Jump to content

Featured Replies

The Footscray Bulldogs won the VFL last year with the following ex-AFL players on their VFL list:

but what has it got them ??

 

Casey will have quite a number of Melbourne players to utilise. Casey is ( now ) a development participant in the greater Melbourne cause.

and thats all it should be ...yes I know Im one eyed Melbourne !!

Casey will have quite a number of Melbourne players to utilise. Casey is ( now ) a development participant in the greater Melbourne cause.

and thats all it should be ...yes I know Im one eyed Melbourne !!

Go on I would never have guessed it!
 

I've always maintained that you need your aligned club to have its own playing group with sufficient strength to provide the right environment to enable the development of your own playing group and to also be successful in its own right. Casey failed in that regard for a number of reasons which led to its on field demise this year. Now that the drafts are over and a number of available players who missed out can be identified, it's up to the Scorpions to work hard on their recruiting and pick up at least 2 or 3 match toughened players with harder bodies that they lacked this year and the Demons have a responsibility to help them.

I would also like to see Casey gain a bigger following in its own region. Some of the crowds at games I attended this year were abysmal which I suppose reflects on the standard of its football and also, the fact that it still hasn't been embraced by the local Cranbourne community since its move from Springvale a decade ago.

I've always maintained that you need your aligned club to have its own playing group with sufficient strength to provide the right environment to enable the development of your own playing group and to also be successful in its own right. Casey failed in that regard for a number of reasons which led to its on field demise this year. Now that the drafts are over and a number of available players who missed out can be identified, it's up to the Scorpions to work hard on their recruiting and pick up at least 2 or 3 match toughened players with harder bodies that they lacked this year and the Demons have a responsibility to help them.

I would also like to see Casey gain a bigger following in its own region. Some of the crowds at games I attended this year were abysmal which I suppose reflects on the standard of its football and also, the fact that it still hasn't been embraced by the local Cranbourne community since its move from Springvale a decade ago.

Spot on 'Jack', this is a must. Byrnes is a start but we need one or two more.


but what has it got them ??

Great VFL crowds. A renewed passion for the club in the region and a development model that seems to be working for the likes of Macrae, Stringer, Bontempelli etc.

Now they obviously had some other issues that we know about but that doesn't mean their VFL wasn't a success.

Think for the alignment to work its, imperative for local community to buy in. How you make that happen I'm not sure exactly, but getting the best local players and extensive marketing and benefits to the locals cant hurt.

One of the major issues for me is that the Casey ground is such a poor viewing ground. It's large, with a large camber and you can't really get high enough to see much.

And if there is the slightest breeze it turns into a tornado at Cranbourne. All in all it's probably the least inviting ground in the VFL to watch footy from.

Hence small crowds, even for the locals who don't have to spend 50 minutes in the car to get there.

 

he has a personality all of his own,with quite an off beat flying pattern.

Seems to have gone quiet lately though.

Surely you didn't pick a fight with poor old Reginald did you Biff?

"Least inviting ground in the VFL to watch footy from". That's a big call BB.

Have you ever played or watched a game at Willy on a windy cold winters day? Werribee or Frankston perhaps?

Cannot agree at all. Sandringham is not even terraced and has minimal coverage for patrons.

All in the eye of the beholder I suppose, but one things for sure, Casey is in a fast growing corridor with many young families. I would have thought there was a reasonable prospect of building a decent enterprise around this.


  • Author

Shannon Byrnes is an ex AFL player...

Wow thats 1...

Wow thats 1...

A journey of a thousand Kilometres starts with a single step!

"Least inviting ground in the VFL to watch footy from". That's a big call BB.

Have you ever played or watched a game at Willy on a windy cold winters day? Werribee or Frankston perhaps?

Cannot agree at all. Sandringham is not even terraced and has minimal coverage for patrons.

All in the eye of the beholder I suppose, but one things for sure, Casey is in a fast growing corridor with many young families. I would have thought there was a reasonable prospect of building a decent enterprise around this.

We've been there for a while now 'Dockett' and it's looking more doubtful by the year particularly with Casey being close to broke.

"Least inviting ground in the VFL to watch footy from". That's a big call BB.

Have you ever played or watched a game at Willy on a windy cold winters day? Werribee or Frankston perhaps?

Cannot agree at all. Sandringham is not even terraced and has minimal coverage for patrons.

All in the eye of the beholder I suppose, but one things for sure, Casey is in a fast growing corridor with many young families. I would have thought there was a reasonable prospect of building a decent enterprise around this.

I've been to Willy on a cold winters day. But you can sit in the stand and get a reasonable view. There is a little stand at Werribee you can sit in and that gives you a reasonable view. Frankston is not flash but on the outer side up on the hill it's ok. And it's got lots of character over there.

Sandy was good because the ground was so small. Not good for footy development but good for viewing. I don't know the dimensions of the grounds but Casey does seem big and has big boundary's as well which just compounds the problem, it's not sheltered at all by terrain (not any hills around) and the trees are so far from the ground that they provide no protection so the wind impacts significantly.

I've seen a lot of games at Casey and just couldn't find a good vantage point. I go to all the grounds you mention plus Coburg, OO and Port because I get to see a bit. IMO Casey is the worst. But I haven't viewed from the social club - that might be ok.

I've been to Willy on a cold winters day. But you can sit in the stand and get a reasonable view. There is a little stand at Werribee you can sit in and that gives you a reasonable view. Frankston is not flash but on the outer side up on the hill it's ok. And it's got lots of character over there.

Sandy was good because the ground was so small. Not good for footy development but good for viewing. I don't know the dimensions of the grounds but Casey does seem big and has big boundary's as well which just compounds the problem, it's not sheltered at all by terrain (not any hills around) and the trees are so far from the ground that they provide no protection so the wind impacts significantly.

I've seen a lot of games at Casey and just couldn't find a good vantage point. I go to all the grounds you mention plus Coburg, OO and Port because I get to see a bit. IMO Casey is the worst. But I haven't viewed from the social club - that might be ok.

Viewing from the social club is alright Bob......Beer in hand and a smoke on the patio outside........You need something to take your mind off the dismal conditions and the way Casey played this year. The wind is always blowing a gale there it seams....


One of the major issues for me is that the Casey ground is such a poor viewing ground. It's large, with a large camber and you can't really get high enough to see much.

And if there is the slightest breeze it turns into a tornado at Cranbourne. All in all it's probably the least inviting ground in the VFL to watch footy from.

Hence small crowds, even for the locals who don't have to spend 50 minutes in the car to get there.

The point you make about the conditions and amenities at Casey Fields is well known and documented but these things apply in the case of many outer suburban venues and yet the clubs that use them (often at much lower levels) can still attract good crowds for local matches.

I think the problems at Casey go much further. The Scorpions are a local club that was uprooted a decade ago from Springvale where they had a ground that had become unsuited to VFL competition and in addition was situated in an area that had undergone substantial demographic change and therefore had a declining supporter base for our footy. For some reason, the local community at Cranbourne hasn't totally embraced the club.

I hope I'm not stepping on any toes or upsetting anybody's sensibilities because I'm not a local but my casual observation of the situation is that perhaps the identification with "Casey" rather than "Cranbourne" is one of the problems.

The City of Casey was formed during the Kennett years and is an amalgam of the old Cranbourne and Berwick municipalities. The two areas are cheese and chalk in many respects and Casey is still more resonant of the northern part of the municipality which is where the name came from in the first place. I get the feeling therefore that the Cranbourne locals aren't fully enamoured with the Casey identity yet - the municipal offices are at Fountain Gate where the old Berwick Shire offices are situated while the old Cranbourne Shire offices were closed years ago and are now used for other purposes. So there's a possible disconnect between the folk at Cranbourne and the concept of Casey where the power base seems to be elsewhere.

In addition, there's the Cranbourne Football Club which is a strong club with lots of depth and tradition and a base going all the way down to the junior ranks which therefore gives it an enormous foothold in the local community and from which the Casey Scorpions stand apart.

I would like to hear from the locals but my theory is that for a football club to work in this area, it needs to have a heart and soul. A closer connection to the local name and the local football club might do the trick. Perhaps some sort of alignment between the two that sees the club become the Cranbourne Demons at VFL senior and development team level and to retain the Cranbourne Eagles identity at local and junior levels.

I realise this is probably a highly sensitive area. On the one hand, it would be breaking tradition with the old Springvale but from what I see, much of that has been lost and the club isn't attracting supporters or dollars from that part of the world and without those things, it will never flourish. By ditching the Casey name, it might also get some noses out of joint from the northern part of the municipality while traditionalists from the local Cranbourne club and those associated with other clubs in the area might not be comfortable either.

I've put it out there as an idea and as a possible alternative to abandoning the idea of an alignment and doing what a number of other clubs are doing and going alone - possibly to Prahran or to Punt Road to share with Richmond.

The point you make about the conditions and amenities at Casey Fields is well known and documented but these things apply in the case of many outer suburban venues and yet the clubs that use them (often at much lower levels) can still attract good crowds for local matches.

I think the problems at Casey go much further. The Scorpions are a local club that was uprooted a decade ago from Springvale where they had a ground that had become unsuited to VFL competition and in addition was situated in an area that had undergone substantial demographic change and therefore had a declining supporter base for our footy. For some reason, the local community at Cranbourne hasn't totally embraced the club.

I hope I'm not stepping on any toes or upsetting anybody's sensibilities because I'm not a local but my casual observation of the situation is that perhaps the identification with "Casey" rather than "Cranbourne" is one of the problems.

The City of Casey was formed during the Kennett years and is an amalgam of the old Cranbourne and Berwick municipalities. The two areas are cheese and chalk in many respects and Casey is still more resonant of the northern part of the municipality which is where the name came from in the first place. I get the feeling therefore that the Cranbourne locals aren't fully enamoured with the Casey identity yet - the municipal offices are at Fountain Gate where the old Berwick Shire offices are situated while the old Cranbourne Shire offices were closed years ago and are now used for other purposes. So there's a possible disconnect between the folk at Cranbourne and the concept of Casey where the power base seems to be elsewhere.

In addition, there's the Cranbourne Football Club which is a strong club with lots of depth and tradition and a base going all the way down to the junior ranks which therefore gives it an enormous foothold in the local community and from which the Casey Scorpions stand apart.

I would like to hear from the locals but my theory is that for a football club to work in this area, it needs to have a heart and soul. A closer connection to the local name and the local football club might do the trick. Perhaps some sort of alignment between the two that sees the club become the Cranbourne Demons at VFL senior and development team level and to retain the Cranbourne Eagles identity at local and junior levels.

I realise this is probably a highly sensitive area. On the one hand, it would be breaking tradition with the old Springvale but from what I see, much of that has been lost and the club isn't attracting supporters or dollars from that part of the world and without those things, it will never flourish. By ditching the Casey name, it might also get some noses out of joint from the northern part of the municipality while traditionalists from the local Cranbourne club and those associated with other clubs in the area might not be comfortable either.

I've put it out there as an idea and as a possible alternative to abandoning the idea of an alignment and doing what a number of other clubs are doing and going alone - possibly to Prahran or to Punt Road to share with Richmond.

I would personally love it if we played at Prahran. I would go to most of the home games there.

The point you make about the conditions and amenities at Casey Fields is well known and documented but these things apply in the case of many outer suburban venues and yet the clubs that use them (often at much lower levels) can still attract good crowds for local matches.

I think the problems at Casey go much further. The Scorpions are a local club that was uprooted a decade ago from Springvale where they had a ground that had become unsuited to VFL competition and in addition was situated in an area that had undergone substantial demographic change and therefore had a declining supporter base for our footy. For some reason, the local community at Cranbourne hasn't totally embraced the club.

I hope I'm not stepping on any toes or upsetting anybody's sensibilities because I'm not a local but my casual observation of the situation is that perhaps the identification with "Casey" rather than "Cranbourne" is one of the problems.

The City of Casey was formed during the Kennett years and is an amalgam of the old Cranbourne and Berwick municipalities. The two areas are cheese and chalk in many respects and Casey is still more resonant of the northern part of the municipality which is where the name came from in the first place. I get the feeling therefore that the Cranbourne locals aren't fully enamoured with the Casey identity yet - the municipal offices are at Fountain Gate where the old Berwick Shire offices are situated while the old Cranbourne Shire offices were closed years ago and are now used for other purposes. So there's a possible disconnect between the folk at Cranbourne and the concept of Casey where the power base seems to be elsewhere.

In addition, there's the Cranbourne Football Club which is a strong club with lots of depth and tradition and a base going all the way down to the junior ranks which therefore gives it an enormous foothold in the local community and from which the Casey Scorpions stand apart.

I would like to hear from the locals but my theory is that for a football club to work in this area, it needs to have a heart and soul. A closer connection to the local name and the local football club might do the trick. Perhaps some sort of alignment between the two that sees the club become the Cranbourne Demons at VFL senior and development team level and to retain the Cranbourne Eagles identity at local and junior levels.

I realise this is probably a highly sensitive area. On the one hand, it would be breaking tradition with the old Springvale but from what I see, much of that has been lost and the club isn't attracting supporters or dollars from that part of the world and without those things, it will never flourish. By ditching the Casey name, it might also get some noses out of joint from the northern part of the municipality while traditionalists from the local Cranbourne club and those associated with other clubs in the area might not be comfortable either.

I've put it out there as an idea and as a possible alternative to abandoning the idea of an alignment and doing what a number of other clubs are doing and going alone - possibly to Prahran or to Punt Road to share with Richmond.

I agree Casey is a soulless place. And you're dead right in that when Springvale went to Casey there was naturally little if any local support and it would seem not much support has transferred from Springvale. Competing with a strong local club is an issue but many people support both local and AFL footy.

Chris Connolly was the main facilitator for Casey and he worked very hard to establish links with that community. I don't know what is being done now. But reality is you're selling a concept and when the concept is to go to a soulless ground where you can't see much and the footy is often poor because of the windswept site you're making your job much harder than it should be.

Prahran would be great Redleg and I'd like to see us comsider the Richmond Footy Ground. I don't know if the MFC has any information and I was all for giving Cranbourne a go but perhaps it's time to reassess the idea of playing at Casey. Pity we have a 20 year lease. That seems madness in retrospect.

Sorry Jack but that is a bad idea. Changing the name to cranbourne or associating with only cranbourne will cause them to lose following from other areas. There are many strong junior & senior clubs in the area including narre warren, berwick, hallam, hampton park, endeavour hills, lynbrook etc etc. The problem is that all areas associate with their own local teams & not so much with Casey. Perhaps the scorpions need to have a bigger presence at the local clubs & start using these local clubs as a feeder system. I don't think there is a problem with the overall structure but more the way they interact with the local community.

Another issue is that springvale folded & became casey. Casey is not the local football team. As you know before that we had the dandenong redlegs who folded. I think you will find most locals would identify more with the redlegs than casey or springvale. Perhaps they should rebrand themselves as the redlegs or merge with the dandenong stingrays as this is where all the local talent ends up playing their junior footy. There is a disconnect between junior footy & casey. I think aligning themselves with the stingrays would be a good idea & create a closer bond with junior footy.

I would personally love it if we played at Prahran. I would go to most of the home games there.

I would personally love it if we moved to Punt Road and took over the Richmond Ground. After all, the Punt Road Oval is in the City of Melbourne [and was never in Richmond]. Why don't we do a take-over and let them relocate to the Kevin Bartlett Oval [in Richmond]? That seems a good deal to me, especially as we let them play their Senior (AFL) games at the MCG, our traditional home ground ever since we started life as the Melbourne Cricket Club Football Club (MCCFC)


Sorry Jack but that is a bad idea. Changing the name to cranbourne or associating with only cranbourne will cause them to ...........

G'day Bonkers. What's your thoughts on dispensing with the Scorpions name. If little of Springvale remains, would rebranding as Casey Demons make a statement that we are Casey, not Springvale and we are here for the long haul ?

Agree on the problems competing with local clubs. Wondering if an initiative like incorporating a lightning premiership as part of the locals pre-season practice match schedule could be an idea. The Casey Cup with a few grand to the winning club.

You could do something similar at junior level. Also have a program where junior teams are invited to train alongside Casey. And yes - embrace the Dandy & Gippy TAC teams.There are plenty of ways to foster the relationships but it needs co-ordination & passion

Chris Connolly was a huge loss to the alignment

And BB's right. A fast-growing forest needs to be planted aroung the outside of the ground ASAP. There is no protection from the wind apart from the grandstand

G'day Bonkers. What's your thoughts on dispensing with the Scorpions name. If little of Springvale remains, would rebranding as Casey Demons make a statement that we are Casey, not Springvale and we are here for the long haul ?

Agree on the problems competing with local clubs. Wondering if an initiative like incorporating a lightning premiership as part of the locals pre-season practice match schedule could be an idea. The Casey Cup with a few grand to the winning club.

You could do something similar at junior level. Also have a program where junior teams are invited to train alongside Casey. And yes - embrace the Dandy & Gippy TAC teams.There are plenty of ways to foster the relationships but it needs co-ordination & passion

Chris Connolly was a huge loss to the alignment

And BB's right. A fast-growing forest needs to be planted aroung the outside of the ground ASAP. There is no protection from the wind apart from the grandstand

How are ya GTB? Well the Scorpions name was from the previous Springvale football club. In my opinion they should do whatever it takes to make it work in the area. If that means a re-branding to Casey Demons so be it. However I don't think the naming is the real issue.

Local competitions would be a good idea. I know that when I was a junior we had similar lightning premiership Under 9's but it was through the DDJFL (Dandenong Districts Junior Football League). Casey could endeavour to do the same on the grounds they have available at Casey Fields if available.

I think a large issue is that Casey is standing alone & apart from the junior clubs. Once a youth prospect gets to around 18 they would be just as likely to leave their junior club & to try out with say Box Hill, Frankston or Sandringham as they would with Casey. I think they should pay some close attention to this & make it evident that there is a pathway to develop through playing at Casey & that they have just as good prospects there than anywhere else. Perhaps this is something both Casey & Melbourne could put some money into.

An important thing to remember is there are so many kids in the area. I know through a friend that takes their kid to Auskick that they didn't bother taking their kid to Casey fields for Auskick as there was something like 400 kids participating & it was too over crowded. Too many kids participate & it effected how their own child participated in Auskick. They had to take their child to Narre Warren where there were less numbers. There are another 3 Auskick clinics in Cranbourne so I guess you can get an idea of the growth in the area & why it is in my opinion really important for Casey & the MFC to work on this relationship. We have a small supporter base in numbers & we will only improve this by doing similar to what Hawthorn did in the 80's - 90's. They built relationships in the Sth East & focused in on the growth areas & winning flags helped a lot of course.

I think for the alignment to work, Casey & MFC need to be likeable. I know that sounds simplistic but that is the reality of it. The club has been spending a lot of time in the local schools, perhaps they need to start looking at doing the same at the local footy clubs. They have to continue building relationships with all stakeholders, actively participate in the community, schools, local footy & start to play some football that people want to watch.

When I first went to Casey fields 5 years ago there were no houses around it. It seemed even further out than could be imagined. It was Cranbourne plus some. It's now surrounded by houses. That has to be one positive.

Yet it still is a stadium all by itself that requires driving to. You'd never accidentally just lob at Casey fields for a Scorps game unless you lived in one of the houses next door. Even the ground itself is set back across the train line from the main road.

How Casey offer a product that is popular with locals besides from just players friends and families and how MFC fans get involved might take 2 different initiatives. Good attractive footy is definitely a start.

I don't think you can undersell just how much improvement could come if you managed to shield some of the wind. Windy footy is just crap to watch.

The suggestion to build small forests around the ground (or particularly at either end as the grandstands do shield the wings a bit) can not be taken lightly. I'd drop in a giant concrete wall at either end and paint a scorpion on one end and a demon on the other.

Edit: In fact it would probably be smarter to just invest in a few (or few dozen) of these bad boys

http://www.networld-sports.co.uk/tennis-sports-equipment/tennis-windbreaks/tennis-windbreak-screens.html

 

The point you make about the conditions and amenities at Casey Fields is well known and documented but these things apply in the case of many outer suburban venues and yet the clubs that use them (often at much lower levels) can still attract good crowds for local matches.

I think the problems at Casey go much further. The Scorpions are a local club that was uprooted a decade ago from Springvale where they had a ground that had become unsuited to VFL competition and in addition was situated in an area that had undergone substantial demographic change and therefore had a declining supporter base for our footy. For some reason, the local community at Cranbourne hasn't totally embraced the club.

I hope I'm not stepping on any toes or upsetting anybody's sensibilities because I'm not a local but my casual observation of the situation is that perhaps the identification with "Casey" rather than "Cranbourne" is one of the problems.

The City of Casey was formed during the Kennett years and is an amalgam of the old Cranbourne and Berwick municipalities. The two areas are cheese and chalk in many respects and Casey is still more resonant of the northern part of the municipality which is where the name came from in the first place. I get the feeling therefore that the Cranbourne locals aren't fully enamoured with the Casey identity yet - the municipal offices are at Fountain Gate where the old Berwick Shire offices are situated while the old Cranbourne Shire offices were closed years ago and are now used for other purposes. So there's a possible disconnect between the folk at Cranbourne and the concept of Casey where the power base seems to be elsewhere.

In addition, there's the Cranbourne Football Club which is a strong club with lots of depth and tradition and a base going all the way down to the junior ranks which therefore gives it an enormous foothold in the local community and from which the Casey Scorpions stand apart.

I would like to hear from the locals but my theory is that for a football club to work in this area, it needs to have a heart and soul. A closer connection to the local name and the local football club might do the trick. Perhaps some sort of alignment between the two that sees the club become the Cranbourne Demons at VFL senior and development team level and to retain the Cranbourne Eagles identity at local and junior levels.

I realise this is probably a highly sensitive area. On the one hand, it would be breaking tradition with the old Springvale but from what I see, much of that has been lost and the club isn't attracting supporters or dollars from that part of the world and without those things, it will never flourish. By ditching the Casey name, it might also get some noses out of joint from the northern part of the municipality while traditionalists from the local Cranbourne club and those associated with other clubs in the area might not be comfortable either.

I've put it out there as an idea and as a possible alternative to abandoning the idea of an alignment and doing what a number of other clubs are doing and going alone - possibly to Prahran or to Punt Road to share with Richmond.

I would personally love it if we moved to Punt Road and took over the Richmond Ground. After all, the Punt Road Oval is in the City of Melbourne [and was never in Richmond]. Why don't we do a take-over and let them relocate to the Kevin Bartlett Oval [in Richmond]? That seems a good deal to me, especially as we let them play their Senior (AFL) games at the MCG, our traditional home ground ever since we started life as the Melbourne Cricket Club Football Club (MCCFC)

I know we made a profit in 2014, but I've said it before in other threads about the possibility of Melbourne playing their VFL team out at Punt Rd,

I don't know where we're going to find the money to pay Richmond to let us use their ground let alone take over Punt Rd!

WJ's suggestion about Prahran would be a little more realistic, or Victoria Park, seeing as it's not owned by Collingwood anymore. But personally I'm now living in one of the houses right next to Casey Fields, a 5 min walk from the ground. So I hope the Dees stay here for the next 20 years plus!

How are ya GTB? Well the Scorpions name was from the previous Springvale football club. In my opinion they should do whatever it takes......

Thanks mate. Appreciate the response. Wouldn't mind hearing KC from Casy's views when he next drops in on the thread


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
    • 30 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 489 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 190 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland