Jump to content

Filling the hole left by Jake Lever’s injury

PaulRB
PaulRB
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is they either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

Edited by ProDee

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    6 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

    Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

    I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is the either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

    Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

    Only 188cm, that surprises me...

    As I posted earlier Josh Gibson played the same role at Hawthorn at 189cm and they seemed to go ok.

    Howe does similar at Collingwood.

    I think Smith could be a good option. Has speed, good overhead, good leap...only thing is does he have the footy IQ for the role?

  • Quote

    As many have mentioned, it doesn't have to be a like for like replacement. 

    The worries are the five options (Wagner, Frost, Smith, Keilty and Hunt) lack the composure to play the Lever role. The disposal of Frost, Hunt and Wagner is inconsistent as well.

    Hibberd isn't good enough in the air to step into the role. If he was we could bring Hunt back.

    I have a feeling they will go back to Wagner.

  • Quote
    •  
    48 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

    As many have mentioned, it doesn't have to be a like for like replacement. 

    The worries are the five options (Wagner, Frost, Smith, Keilty and Hunt) lack the composure to play the Lever role. The disposal of Frost, Hunt and Wagner is inconsistent as well.

    Hibberd isn't good enough in the air to step into the role. If he was we could bring Hunt back.

    I have a feeling they will go back to Wagner.

    Hope not

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Try not to disturb existing players from the roles they are currently playing.

    They are doing this with their eyes closed at the moment.

    I have read that the only open day of training is on Friday.

    I believe that the day/s of closed training will have 3 guys playing levers role.

    The one who does this the best gets the nod.

    The 3 who are in the box seat are Frost, Smith and Wagner.

    If Tim Smith doesn't pull up well, Pedo should be his replacement, although having a Weideman playing against them again could be good.

    Billy Stretch has been BOG 3 out of the past 4 games in the VFL (although a shocking kick, unless he has ironed that out.)

    So if someone needs a rest he is a good replacement.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    8 hours ago, TGR said:

    I think us MFC supporters (especially our FD) overrate Lever and underrate Frost.  Brian Taylor elevated Stringer to AA-status, and I reckon, did the same with Lever.

     

     

    Good opportunity for Frost now.  He needs to ignore the groans of the simpletons when he gets caught HTB, and continue to grow and take risks.

     

     

     

     

    The idea that Brian Taylor could elevate anyone to All-Australian is rather... interesting.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
    7 hours ago, ProDee said:

    You don't need to be super tall to play the intercept role, but you need a good footy IQ.

    Doedee at Adelaide is playing it at 188cm.

    I haven't seen enough of Joel Smith, but my guess is they either give him a go as Lever's direct replacement, or Hibberd takes over the role.

    Frost may come in, but I certainly can't see him playing as the intercept defender.

     

    Does the intercept defender need to be a tall? i.e. if Hibberd is to fill this role, does he need to play on a taller player also? Surely Frost can come in & still be accountable on a tall, without being required to have great footy IQ.

    I understand the opposition will try to force Hibberd to be accountable, but I think we'd be able to cope.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

     

    Does the intercept defender need to be a tall? i.e. if Hibberd is to fill this role, does he need to play on a taller player also? Surely Frost can come in & still be accountable on a tall, without being required to have great footy IQ.

    I understand the opposition will try to force Hibberd to be accountable, but I think we'd be able to cope.

    I don't believe they need to be a giant but they've obviously got to be able to hold their own in the air. Also they have to have the strength to go one on one or have the strength and power to impact and spoil in the air. 

    If you are going to be played as the intercept defender you need footy IQ to choose the moments when or when not to run off your man or where you are protecting space. Personally I think that is where Frost has been pretty bad in the past and gets lost ball watching. You need to know when to go to a certain contest, when to drop deeper behind play, how to hold your position in the zone and not get lost by ball watching or following the play. If it was just about Frost being accountable and locking down one on one I'd assume he'd be capable, but it's not just one on one defending which I believe is the problem. Also I think the intercept defender needs to be a safe set of hands so to speak and Frost is far from safe with the ball in hand.

    Hibberd can probably play the role but it will take away from what he is good at in my opinion. His strength is his distribution and running off half back as well as winning the ball at ground level. I'm not sure he's our best option in the air and I don't know if he plays tall so to speak.

  • Quote
    •  
    2 hours ago, Mach5 said:

     

    The idea that Brian Taylor could elevate anyone to All-Australian is rather... interesting.  incredibly weird and if true an indictment of the AA process.

     

  • Quote

    Don't mind this from Greeny.

    I'd certainly give Weids a go at CHB for Casey for a few weeks. I think he'd hold a lot of marks he gets his hands on up forward and his clean handballing and tackling would be useful. It would help his kicking under pressure and second efforts as well.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    13 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Don't mind this from Greeny.

    I'd certainly give Weids a go at CHB for Casey for a few weeks. I think he'd hold a lot of marks he gets his hands on up forward and his clean handballing and tackling would be useful. It would help his kicking under pressure and second efforts as well.

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    Edited by Petraccattack

  • Quote
    8 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    I think he should be tried down back, suspect he has all the tools needed to be a mobile intercept back, depends if he can read the play back there. He doesn’t mind tackling people but we need to give him time there to prove he can play the role. 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Petraccattack said:

     

    Can not imagine Weideman playing as a key backman.  Just doesn't look like it would suit him.

    But Jetta was reinvented as a gun back, T Mac as a gun forward.  So I am open to anything and I will back the coaching staff in all the way on whatever they try.

    A lot of key forwards learn their craft as a back. Think back to Nick Reiwoldt, David Netiz, the G train all spent time back to master their craft. 

    I just dont think putting Weid in as a intercept back would be a smart move, he would need to take more of a one on one defensive role allowing hibberd to play the intercept role. 

    The thing I do love about Weid is he gives a contest can bring the ball to ground, and competes when it does hit the deck, also seems to be a clean kick on both sides. 

  • Quote
    35 minutes ago, GCDee said:

    A lot of key forwards learn their craft as a back. Think back to Nick Reiwoldt, David Netiz, the G train all spent time back to master their craft. 

    I just dont think putting Weid in as a intercept back would be a smart move, he would need to take more of a one on one defensive role allowing hibberd to play the intercept role. 

    The thing I do love about Weid is he gives a contest can bring the ball to ground, and competes when it does hit the deck, also seems to be a clean kick on both sides. 

    different game back then GCD. It used to be the semi soft position if there ever was such a thing in AFL. But these days,  with the forward press youve to be really competitive  at ground level too,  and Im just not convinced re Weid and that part of his game. Love to be wrong on this though. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    2 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

    different game back then GCD. It used to be the semi soft position if there ever was such a thing in AFL. But these days,  with the forward press youve to be really competitive  at ground level too,  and Im just not convinced re Weid and that part of his game. Love to be wrong on this though. 

    yep ... in the even older days HBF was where a young player often debuted....It was not considered a vital position unlike say CHB.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 10 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 210 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Geelong

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Thanks
      • 58 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All