Diamond_Jim

Some popular sub titled series: Deutschland 83 ( German spy drama... light hearted but serious subject) Engregage/Spiral ( Fantastic French Crime Show) Spin ( Another French Political drama. Very good.) The Legacy ( Danish Family Drama) 1864 ( Danish war classic about their war with Prussia ... in a way the Danish Gallipoli) and for a change one of my favourites: Lillehammer (not too dark comedy)

Hard to get excited when Lloyd Williams wins yet again but you cannot knock him for his investment in the staying side of the game. Lovely interview with the winning jockey's daughters. Bruce was not too OTT. Now .. onto the Oaks !!

You always needed to close your eyes when Biffen was kicking for goal. Not unknown for him to miss from 10-15 metres out dead in front.

Thanks Macca ....not too bad... could be a lot worse. I was thinking of going over for a few of the early matches. Doesn't need to be an Oz game. I am very much an independent traveller so if anyone has ideas of how you do it would be very grateful.

Cahill to Honduras is a strange move...... Mind games with the other side is all I can think of. Conditions in Honduras will be a killer with kick off temp around 30 and humidity at 80%. Not confident at all given the lack lustre performance against Syria. Would like to think otherwise but Sydney could be a dead rubber if we go down 3-0 which is not impossible. This game of all out attack and then stop and wait 30 metres out from goal just does not strike me as a sound game plan in these play off games. The Kruse knockers at least will be silent. Time for Juric to shine if we are to go anywhere. I know it is a long way off but what is the time zone for the World Cup in Russia. Would be fantastic if we could have a 4pm game local Melbourne time (record and watch ) followed by a 7pm game. In these days of mass internet coverage it is hard to avoid results if the games are played overnight our time.

So after much analysis I have narrowed it down to the following three: 6: Red Cardinal 9: Max Dynamite 21: Thomas Hobson with of course Tiberian as the emotional bet

As usual a bit of a lottery. My usual process is to eliminate all horses who have never placed over the distance and then take it from there. The Cup is becoming a little bit of an anachronism in modern day racing and has become even harder to relate to as more and more horses do not run in the lead up races. Anyway I shall study the form and give my tip in an hour or so. The cool weather should favour the Europeans but as most of the horses are foreign bred who knows. The Japanese contingent do not seem to be here this year which is a pity. Good Luck

slightly on topic but what would people say to some fringe players from each team.. say six... heading to the Northern Territory and playing in the NT comp over the summer. Could make for an interesting TV filler with say one or two games a week televised. Would be a great boost to NT and wouldn't do the fringe players much harm either from an exposure viewpoint. Each AFL team could align itself with an NT team. Better the AFL X or whatever it's called.

How can one go past Tiberian .... every punter's dream: http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/11/02/tiberian-the-worlds-most-unlikely-melbourne-cup-horse-came-from-caesar-the-teaser-pony_a_23265188/ "But Tiberius Caesar found a calling as a teaser. He teased diligently and he teased well. They even had a nickname for him at the Haras du Logis stud. They called him "Caesar the Teaser". And eventually, the staff took pity on him. At the end of the breeding season, Caesar The Teaser was allowed to mate with the mare Toamasina. The result was Tiberian -- who has won six of his 17 races and will be ridden by top French jockey Olivier Peslier in the Melbourne Cup on Tuesday." Must say I enjoy listening to Kevin Bartlett and Doctor Turf on SEN for these big race days. Great background while pottering in the garden. The TV coverage (other than the races themselves) leaves me increasingly bored.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-28/vic-prospect-wooller-grilled-by-crows-over-loyalty sounds interesting... I like the idea of a big mid fielder. If the scrum game plan continues the strong mid fielder becomes a valuable player

Cannot forget that 1987 prelim final incident. Tuck and Dipper lined him up and sandwiched him deliberately from both sides with strong simultaneous shoulder bumps. Legal bastardry but it has always colored my memory of Tuck.

Both GWS and Adelaide played the flanks and gave Richmond the corridor. The traditional forward delivery to the pocket seems to be the easiest to zone against as it allows the ball to be taken out of bounds as well as rebounded. Of course the empty forward line also slows delivery which does not help the traditional forward. Will be interesting to see if the traditional teams change their game plan to counter the scrum or as I call it helter skelter. Would love to see a permanent forward about 70 metres out from goal trialled.

There was a great movie called the Wrong Box. It is about a group of parents in 19th century England who each contribute 0ne thousand ponds to a fund (the tontine) which is to be paid to the last of the children to die. Of course by that time it is worth a literal fortune. Perhaps we could all contribute to such a fund thus giving the survivor a chance to attend our next GF. With my MFCSS firmly on perhaps we should enter any newborns as they might stand a chance !!

Thanks M9 In 2015 the Bulldogs charged $110 as the add on that got you the GFG. After the 2016 GF this category maxed out. My friend who is a Doggies supporter thinks there are 12K in the Bulldogs Social Club (the GFG category) though this seems high to me . If he is correct at $200 per member for the 2018 season that is a cool $2.4M extra

I named the four (possibly five) we rank above .. that leaves 12 after you deduct MFC ?? Here's my original post: By comparison to 12 odd other clubs in the league our last 3-4 years have been financially weak. Only GCS, GWS, Brisbane, North and maybe Freo or Saints are likely to have done worse. At best we are treading water.

okay ... of the 12 clubs I mentioned ... who have we substantially out performed over the last 3-4 years. Comparing us to our previous basket case is not enough in the sense that while we have been moving to our break even situation the bulk of the clubs have been powering away. And remember to compare like with like and compare operating profits. Then look at what other clubs are doing with their operating profits to move in front of the pack. Clubs are non profit organizations so they look to reduce net profit. Operating profit is the key. If you really want to see how badly we are performing .. remove the AFL equalisation payments. (I don't recommend this because as Macca has pointed out these payments are in truth to make up for the fact that we along with a few other clubs are shafted by the fixed draw.) Just to finish off... I am not complaining about the job done over the last three years but am merely trying to emphasise that without a tectonic shift we are not going anywhere fast financially.

By comparison to 12 odd other clubs in the league our last 3-4 years have been financially weak. Only GCS, GWS, Brisbane, North and maybe Freo or Saints are likely to have done worse. At best we are treading water.

Does anyone know how many clubs have closed GFG categories (ie there is a waiting list). As posted earlier Footscray is a closed list and I suspect many of the other bigger clubs are closed as well. I see a new/increasing revenue spinner here as they up the price and people have to pay up or lose out to those on the waiting list. Cannot stand auto renewals of anything. AFL membership moved to that last year. At least I got an email saying they were going to renew next week unless I opted out.

Agree and Davey at his best. (remember it is most exciting .. not best). The absolute best when on song and unfortunately that was not often.... Travis Johnstone...... third quarter against Adelaide in a final at the MCG..... best I have ever seen played.

Get ready to play the Hawks in Tassie next year: Jeff Kennett arguing that more Melbourne based teams should play the Hawks in Tasmania "While I respect those teams, I have long argued that the Tasmanian community would like to see some of the older Melbourne clubs on our schedule. It is very disappointing for Tasmanians who love their football and we believe they should be given better recognition by those who administer the game. " He also wants the hawks to be the first club to 100,000 members http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/jeff-kennett-says-hawthorn-deserved-a-better-afl-2018-fixture-in-tasmania-20171101-gzcsgi.html

do the clubs publish how many of these they have sold? If for example I was a Collingwood supporter (god help me) does it mean that of the 20k or whatever number is available to club members that it is likely that say 15k have already been allocated via the GFG scheme?

Good idea Macca. Ironically not that long ago the five or six powerhouse clubs (including Adelaide and West Coast) used to get together before AFL meetings to discuss their strategy. Not sure if they still do it officially but I am sure they keep the back door communications open. The problems for the lesser clubs is that they have competing agendas in the sense that GCS, GWS, and Brisbane are alter egos of the AFL. That only leaves the four Vic clubs (North, Dogs, Saints and MFC) to argue the alternative strategies.

So very true Redleg. I have been trying to explain that success in itself will not deliver a sound club. As you know the AFL/VFL as we now know it came about when the clubs were on their knees. They have done a very good job but the incessant pursuit of money (called fan satisfaction or the like) means that the lesser 4 Vic clubs will always be there just to make up the numbers.

The grand final guarantee is a bit of a con given the number of times it actually pays out for the MFC. At the reported price of $220 odd that would mean an unadjusted cost of $5k per GF appearance based upon our historical performance. I assume one also has to pay the actual $150 odd for the ticket itself. At an extra $50- $100 one can think of it as a simple donation but it is now becoming serious money. Would be interested to hear what other clubs charge for their GF lottery.

Good analysis. The flip side is that because all sides are even the chances of building sustained success are minimal. Thus financial survival/improvement becomes even more important. To do that we need an uncompromised draw that gives us a reasonable chance of attracting supporters, sponsors etc.