Jump to content

PAMPERED EAGLES-UMPIRES PET

Bobby McKenzie
Bobby McKenzie
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

While waiting for trade information I did a little research into the free kick count (for and against) and was flabbergasted at the difference between West Coast and the non pampered Demons. Actually, I was not only shocked but annoyed that there could be such a big difference between us and them. We know of course that there are many 'duckers' in their team but surely this doesn't explain the huge discrepancy.

Over the last 10 seasons Eagles have received 4768 frees FOR as against 3584 paid AGAINST them. A difference in their favour of 752 frees! In all of the 10 seasons West Coast had been ahead in the free kick count.

Melbourne, on the other hand, has received just 4071 frees and had 4186 against. A difference of NEGATIVE 115.( That's an overall difference of 867). So what is going on here? Are we breaking the rules or are the umps being influenced by the vocal crowd at Subiaco or what?

In my search I could find no other team that could in anyway rival the Eagles. They sure have been given a marvellous run by the men in charge.

  • Quote
    •  

    I brought this fact up a few weeks ago.

    They just get so many more free kicks at their home games than any other club. It really is a joke that the umpires can be swayed that regularly by the crowd.

  • Quote
    • Author

    I brought this fact up a few weeks ago.

    They just get so many more free kicks at their home games than any other club. It really is a joke that the umpires can be swayed that regularly by the crowd.

    I just looked up the Dockers stats. They are worse off with us with a negative score of 200. So their home crowd don't achieve the same as the Eagles crowd. Confusing isn't it?

  • Quote
    •  

    The numbers don't seem to add up. Eagles +1184, MFC -485, 1669 differential overall. ?

  • Quote

    While waiting for trade information I did a little research into the free kick count (for and against) and was flabbergasted at the difference between West Coast and the non pampered Demons. Actually, I was not only shocked but annoyed that there could be such a big difference between us and them. We know of course that there are many 'duckers' in their team but surely this doesn't explain the huge discrepancy.

    Over the last 10 seasons Eagles have received 4768 frees FOR as against 3584 paid AGAINST them. A difference in their favour of 752 frees! In all of the 10 seasons West Coast had been ahead in the free kick count.

    Melbourne, on the other hand, has received just 3701 frees and had 4186 against. A difference of NEGATIVE 115.( That's an overall difference of 867). So what is going on here? Are we breaking the rules or are the umps being influenced by the vocal crowd at Subiaco or what?

    In my search I could find no other team that could in anyway rival the Eagles. They sure have been given a marvellous run by the men in charge.

    I agree entirely with your point, but I worry about your math skills.

    4768 - 3584 = 1184

    3701 - 4186 = -485

    Thus WC have a comparative advantage of 1669 free kicks over us over your ten year sample.

  • Quote

    Back in the 50's & 60's The Dees got the favour of most umpires. Although back then there was just one field umpire.

    But we had Alan Nash and Bob Nunn.

    You could almost chalk in a win if Alan Nash got us, Bob Nunn had a little less average.

    Jack Irving was a toss of the coin.

    So nothing really has changed over the years.

  • Quote

    Wasnt there a WA umpy in the Grand Final? Didnt help em much there....hehe.

  • Quote

    I tend to agree they get the rub of the green. Walker was dragged off it in the 10 yard square a few years ago that should have cost WCE a Prelim. As it was Carlton who were the victims, didn't care much at the time. Same with North in recent Prelim there - decisive decisions went West.

    Your stats warrant further scrutiny.

    If there is a 1600 differential over 10 seasons that is 160 annually.

    Most of the past decade they have been "better" than us; three GF and a flag v well....

    0ver a season 160 FF translates to 7 a game. So if 50 frees were awarded in a game - maybe they would get 28, we receive 21. Generally better teams get more frees cos they are more skilled. Poorer sides less so, infringe more.

    Frees aren't meant to be 50/50 in a match.

    Agree, the critical ones appear to go their way.

    Your Freo stats are interesting.

  • Quote
    •  

    You watch Geelongs Sky-rocket next year with both Selwood boys there.

  • Quote
    • Author

    I agree entirely with your point, but I worry about your math skills.

    4768 - 3584 = 1184

    3701 - 4186 = -485

    Thus WC have a comparative advantage of 1669 free kicks over us over your ten year sample.

    To arrive at the figure of 752, I added up the difference for each year,e.g. 2015 461for 376 against = 85, 2014 382 for 335 against = 47 and so on. I agree and so does my calculator, that the figures you quoted are correct. A mathematical puzzle? I am a retired teacher but mathematics was not my forte.

  • Quote

    • Author

    I tend to agree they get the rub of the green. Walker was dragged off it in the 10 yard square a few years ago that should have cost WCE a Prelim. As it was Carlton who were the victims, didn't care much at the time. Same with North in recent Prelim there - decisive decisions went West.

    Your stats warrant further scrutiny.

    If there is a 1600 differential over 10 seasons that is 160 annually.

    Most of the past decade they have been "better" than us; three GF and a flag v well....

    0ver a season 160 FF translates to 7 a game. So if 50 frees were awarded in a game - maybe they would get 28, we receive 21. Generally better teams get more frees cos they are more skilled. Poorer sides less so, infringe more.

    Frees aren't meant to be 50/50 in a match.

    Agree, the critical ones appear to go their way.

    Your Freo stats are interesting.

