Jump to content

Featured Replies

If it’s the decision of the NT Government not to allow the game to be played Friday night in the ā€œAliceā€ do we get our $700K?

If we played there,Ā most likely there would Ā be no crowd permitted to attend.

If they agreed to a fly in fly out game in Alice SpringsĀ would we be contractually obligated to do it?

Sydney is the most likely outcome. Get there local Dee’s Supporters.

Ā 

Ā 
  • Author

Melbourne will lose $800,000 from the NT Government if it loses its Alice Springs clash and $1 million-plus if the Queen’s Birthday clash at the MCG in Round 13 is relocated.

Demons CEO Gary Pert said on Saturday the alternative was playing in Sydney or Queensland on Friday night.

ā€œAt this stage it’s more likely to be interstate,ā€ Pert said of the clash, which could cost the Demons $800,000 if not played under a NT sponsorship arrangement.

  • Author

Which AFL Clubs are still in Victoria?

Carlton - Sydney - Play WCE presumably now in Sydney in Rd 12 - Bye in Rd 13

Collingwood - Victoria - hoping for a FIFO exemption to travel to Adelaide in Rd 12

Essendon - Perth - Rd 12 Rich in Perth - Bye in Rd 13

Geelong - Victoria - Bye in Rd 12 - Play Port in Rd 13

Hawthorn - Sydney - Bye in Rd 12 - Play Sydney in Sydney Rd 13

Melbourne - Victoria - in limbo - Rd 12 Alice?, Rd 13 QB

North - Victoria - Bye in Rd 12 - Play Giants in Tas Rd 13

Richmond - Sydney - Rd 12 Ess in Perth - Bye in Rd 13

St. Kilda - Flying to Sydney to play Sydney Rd 12 - Play Adelaide in Cairns Rd 13

Western Bulldogs - Flying to Sydney to Play Freo in Perth in Rd 12 - Bye in Rd 13

Ā 

 

SCG just reported

We must be desperate for cash if we’re contemplating ā€œhostingā€ Brisbane at the Gabba on Friday night.

What an absolute home ground advantage that would be for Brisbane- the same side that played 14/17 home and away games in QLD last year.


  • Author
1 minute ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

We must be desperate for cash if we’re contemplating ā€œhostingā€ Brisbane at the Gabba on Friday night.

What an absolute home ground advantage that would be for Brisbane- the same side that played 14/17 home and away games in QLD last year.

I have not seen that put forward and I doubt it would be an option. Even less so if we were forced to play as a fly in fly out.

I can't see it being in Qld unless their goverment changes its policy.Ā  They stopped GWS boarding a flight to Brisbane on Friday because they played in Melbourne 13 days earlier.Ā  They had to leave the next day ie day 14.

Big turnaround if they let us or other teams play in Qld next weekend.

Ā 

If Brisbane couldĀ get an exemption from their government to fly in - fly out, why can’t this game be at the MCG in front of nobody.

I find it hard to believe that we will make a buck in front of 1,500 people at the SCG.

May as well lobby to play the game at our home ground and not mess around with travel.

2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

I have not seen that put forward and I doubt it would be an option. Even less so if we were forced to play as a fly in fly out.

Ch 7 news reported it just then.Ā I think it was Mark Stevens that mentioned Brisbane as an outside chance to host the game.

Aside from finances I can’t work out the rationale in conceding a home game to Brisbane.


1 hour ago, Jaded said:

Hard decision. Finances must come into it, even tho I wish it wouldn’t.Ā 
Can we afford to lose the money? Because without a doubt fly in fly out means we likely lose the game.Ā 

Winning the game is more importantĀ 

  • Author
31 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

If Brisbane couldĀ get an exemption from their government to fly in - fly out, why can’t this game be at the MCG in front of nobody.

I find it hard to believe that we will make a buck in front of 1,500 people at the SCG.

May as well lobby to play the game at our home ground and not mess around with travel.

Buckleys of that happening. We're more likely to get the exemption to play in NT than Brisbane is to FIFO to Melboure or even us to FIFO of QLD.

Only way Vic teams will be able to go to QLD will be to hub in NSW for 2 weeks.

Surprised Collingwood are half a chance to FIFO of Adelaide next week.

17 minutes ago, A F said:

You're right. Conservative Governments keep everything open. See the UK and the US. Disaster zones.

Because there's usually a weird libertarian angle to the modern conservative governments, they're fine with impinging on ethnically and culturally diverse people's lives, but they tend to allow us whiteys our freedoms. They tend to just shut down the culturally diverse suburbs (see Christmas time in NSW). The Andrews Government did similar to be fair (see the Towers), but Victoria has a much higher culturally diverse population than anywhere else. The current strain we're dealing with is the Indian strain unfortunately, so we have more Indian-Victorians trying to get back to Melbourne. When your quarantine system is a hotel then you'll get outbreaks.Ā 

As for Liberal Governments, it wouldn't have gotten out in Victoria if a Liberal SA Government hadn't allowed it out of quarantine, while if a Liberal Federal Government had listened to pleas for months now for proper quarantine facilities rather than hotels, and had rolled out a competent vaccine program, we'd have been at the game on Friday night.

No doubt the Victorian Government has made some mistakes, but the lack of oversight by the Liberal Federal Government in aged care and their inept vaccine roll-out would lose them the impending election if the ALP weren't such an unelectable neoliberal disaster.Ā 

Has the Lib/Nat coalition got anything right? Ever?


Yes NT really concerned about being compromised. Ā Game offers no tourism benefits so they save $800k.Ā 
A huge hole in our financial coffers. Ā 
Ā 

SCG is the best venue. Ā Though Brisbane based lions supporters would still get in to the game but 1000 lions fans are better than 30,000 at the Gabba.Ā 
Ā 

ITS A BIG ā€œNO FROM MEā€Ā TO HAVE IT AT THE GABBAĀ 

NT is the one place in Australia where a hard border at all times makes sense. They have such a large number of vulnerable communities. The risk is too great if an outbreak was to happen and they don’t have the resources that big states have in terms of hospitals.Ā 
Can’t see us going there this week.Ā 


I saw it on fox with SCG next to our game. Just pleased game can be played. Agree with a no politics it is so refreshing to just focus on footy and shut out the worlds problems.Ā 

1 minute ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Yes NT really concerned about being compromised. Ā Game offers no tourism benefits so they save $800k.Ā 
A huge hole in our financial coffers. Ā 
Ā 

SCG is the best venue. Ā Though Brisbane based lions supporters would still get in to the game but 1000 lions fans are better than 30,000 at the Gabba.Ā 
Ā 

ITS A BIG ā€œNO FROM MEā€Ā TO HAVE IT AT THE GABBAĀ 

How does it offer no tourism benefits? Someone on here said recently they tried to get accomodation in Alice for the game and there was NOTHING available.Ā 

I find it hard to believe there are NO benefits, or otherwise why would they do the deal in the first place? I do note I get an ā€œExplore the NTā€ ad every time I watch video content on the MFC website, for starters (I can hear that catchy fluty song in my head now).

7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Let's curb the politics blame game. Not necessarily directed at you but to everyone.

+1

Ā 

people are demonstrating they have limited perspective on the entire issue and looking quite silly

Ā 
  • Author
1 minute ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Yes NT really concerned about being compromised. Ā Game offers no tourism benefits so they save $800k.Ā 
A huge hole in our financial coffers. Ā 
Ā 

SCG is the best venue. Ā Though Brisbane based lions supporters would still get in to the game but 1000 lions fans are better than 30,000 at the Gabba.Ā 
Ā 

ITS A BIG ā€œNO FROM MEā€Ā TO HAVE IT AT THE GABBAĀ 

If we are given the option of SCG and the Gabba I would prefer to take the SCG. It might however become a purely financial decision given the loss of the 800K (Alice Springs) and likely $1 Mil (Queens Birthday). Taking the Gabba gate might just be a case of cutting our financial losses than playing in front of an empty SCG. I doubt the 100s of NSW Dees and those Lions that travel south would even come close to what we could make playing at the Gabba.

It was earlier reported that Carlton were offered SCG or Optus Stadium next week to play West Coast and chose SCG. They didn't have the huge financial loss hanging over their heads and they are already in Sydney so why travel into the belly of the beast and play the Eagles on their flat track. They've understandably chosen the SCG.

We have a big decision to make. I would at least try to get our next 2 games vs the Lions at the G. We hardly ever seem to play them there.

Ā 

What’s interesting here is where the compensation and risk lies. For example if we don’t get the QB gate does the AFL give us QBW home ground next year as compo (they should)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 159 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies