if we are serious about having a mini rebuild then we do have to trade out a player or two that is fans won’t want to part with. 


For mine the best player for us to trade would be Steven May( people are going to hate me for suggesting it). I think it makes the most sense as he’s the one player that a trade could work well for all parties. 

It will be interesting to see if the club thinks we need a mini rebuild because as you say a good player will most likely have to make way. 
 

What would another team offer up for an aging May?

3 minutes ago, ANG13 said:

It will be interesting to see if the club thinks we need a mini rebuild because as you say a good player will most likely have to make way. 
 

What would another team offer up for an aging May?

We’re not moving May on but I’d guess next year is his last 


1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

We’re not moving May on but I’d guess next year is his last 

Agree with you on all of that. 

5 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We’re not moving May on but I’d guess next year is his last 

The Demonland interview with May earlier this year (or was it last year?) was telling - May didn't sound at all confident of going beyond his current contract - noting preseasons getting more difficult, age catching up, etc. 

2 minutes ago, gs77 said:

The Demonland interview with May earlier this year (or was it last year?) was telling - May didn't sound at all confident of going beyond his current contract - noting preseasons getting more difficult, age catching up, etc. 

He’s played a high impact style of game and he’s had his share of injuries. He’s looked sore and stiff since he broke his ribs. Probably needed a month off to get fully healed and mobile again. 

 

We've got no chips to play with and little currency in any players. We aren't attractive for players to want to force a trade to come to us for what we've got.

2024 First Rounder is obviously the best mid on the board as we are miles behind the best midfields. 2025 First Round pick we try to trade for a 2024 First Round pick and take the next best mid on the board.

Petty goes back to take the McDonald spot and then later the May spot. Disco stays forward and Jeffo comes in. 

McQualter gets 1 more year with a fitter Clarry. Stafford surely moved on.

 

26 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

I have but from bullish we’ve lost Jackson, Gus, Petracca, most of Oliver, a fair chunk of Viney and a whack of May and now Gawn’s hobbled as well. No coach goes top 4 with that. I do think our recruiting has been ordinary but look at what’s been available and what we’re giving up for these guys. We gave plenty for May and Lever but now we need those picks for youngsters. We’re transitioning and if we snare a couple of plug and play youngsters, have a solid preseason and get a good run with injuries I’m more bullish about 25 than I was about this year. Gawn, May and Oliver remain my biggest concerns for next year. We’re asking way too much of, and are way too reliant on Gawn and that’s my main issue with the coaching currently.

They don’t. However long before the major injuries we still lost to Freo by 90+ points , Brisbane by 50 odd at the G.

This year was not about personnel, it was evident from very early on that we came up with a new/revised game plan, sides works it out within a few weeks and then we got caught out.
 

I think we’ll be about the same next year maybe 1-2 more Ws but we will still miss finals as we continue rebuilding. I’d pass on Houston and maybe look at it again in 1-2 years when hopefully we re enter the window.

 

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies