Jump to content

Worst Umpiring Decision Ever?

Featured Replies

Posted

Was the free kick paid against Jack Grimes in front of goal in the third quarter, for holding the ball, the worst decision ever, or just this year?

 

Was the free kick paid against Jack Grimes in front of goal in the third quarter, for holding the ball, the worst decision ever, or just this year?

It WAS bad but there have been worse - and all gainst the Dees.

Edited by joeboy

Was the free kick paid against Jack Grimes in front of goal in the third quarter, for holding the ball, the worst decision ever, or just this year?

Nope. The OOF that came off Martin's (IIRC) knee that we got was a howler. Still I'll take it.

 

What about when Bennell took that mark and wasn't paid because he 'bumped' the lions guy


It WAS bad but there have been worse - and all gainst the Dees

That was a shocker!! There were other bad ones but that was potentially the most costly of the game for sure.

Jack had NO chance of getting rid of the ball.

The commentators were all saying the same thing. The stupid ump had no idea - how could you even try and hit it out with your arm pinned to the ground??

It was a shocker, the Martin on-the-full was a disgrace as well - the other way.

 
  • Author

Ever!

Yep, Ever. The Martin decision was unsighted, so forgiveable, but there was no precedent either this game or any this year for the Grimes decision. Taking the ball on, no prior opportunity, and ridden into the ground from behind. All in full sight of the umpire. Inexplicable!!!

Was the free kick paid against Jack Grimes in front of goal in the third quarter, for holding the ball, the worst decision ever, or just this year?

Agreed a shocking decision, but you can't just lay there, you must a least go through the motions of trying to get rid of the ball, even if a big oaf like Fev is on top of you grinding you into the turf.


Umpires make these sort of mistakes all the time. I have seen it in alot of games, don't think it's something that is only reserved for us. On another note, anybody still noticing how having the louder crowd helps?

  • Author

Agreed a shocking decision, but you can't just lay there, you must a least go through the motions of trying to get rid of the ball, even if a big oaf like Fev is on top of you grinding you into the turf.

I think you'll find the umpire paid the decision for the tackle, i.e. before there was any attempt to get rid of it, thus somehow deemed prior opportunity!

Brennan also got pinged for holding the ball when he was barely tackled.

The oof one was terrible! They were guessing all night the boundary umpires!

  • Author

It was a shocker, the Martin on-the-full was a disgrace as well - the other way.

Martin decision more than made up for by the Bennell out of bounds decision (3rd Quarter), as he was about to run into an open goal. I had perfect line of sight on it, and it wasn't out of bounds, not even close! The boundary umpire did not have line of sight, so it was a guess, but I guess to be fair a lot of boundary decisions are.

Brennan also got pinged for holding the ball when he was barely tackled.

The oof one was terrible! They were guessing all night the boundary umpires!

Saw that one again on Channel 7 this morning. Brennan did his one hand pick-up thing, DEFINITELY had possession. Just couldn't get his foot or other hand around to make contact and the ball just lamely dropped out.

The boundary umpires struggled to keep up with the pace, didn't they?!


Bad decisions are only important if they happen at significant times or in significant places. Grimes was stiff. It had the potential to turn the game. Dees were also very stiff with a couple of 'holding the ball' decisions that could have gone against the Lions.

I think you'll find the umpire paid the decision for the tackle, i.e. before there was any attempt to get rid of it, thus somehow deemed prior opportunity!

Correct. As Grimes was falling to the ground with Fev in his back the umpire paid the free. Grimes had just picked up the ball and had not even stood up, he was still hunched down when tackled. Along with the TV commentators who i heard when I got home, I agree it was disgraceful. The umpire was number 24 Jennings. That was one of a number of shockers by him, including taking a great mark off Bennell close to goal. It may have been his first game. He was given the ball to carry off at the end and the two boundary umpires ran to him as soon as the siren sounded.

If it was his first game I don't want to destroy his umpiring career, I actually think he did it himself last night. That was the worst display by an umpire in a senior match that I can recall. I am glad it didn't cost us the game. In my opinion he could have been involved in 20 incorrect decisions throughout the night.

Anyway, enough of umpire bashing, more importantly we played fantastic footy and we won and the boys were great.

Edited by Redleg

Umpire Jennings. I'd never heard of him until last night. Must be a rookie/new umpire or something.

He was responsible for the Grimes HTB, possibly the worst HTB decision I've seen in a long time. Absolutely terrible decision.

He was also responsible for the Bennell in the back, which was again an awful decision. That 'bump', if there was enough contact for it to be considered a bump, was to the side of the player. Nothing illegal about it.

I believe he may have also been responsible for the decision to pay in the back against McDonald, which was clearly not in the back, but rather it was holding the ball (that might have been another umpire, don't know).

Just terrible stuff. Really, all 3 of them were off their game last night.

Hopefully as we improve we'll begin to get the better umpires instead of (possibly) rookies.

Edit: And the Martin OOF: horrible. Surely in moments of doubt they should just throw it in?

Edited by titan_uranus

I'm actually ashamed of the way I went off at that decision last night (the F word was flying freely). Apologies for anyone who has to sit around me at the footy. I'm insufferable at the best of the times, but that nearly pushed me over the edge.

DISGUSTING decision, and against my boy Jack too! :mad:

  • Author

I'm actually ashamed of the way I went off at that decision last night (the F word was flying freely). Apologies for anyone who has to sit around me at the footy. I'm insufferable at the best of the times, but that nearly pushed me over the edge.

DISGUSTING decision, and against my boy Jack too! :mad:

I can be an embarrassment to sit near also, to myself and others, but that decision was so bad, the abuse just failed to come. As George on Seinfeld would have it, 'I was speechless, I had no speech'.


What about when Bennell took that mark and wasn't paid because he 'bumped' the lions guy

The Grimes one was a disgrace, but Benellys was just as bad. This was text book perfect by Bennell on how you should outmuscle an opponent to mark the ball. No sign of hands and his bump was clearly not even in his back, but his side.

There were howlers for both sides, we just seem to get them right in front of goal!

Yep, Ever. The Martin decision was unsighted, so forgiveable, but there was no precedent either this game or any this year for the Grimes decision. Taking the ball on, no prior opportunity, and ridden into the ground from behind. All in full sight of the umpire. Inexplicable!!!

The Martin one was right in front of the boundary umpire! He's in big trouble for that one. You cannot be 10 mts from the play and make such poor decisions! Especially when you consider Goods was 2mts behind Stef. Boundary will spend a long time at VFL.

Umpire Jennings. I'd never heard of him until last night. Must be a rookie/new umpire or something.

He was responsible for the Grimes HTB, possibly the worst HTB decision I've seen in a long time. Absolutely terrible decision.

He was also responsible for the Bennell in the back, which was again an awful decision. That 'bump', if there was enough contact for it to be considered a bump, was to the side of the player. Nothing illegal about it.

I believe he may have also been responsible for the decision to pay in the back against McDonald, which was clearly not in the back, but rather it was holding the ball (that might have been another umpire, don't know).

Jennings looked like a blonde Screech!!! There should also be an enquiry into Hayden Kennedy's "preformance" last night.

 

I thought the Jamie Bennell decision was far worse. What did he do wrong? Nothing, it was Text Book effective.

As i recall the Bears scored on the rebound-i can't quite recall as i was still yelling abuse!!!

That was a shocker!! There were other bad ones but that was potentially the most costly of the game for sure.

Jack had NO chance of getting rid of the ball.

The commentators were all saying the same thing. The stupid ump had no idea - how could you even try and hit it out with your arm pinned to the ground??

The umpiring alnight was woeful. Just ask James Strauss what prior op means !!


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 15 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 0 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 13 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 196 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Like
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies