Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Had a poor September, no doubt. Doesn't define him as a player though.

September is the business end of the Season. So it does define a large part in my view

 
  • Author
2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

No. I am talking about Tomlinson 

Not injured players 

 

What was Sidebottom excuse last year?

13 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Had a poor September, no doubt. Doesn't define him as a player though.

Right, but the posters who kept bringing up his prelim game a year or so back have a legitimate point yeh?

Tomlinson has been at GWS since their inception and has never been more than a bit player.

The fact that he was dropped in a final this year as a mature player says far more about how he valued. It's about his body of work.

I expect he'll help with our depth and provide competition for spots but as far as 'value' to our best 22 goes, I don't see much.

Edited by stevethemanjordan

 
2 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

September is the business end of the Season. So it does define a large part in my view

Sure, but I don't make my judgments on a couple of games.

Last year he had 21 disposals (15 kicks) and 7 marks in an elimination final.

The year before he had 26 disposals, 7 marks and 5 tackles in a prelim against the eventual premiers.

Worth looking deeper sometimes.

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

What was Sidebottom excuse last year?

What do you think of Tomlinson?

I am not interested in debating Sidebottom 


2 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Right, but the posters who kept bringing up his prelim game a year or so back have a legitimate point yeh?

Tomlinson has been at GWS since their inception and has never been more than a bit player.

The fact that he was dropped in a final this year as a mature player says far more about how he valued. It's about his body of work.

I expect he'll help with our depth and provide competition for spots but as far as 'value' to our best 22 goes, I don't see much.

Fair enough, we're all going to see things differently. You can take your view from the 1 game he was dropped, I'm taking mine from the 80+ where he wasn't.

Don't think anyone has said they're expecting a superstar.

Just now, Lord Nev said:

Sure, but I don't make my judgments on a couple of games.

Last year he had 21 disposals (15 kicks) and 7 marks in an elimination final.

The year before he had 26 disposals, 7 marks and 5 tackles in a prelim against the eventual premiers.

Worth looking deeper sometimes.

This year he played much deeper Finals than just an Elimination Final. 

I watched closely, that is why I am wondering what he is going to bring to the MFC to IMPROVE our chances...

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

What was Sidebottom excuse last year?

 

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

What do you think of Tomlinson?

I am not interested in debating Sidebottom 

See what happens when you try and talk footy DD and bring up relevant points. The toys get thrown out of the kot

 
Just now, Pennant St Dee said:

 

See what happens when you try and talk footy DD and bring up relevant points. The toys get thrown out of the kot

It’s Cot actually 

5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

This year he played much deeper Finals than just an Elimination Final. 

I watched closely, that is why I am wondering what he is going to bring to the MFC to IMPROVE our chances...

Did you even read my post mate? Read it again.


If I was a site admin things would look a bit different around here. As an example, in regard to Tomlinson I would make the following statement:

I hereby decree that any poster who is critical of recruiting Tomlinson (and costing us only salary cap space and a spot on the list I might add - an important consideration given the gws priority picks) is banned from at any point thereafter complaining about how bad the depth is at the MFC. 

The punishment for breaching this rule will be having to change your avatar to a picture of Mark Neeld. 

5 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Did you even read my post mate? Read it again.

Yes I did read it. And I also just watched the 2019 Finals series 

how isTomlinson going to IMPROVE our list?

We need far more than just depth...

5 minutes ago, binman said:

If I was a site admin things would look a bit different around here. As an example, in regard to Tomlinson I would make the following statement:

I hereby decree that any poster who is critical of recruiting Tomlinson (and costing us only salary cap space and a spot on the list I might add - an important consideration given the gws priority picks) is banned from at any point thereafter complaining about how bad the depth is at the MFC. 

The punishment for breaching this rule will be having to change your avatar to a picture of Mark Neeld. 

Please expand.  I'm not sure your statement proposal makes sense?

Oh I forget - this is demonland

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Yes I did read it. And I also just watched the 2019 Finals series 

how isTomlinson going to IMPROVE our list?

We need far more than just depth...

He gives us a winger, a swingman and a backup ruck, which if you paid attention this year is sorely lacking.

Doesn't cost us a pick or a player. Important given our list spots vs draft picks situation.

Is a noted professional and great trainer.

Improves our depth, which if you paid attention this year is sorely lacking.

Has barely missed a game for years through injury, which if you paid attention this year is very important.

I'm not sure what else you want from a free agent willing to go to the 17th placed team?

You seem to demand improvement but not really understand how that actually looks.

 

25 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Fair enough, we're all going to see things differently. You can take your view from the 1 game he was dropped, I'm taking mine from the 80+ where he wasn't.

Don't think anyone has said they're expecting a superstar.

"Body-of-work".

Let's say it together. Ready?

"Bodyyyy Offff Worrkkkkk".


1 minute ago, stevethemanjordan said:

"Body-of-work".

Let's say it together. Ready?

"Bodyyyy Offff Worrkkkkk".

 

31 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

The fact that he was dropped in a final this year as a mature player says far more about how he valued. It's about his body of work.

1 game  = "body of work" in your books. That's fine. Tells me enough about how much to value your opinion on this.

 

45 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Right, but the posters who kept bringing up his prelim game a year or so back have a legitimate point yeh?

Tomlinson has been at GWS since their inception and has never been more than a bit player.

The fact that he was dropped in a final this year as a mature player says far more about how he valued. It's about his body of work.

I expect he'll help with our depth and provide competition for spots but as far as 'value' to our best 22 goes, I don't see much.

 

12 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

1 game  = "body of work" in your books. That's fine. Tells me enough about how much to value your opinion on this.

 

Getting dropped for a clutch final having played over 100 league games says a lot about ones body-of-work, how they've developed over that period and where they currently sit in the pecking order on a clubs list. He had two howlers after that.

His body of work is a far more accurate assessment of his value compared to a single final a year ago where he played very well.

The outlier is that final. He has had far many more games of average football than great football.

If you still don't understand, I don't mind. Someone else can explain it to you.

3 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Getting dropped for a clutch final having played over 100 league games says a lot about ones body-of-work

His body of work is a far more accurate assessment of his value compared to a single final a year ago where he played very well.

STMJ: 'Judge him on one game'

Also STMJ: 'Don't judge him on one game'

Ok then.

56 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

1 game  = "body of work" in your books. That's fine. Tells me enough about how much to value your opinion on this.

 

 

 

Edited by binman
not so sure you have


1 hour ago, Clint Bizkit said:

He's exactly the kind of player we don't need.

Without knowing what the rationale for recruiting Tomlinson is I suspect that he is a solid citizen who can release other players to play in other positions.

May playing marking Wing/forward.

I suspect that we will be developing a number of forwards from within which should include OMac and Petty

 

21 hours ago, Garbo said:

So who do you suggest going after instead as doing nothing is going backwards, he will be a best 22 won’t cost picks and would command no more than a modest contract. If it’s a matter of him or frost I’d take him, he offers more utility round the ground and if our backline is fit frost wouldn’t be in the 22 imo as it is rare you need a permanent 3rd tall in the backline these days. A best 22 over a backup is the no brainer on that case

anyone with pace & composure

3 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

Fair enough, we're all going to see things differently. You can take your view from the 1 game he was dropped, I'm taking mine from the 80+ where he wasn't.

Don't think anyone has said they're expecting a superstar.

It will aslo maybe puta rocket up a couple players, get better or you wont get agame, ANB, Hannan these types, pressure will be on.

 
13 minutes ago, Demon3 said:

It will aslo maybe puta rocket up a couple players, get better or you wont get agame, ANB, Hannan these types, pressure will be on.

Yes spot on, they all need to lift next year.

4 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

 

See what happens when you try and talk footy DD and bring up relevant points. The toys get thrown out of the kot

P St D; is this an example of the Mathias Cormann effect?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

    • 255 replies