wonder what we are giving for him.

thought he was delisted so we could get him in delisted free agency period

Rodan to Dees..Almost done:

www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/150234/default.aspx

What paper work? If he's delisted doesn't he need to be picked up in the PSD?

Anyway I'm not as down in the dumps about him as most people, will cost nothin', as long as he doesn't keep Blease out of the side I can live with it.

SMH is saying Gysberts for Pederson as well, god i hope not

http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/demon-gysberts-emerges-as-possible-solution-to-pederson-trade-20121025-287bm.html

Are we thinking:

Gysberts to Port

Jacobs to North

Pedersen & Pick 39 to Melbourne

Use Pick 39 on Ray???

Are we thinking:

Gysberts to Port

Jacobs to North

Pedersen & Pick 39 to Melbourne

Use Pick 39 on Ray???

Gysberts = Ray + Pederson? I'd do that deal.

For yet another rumor that I've heard today:

Gysberts to Essendon

Pears & Cripps (Saints) to West Coast

Brown & Pick 41 to St Kilda

Ray to Melbourne

would have gys over ray.

For yet another rumor that I've heard today:

Gysberts to Essendon

Pears & Cripps (Saints) to West Coast

Brown & Pick 41 to St Kilda

Ray to Melbourne

So in essence Gysberts for Ray?

Lol

whoever is pumping out these rumors must really hate the MFC

Edited October 25, 201213 yr by olisik

So in essence Gysberts for Ray?

Lol

whoever is pumping out these rumors must really hate the MFC

A failed pick 4 for a failed pick 11.

Upgrade!

A failed pick 4 for a failed pick 11.

Upgrade!

Gys hasn't failed yet, he had an injury riddled year and still did quite well in the VFL upon his return.

Are we thinking:

Gysberts to Port

Jacobs to North

Pedersen & Pick 39 to Melbourne

Use Pick 39 on Ray???

That is the reverse of the Martin deal and if you wanted to get rid of Gys you would do it. We get Ray and Pedersen for Gys.

Then we could trade Martin and 49 to Lions for 33 and keep 33.

I was thinking if Eagles want Morton can we try and get a straight swap for Ash Smith. Victorian boy might be happy to come home.

rumour melb is going for ben warren from north

Edited October 25, 201213 yr by red and blue forever

alos apparently we are talking to port about Jacobs

rumour melb is going for ben warren from north

Are we aiming to go below GWS and GC next year?

rumour melb is going for ben warren from north

If this rumour doesn't die soon, I just might.

Edited October 25, 201213 yr by Deestroy All

rumour melb is going for ben warren from north

Gosh.....id rather keep our Jetta's Bennell's, Petterds and Macdonalds

Barrell just gets deeper and deeper.

Edited: Fixed Mc to Mac

Edited October 25, 201213 yr by olisik

Gosh.....id rather keep our Jetta's Bennell's, Petterds and Mcdonalds

Barrell just gets deeper and deeper.

Get your Mc & Mac right OL.

We aren't getting rid of Tom

Get your Mc & Mac right OL.

We aren't getting rid of Tom

He did get it right, he wants to trade Tom.

On Trade Radio a Liam Pickering (Player Agent) has just said that North was also interested in Rodan. Am I alone in feeling happy about this giving they're being unreasonable with their demands for pedersen???

Edited October 25, 201213 yr by pm24

alos apparently we are talking to port about Jacobs

Good out of contract pick up in PSD

I was thinking if Eagles want Morton can we try and get a straight swap for Ash Smith. Victorian boy might be happy to come home.

You need to read a couple of the other threads. This was a troll exercise that caught Jay CLark...

What the hell are we doing? Byrnes, Rodan, Dawes on half a mill a year!! Looking at a very average outside player in Ray, a VFL swingman, and Ben Warren!

Welcome to trading for beginners.

We've got a new regime making the decisions. Let's assume a group of professionals know what they are doing until it's proven otherwise. After all, their future depends on them getting things right (unlike us posters).

We've got a new regime making the decisions. Let's assume a group of professionals know what they are doing until it's proven otherwise. After all, their future depends on them getting things right (unlike us posters).

Like how we assumed the group of professionals of the last 5 year would work and knew what they were doing?

We've got a new regime making the decisions. Let's assume a group of professionals know what they are doing until it's proven otherwise. After all, their future depends on them getting things right (unlike us posters).

I don't think we have to assume they're doing whats needed, as this infers we're all worried about the direction, of getting cheap mature players onto our list, as we jettison some young ones who haven't put in.

I think there are many here who are happy we are grabbing some mature types who can take the wheel & charge a new direction, as our kids relearn they're ways.

I, for one am happy with this sudden change, But would have liked to have had P13 or P20 still available for the draft. But all in all, am relieved on our direction so far.