MFC website rant.

[beelzebub 23,313]

maybe some havent twigged.. all those images are designed to key into the New Melbourne is Melbourne campaign.

good to see so many on the ball

[Gipsy Danger 1,067]

Holy crap who cares!

[dazzledavey36 54,285]

I'm pretty sure Peter K would gladly throw his hand up, plus his photos are always great!

Please don't.

[AzzKikA 2,371]

Still have no idea what you are ranting about, as in the pics posted there is no collage.

[praha 11,236]

What makes me laugh is that after a loss, the club and website basically go into lockdown.

On Saturday for example, all the facebook feed could manage is a link to the "play by play" page on the official site.

In fact, the club didn't even mention that the team lost.

First there was this post: https://www.facebook.com/MELBOURNEfc/photos/a.414317157316.209227.285839797316/10153297419662317/?type=1

And then this one, a prompt 60 minutes after the loss: https://www.facebook.com/MELBOURNEfc/posts/10153297646372317

I get that it's "damage control", but it's a pretty poor effort in terms of informing your fans how the team is travelling.

Compare this to Brisbane's page, which actually keeps the fan engaged and informed throughout the match. The lost by 80 points: https://www.facebook.com/BrisbaneLions?fref=ts

And Carlton: https://www.facebook.com/OfficialCarltonFC?fref=ts

Edited April 12, 2015 by praha

[Ethan Tremblay 30,826]

What makes me laugh is that after a loss, the club and website basically go into lockdown.

On Saturday for example, all the facebook feed could manage is a link to the "play by play" page on the official site.

In fact, the club didn't even mention that the team lost.

First there was this post: https://www.facebook.com/MELBOURNEfc/photos/a.414317157316.209227.285839797316/10153297419662317/?type=1

And then this one, a prompt 60 minutes after the loss: https://www.facebook.com/MELBOURNEfc/posts/10153297646372317

I get that it's "damage control", but it's a pretty poor effort in terms of informing your fans how the team is travelling.

Compare this to Brisbane's page, which actually keeps the fan engaged and informed throughout the match. The lost by 80 points: https://www.facebook.com/BrisbaneLions?fref=ts

And Carlton: https://www.facebook.com/OfficialCarltonFC?fref=ts

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-12/round-two-the-demon-within

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-12/we-capitulated-after-halftime-roos

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-12/five-talking-points-gws-v-melbourne

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-11/gws-momentum-smashed-us-viney

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-11/we-dont-have-the-talent-says-roos

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-11/we-lacked-effort-mcdonald

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-11/quarter-by-quarter-gws-v-dees

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-04-11/giants-turn-heat-on-melbourne

All on the MFC home page. Where are you looking Praha? The game was also live tweeted and facebook updated from their homepage.

Edited April 13, 2015 by Ethan Tremblay

[beelzebub 23,313]

someone ought to tell the club its actually 2015 !! Under the 'Club tab.. / Sponsorship

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/the-club/sponsorship/2014-sponsors

petty i know....just in that kinda mood after the weekend !!

[dazzledavey36 54,285]

Anyone notice the player pics haven't been updated yet and we are already into round 3.

Demonland already had these newly updated ones way back in early March..

[beelzebub 23,313]

Anyone notice the player pics haven't been updated yet and we are already into round 3.

Demonland already had these newly updated ones way back in early March..

pretty pizz poor really

[praha 11,236]

My number one pet hate about the site's coverage is when they do the "Past record doesn't matter" article.

I've seen it about 5 times this year. Obviously Burgs is asking the question, "What does the playing group make of its recent poor record against this week's opposition?" And the answer is always the same: "We don't talk about it."

Most recent: http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-07-16/past-record-no-relevance-mcpherson

[Je Roos Salem 661]

This is the quality content I've been after: http://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/2015-07-17/unwanted-visitor

[Bluey's Dad 3,419]

My number one pet hate about the site's coverage is when they do the "Past record doesn't matter" article.

I've seen it about 5 times this year. Obviously Burgs is asking the question, "What does the playing group make of its recent poor record against this week's opposition?" And the answer is always the same: "We don't talk about it."

Most recent: http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2015-07-16/past-record-no-relevance-mcpherson

Ah Ha! BURGS is the spectre!

We've been looking in the wrong place! It's not the players, we should get rid of Burgs! He keeps reminding the players, publicly, about how [censored] they are.

Get on it Roos.

[whatwhat say what 22,700]

first godwin now an unwanted visitor at a training 'sesion'.

video is cool tho!

[SaberFang 7,151]

We really are a long way behind most other clubs in the media stakes. I think the only player we had a debut reaction video for was vandenBerg.

[Good Times Grimes 2,396]

We really are a long way behind most other clubs in the media stakes. I think the only player we had a debut reaction video for was vandenBerg.

There was one for Harmes last week

[Yossarian 1,820]

We really are a long way behind most other clubs in the media stakes.

No, we aren't.

[SaberFang 7,151]

Have you actually looked at the content offered by other clubs?

[The Song Formerly Known As 6,479]

We really are a long way behind most other clubs in the media stakes. I think the only player we had a debut reaction video for was vandenBerg.

We really aren't. Many of my mates who barracks for various opposition clubs say how much onto it our media team is compared to theirs.

[BAMF 4,300]

first godwin now an unwanted visitor at a training 'sesion'.

video is cool tho!

Is it bad that my first thought when I saw this headline was that the unwanted visitor was Saty?