Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Really bad break for Nic Nat. Hope he recovers quickly and plays again.

Given Max Gawn's rise to the premier ruckman in the Afl for at least the last two seasons has anyone given thought that if we had chosen Nic Nat  instead of JW Maxy most probably wouldn't be in our team and possibly playing for another club. So we made the right choice I reckon. Just food for thought. I know who is the more valuable player.

 

I don’t rate Nic Nat as a fantastic player, but I certainly see why fans (and media) love him.  

With that said, knowing the attachment and devotion that he has to his family, he would have been traded back west after his first contract over here was up.

But in response to the op, I honestly haven’t thought about the ‘what if we had taken nic nat’ for a very long time.

 
36 minutes ago, hells bells said:

Bailey Fritsch > Nik Nat

No.

6 hours ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I don’t rate Nic Nat as a fantastic player, but I certainly see why fans (and media) love him.  

With that said, knowing the attachment and devotion that he has to his family, he would have been traded back west after his first contract over here was up.

But in response to the op, I honestly haven’t thought about the ‘what if we had taken nic nat’ for a very long time.

I spoke to Jim Stynes at a function just before the ‘08 draft, he was worried about the go home factor as well. It was a big factor in picking Watts, even though I had the feeling NicNat was rated higher.


Nic Nat is the most overrated and overhyped player in the league. He has a neat highlight real but if he looked like Jack Fitzpatrick and played for Gold Coast you would hardly hear of him.

Edited by FarNorthernD

9 minutes ago, FarNorthernD said:

Nic Nat is the most overrated and overhyped player in the league. He has a neat highlight real but if he looked like Jack Fitzpatrick and played for Gold Coast you would hardly hear of him.

He is an exceptional tap ruckman when fit and for him to do what he's done on 60% TOG this year is very impressive.

The perception of him being overrated was in part due to the 2012 AA guernsey he got when he didn't deserve it.

1 hour ago, McQueen said:

He is an exceptional tap ruckman when fit and for him to do what he's done on 60% TOG this year is very impressive.

The perception of him being overrated was in part due to the 2012 AA guernsey he got when he didn't deserve it.

And that was a Gerard Healy special

He stans for Nic 

 
1 hour ago, McQueen said:

He is an exceptional tap ruckman when fit and for him to do what he's done on 60% TOG this year is very impressive.

The perception of him being overrated was in part due to the 2012 AA guernsey he got when he didn't deserve it.

Gawn averages 46 hit outs this year against NNat 30

Gawn has more marks 4.8 to NNat 1.7 a match

17 disposals to 11

And whilst Nic Nat has 110 less disposals than Max for the season he has more clangers - 56 to MG 41. About the only stat Nic Nat wins in is average tackles. 

I appreciate that stats aren’t everything but this is a complete drubbing. I would love to know the score involvements for each.

 And having Max on the ground for 85% of the time means we have the luxury of an extra runner whereas NN’s average of 57% means they have to carry an extra ruckman. 

Yet despite all that Nic Nat was, till recently, in the conversation for All Australian along with Max and Grundy. He is the definition of overrated as far as I’m concerned 

 

12 minutes ago, FarNorthernD said:

Gawn averages 46 hit outs this year against NNat 30

Gawn has more marks 4.8 to NNat 1.7 a match

17 disposals to 11

And whilst Nic Nat has 110 less disposals than Max for the season he has more clangers - 56 to MG 41. About the only stat Nic Nat wins in is average tackles. 

I appreciate that stats aren’t everything but this is a complete drubbing. I would love to know the score involvements for each.

 And having Max on the ground for 85% of the time means we have the luxury of an extra runner whereas NN’s average of 57% means they have to carry an extra ruckman. 

Yet despite all that Nic Nat was, till recently, in the conversation for All Australian along with Max and Grundy. He is the definition of overrated as far as I’m concerned 

 

Was he though?

Its been pretty obvious he has been a rung or 2 below Max and Brodie all year.


28 minutes ago, FarNorthernD said:

Gawn averages 46 hit outs this year against NNat 30

Gawn has more marks 4.8 to NNat 1.7 a match

17 disposals to 11

And whilst Nic Nat has 110 less disposals than Max for the season he has more clangers - 56 to MG 41. About the only stat Nic Nat wins in is average tackles. 

I appreciate that stats aren’t everything but this is a complete drubbing. I would love to know the score involvements for each.

 And having Max on the ground for 85% of the time means we have the luxury of an extra runner whereas NN’s average of 57% means they have to carry an extra ruckman. 

Yet despite all that Nic Nat was, till recently, in the conversation for All Australian along with Max and Grundy. He is the definition of overrated as far as I’m concerned 

 

I don't disagree with you for a second that Max is the superior ruckman and as you've pointed out in your last sentence, the media pump Nic up more than anyone and it's essentially what earned him the guernsey back in '12 when I think it was Sauce Jacobs to wear.

But Nic Nat's ruck taps can be sublime and on par with Gawn's this year.

21 minutes ago, FarNorthernD said:

Gawn averages 46 hit outs this year against NNat 30

Gawn has more marks 4.8 to NNat 1.7 a match

17 disposals to 11

And whilst Nic Nat has 110 less disposals than Max for the season he has more clangers - 56 to MG 41. About the only stat Nic Nat wins in is average tackles. 

I appreciate that stats aren’t everything but this is a complete drubbing. I would love to know the score involvements for each.

 And having Max on the ground for 85% of the time means we have the luxury of an extra runner whereas NN’s average of 57% means they have to carry an extra ruckman. 

Yet despite all that Nic Nat was, till recently, in the conversation for All Australian along with Max and Grundy. He is the definition of overrated as far as I’m concerned 

 

The reason his TOG is so low is because he’s been building his fitness base back up throughout the year. He was averaging 65% the last three weeks, which while still low compared to Gawn and Grundy was approaching the 70%+ the Eagles would’ve been aiming for come September.

Naitanui doesn’t spend as much time on the ground and frankly with his hitout win percentage he doesn’t need to. It’s no coincidence that the Eagles are flying this season with what was considered to be a weakened midfield compared to last season. A big reason is the dreadlocked bloke in the middle. 

Even putting aside his freakish ability in the ruck, there are certain players that make the team walk taller and he’s one of those That can’t be denied. The Eagles record with and without him playing speaks for itself.

The view that NicNat is overrated is an extremely outdated one. He’s a star.

If you think he is overrated, take a look at West Coast's performance when he is and isn't in the team. They are a top 4 side with, mid-table without. Which says just as much about Nic Nat than it does of WC. That sort of influence on a team cannot be understated. I think he's a very good player that can totally alter the defensive structure of a team.

Anyway, he's out for the rest of the season so in my mind that means Max takes precedence.

AA inclusion should be based on your impact all of season.


Your Honour what is the Verdict ?  It is Max Gawn hands down.  Thank you your Honour, I rest my case.  

                                                                                          CASE DISMISSED.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 120 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
    • 33 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Angry
      • Like
    • 252 replies