Jump to content

Are we fit??

Featured Replies

Posted

Just an observation, but for a team that has been training since October, shouldn't we have run out the match better than we did?

I thought we didn't have any legs in the last quarter.

 
Just an observation, but for a team that has been training since October, shouldn't we have run out the match better than we did?

I thought we didn't have any legs in the last quarter.

have you thought about player experience...4 first gamers

 

with all the youngsters they have had limited pre seasons at afl level.

Were as most other teams players average about 5 pre seasons big difference.

Over the next year or so You should notice the fitness levels soar.

BUT, there were 18 other players out there.

How many games played by the other 18....can't you wait as I have for over 40 years for success or will you give them away


It was a warm day and we ran hard for 3 quarters and just ran out of petrol. Guys like Rivers, Moloney, McLean etc are still coming back from long term injuries and we had 4 first gamers. Today we looked slow more than anything. Their smaller players killed us all day.

You can be fit,

but if you aint got the quality, you aint got it!

it was either lack of fitmess or complete and utter laziness. The number of times we let North players lead us to the ball whilst we were jogging after them was a highlight for mine. Disappointing for mine since the early start was highlighted so much.

 

Whether its fitness, sloth or some form of leprosy, that's the third time in five matches this year including the preseason that we've been flogged in the last quarter when the game was up for grabs. The players should be more disappointed with the end scoreline than the supporters today. They owed themselves more than that after an improved effort in the first three quarters.

Whether its fitness, sloth or some form of leprosy, that's the third time in five matches this year including the preseason that we've been flogged in the last quarter when the game was up for grabs. The players should be more disappointed with the end scoreline than the supporters today. They owed themselves momre than that after an improved effort in the first three quarters.

I thought it wasn't just last qtr it was stages of every qtr that is what is so annoying. The amount of times North easuly moved it up the ground to there f50


Just an observation, but for a team that has been training since October, shouldn't we have run out the match better than we did?

I thought we didn't have any legs in the last quarter.

Q/ Are we fit?

Yes.

I was listening to one of the senior players interviewed at the 'G' yesterday, he said they were all leg sore after the first game of the season at the 'G'.

Probably that & mental fatigue with such a young side.

No.

We arnt the fittest at the moment. But our decision making was poor at times also. They looked fatigued!

I expected the first year players Jetta and Bennell to struggle with 4 quarters and it showed. Jetta's first half was good though I thought!

These two need match fitness at this level. Give them time.

The players coming back from injury also looked lethargic at times. Again they need time.

However, I thought North were far better in getting free when attacking. Thats where are fitness level difficiency showed big time.

They're fit.

But with 12 players 21 or younger and Rivers, Moloney, and McLean coming back after a long time out we are going to have fade-outs.

Really great to see Rivers running around but Moloney was fantastic, and McLean was quiet and still had 7 clearances.

Good signs.

If you are referring to aerobic fitness I'd say we are pretty even with most clubs. The difference is the impact the body takes from the contact during the game and this affects the players ability to keep running over the game. Older/mature bodies can take these hits and keep running, lighter bodies can'. If you ever played senior footy, thin how it felt being a colt to a senior player when you play colts. Colts run fast but not after a few bumps or heavy tackles.

  • Author
How many games played by the other 18....can't you wait as I have for over 40 years for success or will you give them away

I've followed them since I was a little tacker, er..sum 51 years now, just an observation and wondered what everyone else thought.

And as far as 'will you give them away', I will only stop following them when I can't breathe anymore......hopefully I've got a few more years left????? :D


If you are referring to aerobic fitness I'd say we are pretty even with most clubs. The difference is the impact the body takes from the contact during the game and this affects the players ability to keep running over the game. Older/mature bodies can take these hits and keep running, lighter bodies can'. If you ever played senior footy, thin how it felt being a colt to a senior player when you play colts. Colts run fast but not after a few bumps or heavy tackles.

That was pretty much the way I saw it. We just began to get out muscled the longer the game went. Those muscles don't get any softer as the game goes on and we can expect it to happen a lot more this season but in a year or two the kids will be bigger and fitter and will be able to do it to other clubs.

Alarmingly our fadeout in the last quarter has been evident in 4 of the 5 competitive games we've played and lost this year .

- final quarter against Hawthorn , where we gave up a 5 goal lead at 3/4 time and lost

- final quarter against Sydney , after being even at 3/4 time and lost

- final quarter against Footscray , after being within a goal at 3/4 time and lost by heaps

- final quarter against North , after being close at 3/4 time and lost by heaps .

Yes I know there are extenuating circumstances and the young players should be commended for their competitiveness , but the facts are that we appear to run out of steam !

I can't believe that it's a lack of general fitness. And don't give me this bullsh#t about having young players, or players coming back from injury. Every team has them.

IMO, it's a mindset. The players expend so much energy for so little scoreboard reward, as soon as the opposition get scoreboard supremacy, we drop our bundle. Look at all the beltings we copped last season.

I can't believe that it's a lack of general fitness. And don't give me this bullsh#t about having young players, or players coming back from injury. Every team has them.

IMO, it's a mindset. The players expend so much energy for so little scoreboard reward, as soon as the opposition get scoreboard supremacy, we drop our bundle. Look at all the beltings we copped last season.

To a degree I agree with this assessment. The body language of some of the players in the last quarter backs this up. A combination of slow older players and many youngsters is quite fitting with this result unfortunately.

Another thing that makes us "look" unfit is our lack of organisation around the ground. Watching that game from a pocket I noticed that our fastest players were rarely in the right spots of the ground outside the square. At one stopage, we had Miller, Bate and Johnson in close vicinity against fast agile players from the Kangas. The Kangas had the right players at the right spot of the ground most of the time. Needless to say that the Roos sharked it and sped off so quick that our guys looked like they were in slow motion. I guess Bailey will work on this throughout the season but it certainly hurts us and takes us right out of the contest. Around half forward, our players were so slow off the mark sometimes that I think they didn't bother chasing as they were left in their opponents dust. Our faster players need to be used more effectively over 4 quarters but as a whole we are still a slow team IMO.

I can't believe that it's a lack of general fitness. And don't give me this bullsh#t about having young players, or players coming back from injury. Every team has them.

IMO, it's a mindset. The players expend so much energy for so little scoreboard reward, as soon as the opposition get scoreboard supremacy, we drop our bundle. Look at all the beltings we copped last season.

You can add lack or forward line presence or personnel too.

Yes we are fit.

But our side lacks these values which enable a side to "compete consistently": -

1) Experience

2) Structure

3) Skill/Quality (composure under pressure)

When you are lacking in these areas OR lacking of these components compared to other teams....you're more often than not facing an uphill battle.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Haha
    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 372 replies