Adelaide paid overs

Sometime you need to pay what seems to be "overs" to the get the quality required.

I put to you that to beat them we would have had to dig really deep and give up picks in next years draft that would be difficult to justify.

For adelaide to be on top here crouch would have to be a top 10 pick (probably is) and brown top 15 (does not seem to be on consensus).

You are right, to lock them in you need to pay overs. I just didnt want to see us miss out and someone get a bargain.

TradeWeekRadio [

The Crows confirm they've secured pick 2 and will go after Brad Crouch #tradeweek

Big waste of time on our behalf and we continue to waste our time in chasing Mitch Clarke. Seriously, what are we doing?

Its never a wste of time and people have to understand the finely construed web of values. Its not always what you do over here>>>>>>>

<<<<<<<that affects over here

The thing that is clear to me is the Harrington doesnt seem like he wants to pay overs for anything, doesnt want to look dumb ect

He also knows that with 3 picks around 12 we WILL recruit 3 good players, Prendergast has a good strike rate imo hasnt recruited any players who wernt worth the pick we used, Gysberts was a nice little pick up, as Gawn, Cook is early but i like the idea. 3 of these kids will make me quite happy 3 good first round choices and we will all forget about this

Edit + Viney = Wins

Edited October 13, 201114 yr by Jordie_tackles