Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

This thread is further proof of something I learned very early in my legal career. Put 4 people on different corners of an intersection, to view an accident occurring in the intersection and you will get 4 different versions of what happened if you ask them what they saw.

As for the Tribunal,  given we are challenging the penalty, I would assume we have the Lions on side to explain why Berry didn’t come back on and to downgrade the medium impact by showing no injury. 

4 minutes ago, Pipefitter said:

Is he supposed to move out of the way?

For Pete's sake am I watching the same footage as others. Or is there two versions. May dropped his shoulder and moved into him deliberately to drop him. Which he succeeded in doing. Which is why he got reported. Stupid

Yes he could have moved out the way. But that is not really an option. So instead he could have achieved the aim of blocking him by simply bracing and protecting himself. And he would not have been reported. Instead he made the decision to bump (A much smaller player) and therefore put himself in a situation where a report becomes possible. Stupid. And what did he gain? Nothing.

So now we face the chance of meeting a side loaded with tall forwards without our biggest and best kpd. Great. Good on him. Smart. Not.

Even if gets off the appeal is s palaver we don't need ahead of round one.

The club will say the right things but internally they will be fuming.

 
2 minutes ago, binman said:

 

The club will say the right things but internally they will be fuming.

I doubt it.

 

It was off the ball, and head high so he deserves a week.

Of course I’d love him to get off , but would be shocked if he did.


Clarifying two things: 

- Berry is taller than May while somewhat lighter. 

- May had an option:  he could have gone for the ball which is where Berry was heading instead of 'bracing' for Berry contact or at least gone for the ball after Berry fell instead of walking the other way.

Nonetheless, imv it is not 'medium' impact and the criteria applied to assess it are rubbish in this instance.

Very pleased the club has shown the mettle to appeal.  It shows we will start standing up for ourselves and our players.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

of course he can't step out of the way. he just needed to not catch him on the chin.

having said that I am glad we are appealing.  I reckon we are a good chance to downgrade the impact to low

It happens in a split second. If accidental connection is made to the chin - as it may have been the case in this instance - you need to establish intent. I believe May braced himself and that's where the collision impacted. It's not as though he set out to maim him...

The points of May having no other option are debatable but the fact of the matter is there's no way that should be medium impact

 
8 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

It was off the ball, and head high so he deserves a week.

Of course I’d love him to get off , but would be shocked if he did.

 

Then explain how Burton got off the Higgins hit...

Rules for some...

 

Edited by The Stigga

16 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

It was off the ball, and head high so he deserves a week.

Of course I’d love him to get off , but would be shocked if he did.

it wasn't off the ball at all. the ball was in the immediate area. Berry handpasses a split second before the bump/block.


1 hour ago, poita said:

May is a dummy, and clearly hasn't learned from his nine previous suspensions. I would much rather he took the week now and spent some time reflecting, rather than doing something equally stupid later in the year and costing the team when it matters more.

Was contact unavoidable? Possibly. Was it necessary to turn and collect a smaller player with hip and shoulder with first contact to the head? Clearly not. 

As much as there have been numerous other MRP decisions that are completely illogical, I don't have a problem with this one.

Just a typical garbage post by you.

4 minutes ago, DemonLad5 said:

The points of May having no other option are debatable but the fact of the matter is there's no way that should be medium impact

 

Agreed, the May decision has been tacitly described as an 'optics' issue

But then how many suspensions have been based on the 'result'

 

Edited by The Stigga

10 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

It was off the ball, and head high so he deserves a week.

Of course I’d love him to get off , but would be shocked if he did.

Garbage

11 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

It was off the ball, and head high so he deserves a week.

Of course I’d love him to get off , but would be shocked if he did.

Oh he'll get off.

18 hours ago, clark's kick said:

It's stupid play by May.

You can't deny he moves towards berry to make contact.

Yes, he wouldn't be suspend if he played for collingwood or essendon. Yes, he wouldn't be suspended if his name was dangerfield or selwood. And yes, it's horribly inconsistent, and will undoubtedly be inconsistent with other decisions from that moron christian this year.

But May stupidly put himself in the position to be judged by an inconsistent system.

Control what you can control.

It was dumb. I hope someone is privately tearing strips off him, especially if he is on $900k a year. It was a practice game ffs!

What do you propose he does? Move out of his way, so he then can receive a handball back.  You’re allowed to block someone to stop him moving to the next contest


28 minutes ago, The Stigga said:

I doubt it.

 

You're kidding right. 

5 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

What do you propose he does? Move out of his way, so he then can receive a handball back.  You’re allowed to block someone to stop him moving to the next contest

No you're not.

In fact it should have been a 50 metre penalty against May for doing exactly this.

18 minutes ago, dieter said:

It happens in a split second. If accidental connection is made to the chin - as it may have been the case in this instance - you need to establish intent. I believe May braced himself and that's where the collision impacted. It's not as though he set out to maim him...

Nup. He didn't set out to 'maim' him. he did try to hurt him. And succeeded.

He is very lucky he didn't get him more on the head, say flush on the nose, which easily could have happened if Berry had dropped even a couple of centimeters more. Something that is completely out of May's control.Then we would be talking high contact and 5-6 weeks. All for what? What did he achieve by bumping him?


3 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

Off course it was I am the President of Mensa Australia.

And you manage a spelling mistake in a sentence containing 11 words?

Standards at Mensa Oz must have slipped since i left. 

8 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

 

In fact it should have been a 50 metre penalty against May for doing exactly this.

Speaking of 50 metre penalties, the new rule is the invention of an idiot.

The umpires boss one week before the season starts has admitted that the umpires don’t know exactly how to set the mark and the player penalised basically has to let the infringed player run away or play in without any pressure. I am struggling to think of a worse rule.

Just now, binman said:

And you manage a spelling mistake in a sentence containing 11 words?

Standards at Mensa Oz must have slipped since i left. 

It Is based on intelligence, not spelling, any fool can spell correctli.

 
2 minutes ago, binman said:

Nup. He didn't set out to 'maim' him. he did try to hurt him. And succeeded.

He is very lucky he didn't get him more on the head, say flush on the nose, which easily could have happened if Berry had dropped even a couple of centimeters more. Something that is completely out of May's control.Then we would be talking high contact and 5-6 weeks. All for what? What did he achieve by bumping him?

congrats for trying binman...some on here just don't get the modern game and the all out effort to protect the head.

I hope we haven't got a perennial offender in May. With lists so finely balanced we cannot afford suspensions.This or at the latest next has to be our year.

14 minutes ago, binman said:

You're kidding right. 

No. Disappointed perhaps, for the situation they are in facing selection should he not play. But 'fuming', i think that's a bit of hyperbole.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 40 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 489 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 190 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland