Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

i wonder if any demonlander has the full set?

If they have DC     They are prob broke

 
1 minute ago, Bossdog said:

If they have DC     They are prob broke

...and definitely not the "full quid"...!

12 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Is the away/alternative the same one this season? The lovely little royal blue number.

I don't think there is an Away Jumper per se. I thought we only wore the alternate strip when we are away and it clashes with the home team. If it doesn't clash with the home team then we wear our regular strip unless it's ANZAC day, Indigenous Round, Heritage Round, Breast Cancer Awareness Round or some other combination.

 

Nice, but not $300 nice.

34 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Is the away/alternative the same one this season? The lovely little royal blue number.

Red back jumper


Just now, Demonland said:

Are we using the Red back jumper this year? Are we only using it when there is a slight clash? Royal Blue for big clashes?

Both

 

57 minutes ago, Bossdog said:

So.....Let me get this right....

We now have       A home jumper

                              An away jumper

                              An alternitive Jumper

                              An ANZAC day jumper

                              A pink breast cancer jumper

                              An aboriginal jumper      And now a 160 jumper    

I feeling a bit confused

Not quite right, but yes it is a lot of jumpers.

  • Home (navy blue)
  • Clash 1 (navy blue with red back)
  • Clash 2 (royal blue)
  • Anzac Day
  • BCNA (assuming they are doing it this year)
  • Indigenous
  • 160 year

 

1 hour ago, Vagg said:

Sorry, DV.  I don't mean to be difficult.  But, every time someone has a go at Collingwood's alternate jumper I have to shake my head.  As much as I hate that team, the fact is their traditional jumper is predominantly BLACK, while their alternate is predominantly WHITE, and works perfectly well as a clash jumper...

And, as Essendon now have a predominantly red clash jumper, we really have no grounds for having a go at them any longer, either.

And, finally, as ours is now red & blue, kinda think the old clash jumper argument that raises its head every year is pretty much a non-subject this year...

Yeah.  I know.  Off subject!  Sorry guys!  Back on subject, I like the 160 Yr jumper!  (But, as stated earlier in this thread, my $300 will be going towards 10 bottles of 1495 Scotch.  (Yep, I know I'm a cheapskate on BOTH fronts!  LOL)

Whisky review #21: 1495 Blended Scotch Whisky

Here's one to avoid, Read on at your own peril! This whisky is called 1495 which refers to the first mention in historic text of the distillation of whisky in Scotland. I could go on but this whiskey doesn't deserve the attention. This is bad whisky! My lowest scoring whisky yet!

http://kevlikeswhiskey.blogspot.com.au/2016/06/whisky-review-22-1495-blended-scotch.html

6 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Whisky review #21: 1495 Blended Scotch Whisky

Here's one to avoid, Read on at your own peril! This whisky is called 1495 which refers to the first mention in historic text of the distillation of whisky in Scotland. I could go on but this whiskey doesn't deserve the attention. This is bad whisky! My lowest scoring whisky yet!

http://kevlikeswhiskey.blogspot.com.au/2016/06/whisky-review-22-1495-blended-scotch.html

LOL.  Tastes good to my poor, old palate, and the price is right.  What more can I say...?!

32 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Are we using the Red back jumper this year? Are we only using it when there is a slight clash? Royal Blue for big clashes?

redback vs Dogs & Saints I think (maybe one other?) royal blue for the rest


2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

$349.99 :lol:

ok then, i'll skip the free scarf next year in favour of the merchandise discount

You win the flag MFC and I'll buy one... deal?

7 hours ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

To be honest, I'm not sure we need to be celebrating the club's birth every 10 years. It should be every 25 to 50 at most.

This just seems unnecessary.

I don’t disagree with you Colin- but... what I do like is the fact that (at the moment) we are the only team that can have one!?


4 hours ago, Bossdog said:

So.....Let me get this right....

We now have       A home jumper

                              An away jumper

                              An alternitive Jumper

                              An ANZAC day jumper

                              A pink breast cancer jumper

                              An aboriginal jumper      And now a 160 jumper    

I feeling a bit confused

and lets hope by season end we have a Grand Final addition one to add to the collection 

  • Author

I'm a bit confused about it.

Are the only names appearing on the guernsey are from the people that pay the $300?

So if only 50 people buy into it, there will be 50 names printed on?

 

I assumed it had all past and present player’s name on it (as seen in the image) and your name would be printed on the back between the shoulders. But given the time they’re taking to manufacture I’d suggest I’m wrong. 

I don’t really want to pay $300 for a jumper with a heap of random names on it. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 383 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies