Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Nascent said:

1. WC - Reid

2. GC - Walter (bid matched)

3. Nth - McKercher

4. Nth - Curtin (first surprise)

 

dees trade pick 7 and f1st with hawks for pick 5

 

5. Dees - Duursma

6. Wb - Sanders

7. Hawks - Watson

8. GC - Read (bid matched)

9. GWS - Windsor

 

Adelaide trade 12 and 22 for Geelongs pick 10 and change

 

10. Ade - O'Sullivan

11. Ess - Caddy

12. Gee - Leake

13. Mel - Tholstrup

 

 

This or

if WC trades pick 1 then

1 Reid 

42 Simpson

if no live trades 

7 Curtin

13 Windsor

 

 

 

6. Windsor

11. Tholstrup.

Personally, I would be very disappointed if we didn’t take Curtin, but I expect the two above will be who we go with. 
 

Edit: iPhone autocorrected ‘Windsor’ to ‘Wilson’.

Edited by BLWNBA

 
  • Crom rumoured to want the Giants pick for Curtin so swap them round
  • 3 bids in a row from the Swans for fun

share-image.jpeg

Edited by adonski

12 minutes ago, adonski said:
  • Crom rumoured to want the Giants pick for Curtin so swap them round
  • 3 bids in a row from the Swans for fun

share-image.jpeg

Just a theory but If Adelaide deal up for Curtin at 9 we could move up to 10 with Geelong to take Leake given Essendon will likely take Caddy and GWS might not want a key defender.

 


On 17/11/2023 at 12:07, WalkingCivilWar said:

But will we? He’ll be guarded, like he should be. 

l would not be surprised if our frontal assault for Reid is a smokescreen.

Duursma and Tholstrup

 

Hope for 

6 Sanders or Curtin

11 Windsor, Leake Or O’Sullivan 

 

Looks like it will be as many journalists and Cal prediction

6 Windsor 

11 Tholstrup 

18 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

l would not be surprised if our frontal assault for Reid is a smokescreen.

Duursma and Tholstrup

 

I doubt it is a smokescreen as it was an offer that could have been accepted and as yet hasn't been rejected and Taylor when asked who he would pick at 6 said Reid indicating the obvious that anyone who could select him would unless they had bigger issues (go home and need for multiple quality picks) 

 
On 19/11/2023 at 18:02, spirit of norm smith said:

Hope for 

6 Sanders or Curtin

11 Windsor, Leake Or O’Sullivan 

 

Looks like it will be as many journalists and Cal prediction

6 Windsor 

11 Tholstrup 

What do we win? Though Windsor and Tholstrup were paying $1.25 odds 

  • Author
10 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

What do we win? Though Windsor and Tholstrup were paying $1.25 odds 

Adonski is our winner. Picked both Windsor and Tholstrup with the first response to the opening post.

In hindsight, many might say "but they were the obvious choices". Except that of about 60 suggestions made, only two or three actually got both selections correct.


47 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

You're not a member of the  English men's Test cricket team, are you?

Nah, just a supplier of quality bants!

Edited by layzie

2 hours ago, layzie said:

Didn't write it here but I also had Windsor and Tholstrup..

He was talking about predicting before they were picked.


Some really smart picks by a few people Congrats.

On 21/11/2023 at 15:06, layzie said:

Didn't write it here but I also had Windsor and Tholstrup..

I predicted you predicted them.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thumb Down
      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 113 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 243 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Vomit
    • 24 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 27 replies