    You mentioned how better teams get more frees. I took a look at Hawthorn - 4527 for 4848 against a negative score of -321. Hope my maths is correct this time.

  • Quote

    Though stats don't tell the whole story. In reality its not how many free's you get, it wheres on the field and when. The recent North prelim is a pure example, swung the momentum of the game completely in WC's favour. Free against play in front of goal.

    We tend to never get those, just useless one's around the square which is really neutral space on the ground.

  • Quote

    I tend to agree they get the rub of the green. Walker was dragged off it in the 10 yard square a few years ago that should have cost WCE a Prelim. As it was Carlton who were the victims, didn't care much at the time. Same with North in recent Prelim there - decisive decisions went West.

    Your stats warrant further scrutiny.

    If there is a 1600 differential over 10 seasons that is 160 annually.

    Most of the past decade they have been "better" than us; three GF and a flag v well....

    0ver a season 160 FF translates to 7 a game. So if 50 frees were awarded in a game - maybe they would get 28, we receive 21. Generally better teams get more frees cos they are more skilled. Poorer sides less so, infringe more.

    Frees aren't meant to be 50/50 in a match.

    Agree, the critical ones appear to go their way.

    Your Freo stats are interesting.

    Agree with the thrust of your post radar, however for all games this year the average number of frees paid was 36 (35.76).

    So with the Eagles at +7, that translates to a 21-14 or 22-15 type result. 50% more frees. Every game.

  • Quote

    Yep they do get the rub of the green at home. But.

    Over that ten year period they have been premiers and runners up so have been at the pointy end of the ladder and usually those teams do get more frees.

    Factor in they had Judd and he got lots of frees due to every one trying to stop him, also cousins and Kerr. And then they had their duckers, especially Hams and Selwood raising his arm.

    To compare to us who have been at the bottom

    The whole time with sub par players who don't receive frees and then some like Matt Jones who will see a person already tackled to the ground and fall on their back or head, it's not that difficult to believe.

  • Quote

    Without the draft and priority picks, Hawthorn wouldn't be where they are now.

    I really hate these threads, there seems to be about a dozen of them floating around here all written by people who don't understand the system at all.

  • Quote

    We are despised in AFL circles.

    They are biased and need a good reeming.

  • Quote

    Yep they do get the rub of the green at home. But.

    Over that ten year period they have been premiers and runners up so have been at the pointy end of the ladder and usually those teams do get more frees.

    Factor in they had Judd and he got lots of frees due to every one trying to stop him, also cousins and Kerr. And then they had their duckers, especially Hams and Selwood raising his arm.

    To compare to us who have been at the bottom

    The whole time with sub par players who don't receive frees and then some like Matt Jones who will see a person already tackled to the ground and fall on their back or head, it's not that difficult to believe.

    The stats don't back that up.; If you look at a ladder of frees for and against it is very different from the ladder of wins/losses every year.

    Biffo is right the umps and the AFL need a good reeming.

  • Quote

    Interesting to see stats for other interstate clubs.

    Hawthorn and North in Tassie.

    I reckon Sydney get an AFL sanctioned dream run in overall terms.

    96 GF - Dunkley

    O3 ~ Barry Hall in Prelim

    Academy

    COLA

    Jettas running goal against Pies in Prelim.

    Sydney must have ongoing success for marketing and TV rights.

    Anyway, like whinging cos you're not born into the Packer family. Get our own FD in order first.

  • Quote
    • Author

    The stats don't back that up.; If you look at a ladder of frees for and against it is very different from the ladder of wins/losses every year.

    Biffo is right the umps and the AFL need a good reeming.

    Thought I would compile a free kick ladder(2006-2015) for everyone to see. A couple of surprises and non surprises here.

    FREE KICK LADDER

    1. West Coast Eagles 4768 frees for 4016 against- Difference +752

    2. North Melbourne 4482-4136 +346

    3. Carlton 4190-3968 +222

    4. Geelong 4756-4603 +153

    5, Port Adelaide 4445-4323 +122

    6. Richmond 3913-3861 +52

    7. Collingwood 4150-4112 +38

    8. Western Bulldogs 4181-4175 +6

    9. Adelaide 4104-4146 -42

    10. GWS* 1618-1666 -48

    11. Essendon 4046-4100 -54

    12. Gold Coast* 1901-1972 -71

    13. MELBOURNE 4071-4186 -115

    14. St Kilda 4236-4406 -170

    15. Brisbane 4094-4279 -185

    16. FREMANTLE 4249-4449 - 200

    17. HAWTHORN 4527-4848 -321

    18. SYDNEY 4464-4795 -331

    * Smaller sample taken

    Looks like Sydney, Hawthorn and Fremantle can still dominate without the umpires help. We cannot say the same about the Eagles though can we?

  • Quote
    • Author

    I agree entirely with your point, but I worry about your math skills.

    4768 - 3584 = 1184

    3701 - 4186 = -485

    Thus WC have a comparative advantage of 1669 free kicks over us over your ten year sample.

    The figure of 3701 should have read 4071. Sorry.

  • Quote

    That is interesting. Need a data analysis more skilled than me to interpret. I suspect North 2nd to Swans 18th over a decade comprising 22 games a season represents a normal distribution curve.

    As you said in opening post - WC are off the chart.

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 489 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Haha
      • 179 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Like
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All