Jump to content

Filling the hole left by Jake Lever’s injury

PaulRB
PaulRB
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is they either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

Edited by ProDee

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    6 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

    Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

    I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is the either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

    Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

    Only 188cm, that surprises me...

    As I posted earlier Josh Gibson played the same role at Hawthorn at 189cm and they seemed to go ok.

    Howe does similar at Collingwood.

    I think Smith could be a good option. Has speed, good overhead, good leap...only thing is does he have the footy IQ for the role?

  • Quote

    As many have mentioned, it doesn't have to be a like for like replacement. 

    The worries are the five options (Wagner, Frost, Smith, Keilty and Hunt) lack the composure to play the Lever role. The disposal of Frost, Hunt and Wagner is inconsistent as well.

    Hibberd isn't good enough in the air to step into the role. If he was we could bring Hunt back.

    I have a feeling they will go back to Wagner.

  • Quote
    •  
    48 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

    As many have mentioned, it doesn't have to be a like for like replacement. 

    The worries are the five options (Wagner, Frost, Smith, Keilty and Hunt) lack the composure to play the Lever role. The disposal of Frost, Hunt and Wagner is inconsistent as well.

    Hibberd isn't good enough in the air to step into the role. If he was we could bring Hunt back.

    I have a feeling they will go back to Wagner.

    Hope not

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Try not to disturb existing players from the roles they are currently playing.

    They are doing this with their eyes closed at the moment.

    I have read that the only open day of training is on Friday.

    I believe that the day/s of closed training will have 3 guys playing levers role.

    The one who does this the best gets the nod.

    The 3 who are in the box seat are Frost, Smith and Wagner.

    If Tim Smith doesn't pull up well, Pedo should be his replacement, although having a Weideman playing against them again could be good.

    Billy Stretch has been BOG 3 out of the past 4 games in the VFL (although a shocking kick, unless he has ironed that out.)

    So if someone needs a rest he is a good replacement.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    8 hours ago, TGR said:

    I think us MFC supporters (especially our FD) overrate Lever and underrate Frost.  Brian Taylor elevated Stringer to AA-status, and I reckon, did the same with Lever.

     

     

    Good opportunity for Frost now.  He needs to ignore the groans of the simpletons when he gets caught HTB, and continue to grow and take risks.

     

     

     

     

    The idea that Brian Taylor could elevate anyone to All-Australian is rather... interesting.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    7 hours ago, ProDee said:

    You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

    Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

    I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is they either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

    Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

     

    Does the intercept defender need to be a tall? i.e. if Hibberd is to fill this role, does he need to play on a taller player also? Surely Frost can come in & still be accountable on a tall, without being required to have great footy IQ.

    I understand the opposition will try to force Hibberd to be accountable, but I think we'd be able to cope.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

     

    Does the intercept defender need to be a tall? i.e. if Hibberd is to fill this role, does he need to play on a taller player also? Surely Frost can come in & still be accountable on a tall, without being required to have great footy IQ.

    I understand the opposition will try to force Hibberd to be accountable, but I think we'd be able to cope.

    I don't believe they need to be a giant but they've obviously got to be able to hold their own in the air. Also they have to have the strength to go one on one or have the strength and power to impact and spoil in the air. 

    If you are going to be played as the intercept defender you need footy IQ to choose the moments when or when not to run off your man or where you are protecting space. Personally I think that is where Frost has been pretty bad in the past and gets lost ball watching. You need to know when to go to a certain contest, when to drop deeper behind play, how to hold your position in the zone and not get lost by ball watching or following the play. If it was just about Frost being accountable and locking down one on one I'd assume he'd be capable, but it's not just one on one defending which I believe is the problem. Also I think the intercept defender needs to be a safe set of hands so to speak and Frost is far from safe with the ball in hand.

    Hibberd can probably play the role but it will take away from what he is good at in my opinion. His strength is his distribution and running off half back as well as winning the ball at ground level. I'm not sure he's our best option in the air and I don't know if he plays tall so to speak.

  • Quote
    •  
    2 hours ago, Mach5 said:

     

    The idea that Brian Taylor could elevate anyone to All-Australian is rather... interesting.  incredibly weird and if true an indictment of the AA process.

     

  • Quote

    Don't mind this from Greeny.

    I'd certainly give Weids a go at CHB for Casey for a few weeks. I think he'd hold a lot of marks he gets his hands on up forward and his clean handballing and tackling would be useful. It would help his kicking under pressure and second efforts as well.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    13 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Don't mind this from Greeny.

    I'd certainly give Weids a go at CHB for Casey for a few weeks. I think he'd hold a lot of marks he gets his hands on up forward and his clean handballing and tackling would be useful. It would help his kicking under pressure and second efforts as well.

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    Edited by Petraccattack

  • Quote
    8 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    I think he should be tried down back, suspect he has all the tools needed to be a mobile intercept back, depends if he can read the play back there. He doesn’t mind tackling people but we need to give him time there to prove he can play the role. 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Petraccattack said:

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    A lot of key forwards learn their craft as a back. Think back to Nick Reiwoldt, David Netiz, the G train all spent time back to master their craft. 

    I just dont think putting Weid in as a intercept back would be a smart move, he would need to take more of a one on one defensive role allowing hibberd to play the intercept role. 

    The thing I do love about Weid is he gives a contest can bring the ball to ground, and competes when it does hit the deck, also seems to be a clean kick on both sides. 

  • Quote
    35 minutes ago, GCDee said:

    A lot of key forwards learn their craft as a back. Think back to Nick Reiwoldt, David Netiz, the G train all spent time back to master their craft. 

    I just dont think putting Weid in as a intercept back would be a smart move, he would need to take more of a one on one defensive role allowing hibberd to play the intercept role. 

    The thing I do love about Weid is he gives a contest can bring the ball to ground, and competes when it does hit the deck, also seems to be a clean kick on both sides. 

    different game back then GCD. It used to be the semi soft position if there ever was such a thing in AFL. But these days,  with the forward press youve to be really competitive  at ground level too,  and Im just not convinced re Weid and that part of his game. Love to be wrong on this though. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    2 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

    different game back then GCD. It used to be the semi soft position if there ever was such a thing in AFL. But these days,  with the forward press youve to be really competitive  at ground level too,  and Im just not convinced re Weid and that part of his game. Love to be wrong on this though. 

    yep ... in the even older days HBF was where a young player often debuted....It was not considered a vital position unlike say CHB.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 11

      Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

        • Thanks
      • 189 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Sydney

      The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Brisbane

      “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Southport

      The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Sydney

      Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

        • Thanks
      • 458 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Brisbane

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 35 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All