Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
1 minute ago, Jibroni said:

Wondering what GWS will be offering for Bedford now.

Think their picks are now 3,12, 19 and 44.

 

 

Won't be pick 19 sadly. If 31 comes through for Hopper I would be working towards that.

 
3 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Wondering what GWS will be offering for Bedford now.

Think their picks are now 3,12, 19 and 44.

Bedford and 27 for 19 and 44, then 19 for Grundy?

 
  • Author

Interesting from Brisbane as well. Slight downgrade in points this year which doesn't help them for f/s prospects and now no first rounder this year for Dunkley either. 

1 minute ago, Nascent said:

Interesting from Brisbane as well. Slight downgrade in points this year which doesn't help them for f/s prospects and now no first rounder this year for Dunkley either. 

Agree. Dogs probably don't like this trade.


1 hour ago, Jibroni said:

Wondering what GWS will be offering for Bedford now.

Think their picks are now 3,12, 19 and 44.

 

 

This is the problem 

1 hour ago, Jibroni said:

Wondering what GWS will be offering for Bedford now.

Think their picks are now 3,12, 19 and 44.

They also have 15 from the Brisbane swap.

And the Hopper deal, while stalled, is yet to come.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

 

I’m afraid Cadman is at GWS next year. They need a KPF and they have the picks. Can’t see it any other way unless we get #2.

18 minutes ago, CYB said:

I’m afraid Cadman is at GWS next year. They need a KPF and they have the picks. Can’t see it any other way unless we get #2.

May come back to bite me but if so this is a good thing. High bust potential. 


12 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Bowes + 7 (Jhye Clark) plus Bruhn and Henry to the reigning premiers.  Wtf 

They'll have to give something decent back to GC for 7 + Bowes - probably F1st.

Then what are they using for Bruhn and Henry? Will take 18 and ?

I don't think they're getting Henry done, that sounds like it's being driven by Henry more than the Cats and Collingwood want to keep him.

  • Author
12 minutes ago, old55 said:

They'll have to give something decent back to GC for 7 + Bowes - probably F1st.

Then what are they using for Bruhn and Henry? Will take 18 and ?

I don't think they're getting Henry done, that sounds like it's being driven by Henry more than the Cats and Collingwood want to keep him.

Few permutations could come out of Bowes to Geelong.

-Geelongs incoming 7 to freo for 13 and kangas future 2nd

-Freos 7 and future first to Melbourne for Jackson

 

Geelong will then have 13, 18 and kangas future 2nd which should facilitate deals for Bruhn and Henry easy enough, even if they throw their future 1st back to Suns. Depends if they want to take 7 to the draft or not I guess.

 

5 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Few permutations could come out of Bowes to Geelong.

-Geelongs incoming 7 to freo for 13 and kangas future 2nd

-Freos 7 and future first to Melbourne for Jackson

 

Geelong will then have 13, 18 and kangas future 2nd which should facilitate deals for Bruhn and Henry easy enough, even if they throw their future 1st back to Suns. Depends if they want to take 7 to the draft or not I guess.

 

Works for me. 

Effectively, WC would split 2 and send Rioli to Port for pick 8 and ports' F1st.

Freo are in a bit of trouble re: Jackson. I'd take 8 and WC F1st for Jackson and our F2

Edited by Mickey


2 minutes ago, Mickey said:

 

So north get pick 2 from wc for Francis, have to wonder what port can give wc in return. Maybe they turn that into Jackson

3 minutes ago, Mickey said:

Effectively, WC would split 2 and send Rioli to Port for pick 8 and ports' F1st.

Freo are in a bit of trouble re: Jackson. I'd take 8 and WC F1st for Jackson and our F2

Like I said in the LJ thread:

31 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I wish there was some news out of Freo. 

The silence seems like they are doing side deals but ignoring Jackson. 

Meanwhile their potential pick swap partners are doing other deals, players traded and Freo is playing in its own little pond, by itself!!

 

4 minutes ago, Mickey said:

Effectively, WC would split 2 and send Rioli to Port for pick 8 and ports' F1st.

Freo are in a bit of trouble re: Jackson. I'd take 8 and WC F1st for Jackson and our F2

This also works… 

Just now, Garbo said:

So north get pick 2 from wc for Francis, have to wonder what port can give wc in return. Maybe they turn that into Jackson

WC get 8 and Ports' 2023 1st, while giving up 2 and Rioli


1 minute ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Like I said in the LJ thread:

 

I wonder if they have taken him for granted. Just assuming he won't go to WC

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

 

I think they have their points now for Ashcroft without trading the first rounder?

Edited by CYB

 
9 minutes ago, Mickey said:

Effectively, WC would split 2 and send Rioli to Port for pick 8 and ports' F1st.

Freo are in a bit of trouble re: Jackson. I'd take 8 and WC F1st for Jackson and our F2

What am I missing here ?

WC give up 2 and Rioli for 8 and a potential first rounder next year in the teens.

How are WC better off ?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 215 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 526 replies