Jump to content

Featured Replies

17 minutes ago, poita said:

We haven't won a final in consecutive years since 1990/91 - that would be a nice one to tick off this year.

Aside from Gold Coast who haven't even played in a final yet, we hold the longest drought in terms of not winning a final in consecutive years.

Next I think is Carlton - 2000/2001.

 
On 4/16/2015 at 9:32 AM, praha said:

Win a final outside of Victoria

- Last win: Never (2 games, 2 losses)

I'm not sure if we can cross this one off the list.

Technically we were the home team in all our final wins so we essentially had equal if not more of the crowd support in all three finals.

I consider this drought still active until we win a final outside of VIC as the genuine away team.

None of these records embarrass me anymore, win flags and the rest is irrelevant. 

Well maybe the 190/186 point losses if we can eradicate that I'd be happy.

 
1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

None of these records embarrass me anymore, win flags and the rest is irrelevant. 

Well maybe the 190/186 point losses if we can eradicate that I'd be happy.

Eradicating the record 190 point loss can be done in one of two ways. Either somebody else loses by 191 points to another team or they lose to us by that amount. I'd take either, as it gets us out of the record books. However, I wouldn't object if we were the team inflicting the pain for a change.

5 hours ago, Deepfreeze said:

Haven't been able to buy a Chico Roll at a Melbourne game since about 1979.

 

I was really upset when For’N Twenty discontinued their fantastic Cornish pasties. Always had one or two at a game. Disappeared about two decades ago I believe.

Edited by John Crow Batty


5 hours ago, Biffen said:

They've been banned by the EPA.

 

What is wrong with the concept of fat encased in fat?

Wowsers!

5 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Do Chico rolls still exist? Or have they gone the way of other fine delicacies like the Polly Waffle?

Available n Coles, but I don't want to cook them.

Just buy and devour........ at the footy.

6970032.jpg

Edited by Deepfreeze

We need to win 4 in a row…. (At least..)

So that Tiger, Whorethorn and Jeelong persons can be silenced and told to “Sit Down”

 
41 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

We need to win 4 in a row…. (At least..)

So that Tiger, Whorethorn and Jeelong persons can be silenced and told to “Sit Down”

And so that we get back to the top of the ‘number of premierships’ list, where we belong!

44 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So that Tiger, Whorethorn and Jeelong persons can be silenced and told to “Sit Down”

… and Essendon persons. Don’t forget Essendon persons! 😁


1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

… and Essendon persons. Don’t forget Essendon persons! 😁

I tell them to “Sit Down” now

(How many days is it?)

40 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I tell them to “Sit Down” now

(How many days is it?)

Clearly they’re not listening to you. Not the ones around my neck of the woods, anyways. 😉

On 1/27/2022 at 12:22 PM, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Not beating North Melbourne at least once at Marvel in the stadium's 21 year existence not raise your eyebrow?

We haven't played North Melbourne at Marvel since 2014. Not like we've had the opportunity lately.

And we've only played them there 8 times in total, six of them over a period of 5 years when we were hopeless (2009-2014).

We've just won a premiership. All those other piddly records are history and meaningless.

On 1/27/2022 at 1:03 PM, Grapeviney said:

You've obviously never been teased by a Sydney supporter over the fact that we haven't beaten them on a Sunday at the MCG since 2001.

My non-MFC  mates rib me about that one all the time, and they're not going to stop regardless of how many flags we win. 

And Sydney haven't beaten us at the SCG since 2016. 😉

On 4/16/2015 at 9:44 AM, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Slightly different, but still waiting for a Melbourne player to kick 100 goals in a season.

Maybe it will be Bbb. Tough effort to do in today's game though. 


5 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Maybe it will be Bbb. Tough effort to do in today's game though. 

We never try to individualise in our forward  line !! So no 100 goal kicker. 

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Unless they all kick 100 goals!

quite possible given we will kick 400+ goals over 25 games :)

19 hours ago, daisycutter said:

quite possible given we will kick 400+ goals over 25 games :)

Has there ever been a team with two players kicking 100 goals each in the same season? If so, I can't recall. I do remember when more than one player in different teams kicked 100 goals in a season. It's hard to believe now, but when we had full forwards like Hudson, Wade, McKenna and Jesaulenko (who wasn't always a full forward) and significantly less defensive pressure, I think it happened a few times. 

24 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Has there ever been a team with two players kicking 100 goals each in the same season? If so, I can't recall. I do remember when more than one player in different teams kicked 100 goals in a season. It's hard to believe now, but when we had full forwards like Hudson, Wade, McKenna and Jesaulenko (who wasn't always a full forward) and significantly less defensive pressure, I think it happened a few times. 

Hawthorn had Hudson 105 in 1977 and Matthews was second on list with 91 for the season. 
 

Different footy those days - Tigers kicked 23 goals in GF  and lost

Edited by radar


2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Has there ever been a team with two players kicking 100 goals each in the same season? If so, I can't recall. I do remember when more than one player in different teams kicked 100 goals in a season. It's hard to believe now, but when we had full forwards like Hudson, Wade, McKenna and Jesaulenko (who wasn't always a full forward) and significantly less defensive pressure, I think it happened a few times. 

I do remember one year, Hudson, McKenna, Wade and Jesaulenko all kicked over the ton in a season 

3 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I do remember one year, Hudson, McKenna, Wade and Jesaulenko all kicked over the ton in a season 

Pretty sure there was a year when Ablett, Dunstall, Lockett and Modra all cracked the ton as well?

21 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Pretty sure there was a year when Ablett, Dunstall, Lockett and Modra all cracked the ton as well?

Yes that is quite possible 

early 90’s

 
46 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Yes that is quite possible 

early 90’s

ok, here we go (since 1968)

3 x 100 goal kickers: 

  • 1970 Hudson McKenna Jesaulenko
  • 1993 Modra Ablett Dunstal

2 x 100 goal Kickers:

  • 1969 Hudson Wade
  • 1971 Hudson McKenna
  • 1972 McKenna Blethyn
  • 1987 Lockett Capper
  • 1991 Lockett Sumich
  • 1992 Lockett Dunstal
  • 1994 Dunstall Ablett 
  • 1995 Lockett Ablett
  • 1996 Lockett Dunstall

as you can see there were 2 golden periods 1991 to 1996 (shown in green) and 1969 to 1972 (shown inred)

 

1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

ok, here we go (since 1968)

3 x 100 goal kickers: 

  • 1970 Hudson McKenna Jesaulenko
  • 1993 Modra Ablett Dunstal

2 x 100 goal Kickers:

  • 1969 Hudson Wade
  • 1971 Hudson McKenna
  • 1972 McKenna Blethyn
  • 1987 Lockett Capper
  • 1991 Lockett Sumich
  • 1992 Lockett Dunstal
  • 1994 Dunstall Ablett 
  • 1995 Lockett Ablett
  • 1996 Lockett Dunstall

as you can see there were 2 golden periods 1991 to 1996 (shown in green) and 1969 to 1972 (shown inred)

 

Quite ridiculous that 3(!!) players cracked the ton in 93 considering there were only 20 H&A games per team (2 byes each) - the same for 1969 as well.

In fact some of the earlier goalkickers like Coventry, Pratt etc would have been during an 18 game H&A season, Pratt kicking 150!

Edited by Dr. Gonzo


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 115 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies