Jump to content

Paul Roos signs for third year

Featured Replies

I believe he will pick a successor from within the current coaching group unless an outstanding candidate appears.

God i hope not

Would much rather hire an experienced coach than just choose one of our current assistants out of convenience

Jade Rawlings is not the successor

 

I believe he will pick a successor from within the current coaching group unless an outstanding candidate appears.

This is something I've wondered about. So much about a 'successor' from outside but surely given the somewhat handpicked ensemble cast of assistant as well as retaining Rawlings why would it not be reasonable to think the 'chosen one " comes from within.

If I was an assistant with aspirations Id be a little annoyed that some interloper just wafts in and takes charge..just saying

God i hope not

Would much rather hire an experienced coach than just choose one of our current assistants out of convenience

Jade Rawlings is not the successor

Jade Rawlings is very highly resepected. Youre talkiing shlt HH

 

Jade Rawlings is very highly resepected. Youre talkiing shlt HH

Show me where i said he wasnt highly respected?

If this were the case I'd expect the news to spread significantly faster than just to here.


God i hope not

Would much rather hire an experienced coach than just choose one of our current assistants out of convenience

Jade Rawlings is not the successor

lots of respect there HH... paint it any way you like but thats Dismissal with a capital D

If this were the case I'd expect the news to spread significantly faster than just to here.

I'm not saying it is the case, yet. But originally Roos wanted a number of candidates from whom the successor could be picked.

It makes sense that the successor is a person who Roos and the club think will best be able to do the job and who embodies what is needed in a coach.

Over the course of the last 12 months Roos may have come to think Rawlings could be that person. Not made a decision but may be considering him.

I would much rather our next coach be able to say:

He has 10 years AFL coaching experience

He has 3 years of mentoring from Roos

He has 3 years experience with training

the list and developing culture and game plan

He had the respect of the players souring the Neeld era

Than not have any of the above, or be a 2 year veteran.

If Roos thinks Rawlings is a good candidate, I'd much rather Rawlings than an inexperienced Hayes or Ling.

Would be wrapped if Roos took on a third and fourth, fifth etc etc et al!

Edited by picket fence

 

God i hope not

Would much rather hire an experienced coach than just choose one of our current assistants out of convenience

Jade Rawlings is not the successor

that is such an annoying post

the person you have responded to has pointed out some good REASONS WHY Rawlings MIGHT be the successor

you just dismiss with out even an attempt at explanation - tell us what you know personally about JR's coaching abilities please

I cna't see Roos leaving without pointing a successor which fits exactly what he wants.......

Would be very happy to hear Roosy has re-sgined though


What?

Are people seriously still in doubt that Roos will see out the 3 years?

I've always just assumed he'll do at least 3 years so don't pay much attention to the speculation - it's what happens beyond that that interests me.

I've always just assumed he'll do at least 3 years so don't pay much attention to the speculation - it's what happens beyond that that interests me.

Same.

What?

Are people seriously still in doubt that Roos will see out the 3 years?

I think this thread is less about whether or not he will sign, compared to whether or not he has signed, as this person supposedly said.

I think the necessity for an extra year will be determined on the successor. If the best candidate for the successor role is expirinced as an AFL coach (Ratten, Voss) Roos signing up for an extra year may limit our chances in getting that person (do they want a two year apprenticeship?). If the l club and roos think best candidate is someone without that experience, the third year is vital.

FWIW, I think having someone like Ratten oils be excellent. Coaching Melbourne is likely to be a tough gig for a while yet, so someone who has seen the ups and downs is good. Ratten shares a quality which Roos possesses, that being (seemingly) liked and respected by the players. On reflection he also appears to have done marvels with a list that may have been over rated by The Carlton board. He was an excellent player and did good things with MFC midfield as assistant. I think smart enough to learn the Roos gameplay and structures and to be able to implement them. In short, I would be very happy with Ratten as the successor over someone who has limited experience that we try to 'pull' into the role as part of the narrative of 'succession'.

I think this thread is less about whether or not he will sign, compared to whether or not he has signed, as this person supposedly said.

Fair enough.

But that's pretty much inconsequential then.


I got the same phone call last night......the caller said that it was great news that Roos had signed up for the third year

Was looking for the media to confirm but nothing so far.....

Sounds like an over-zealous phone canvasser trying to boost their numbers with a story.

If not released as yet by the club maybe they need to know there is someone spruking this info about to fund raise off the back of.


Does seem like a great way to sell more tickets, if it was honest!

I got the same phone call last night......the caller said that it was great news that Roos had signed up for the third year

Was looking for the media to confirm but nothing so far.....

surely you asked him what he was on about

surely you asked him what he was on about

No.....As I had not watched the news or any other media......I thought it had been announced

 

He is DEFINITELY not going past three years, (his words) but 24 months is a long time in footy....

As I recall it, he was DEFINITELY not coming to the MFC as well.

No.....As I had not watched the news or any other media......I thought it had been announced

oh and you hadn't seen this thread at that stage?

man if some [censored] is down at HQ saying this to folks on the phone he needs to be slapped back in line


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

      • Haha
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

    • 9 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Haha
    • 484 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Sad
    • 27 replies