Demonised

Let's try a thought experiment, imagining what would happen if there was no prior opportunity rule. 1. Player takes possession, avoids tacklers, instigates play. 2. Player takes possession, is tackled correctly, makes an attempt at correct disposal, umpire immediately calls for a ball-up. 3. Player takes possession, is tackled correctly, makes no attempt at correct disposal or disposes incorrectly, umpire rewards tackler with a free kick. 4. Player takes possession, is tackled incorrectly, umpire pays free kick to player. Does this make a messy situation simpler? No having to decide whether the player had prior opportunity or not. It takes one complicating factor out of the equation. Or am I oversimplifying?

As soon as anyone brings up 'greatest ever' the discussion is thrown open to the history of the game, isn't it? Besides, Bradman isn't known as the greatest ever because he scored the most runs of any cricketer ever, it's because of his amazing average. By that measure, Peter Hudson is the top, with a 5.64 goals per game average, superior to Plugger's 4.84. But I'm just quibbling. Lockett was a legend, undoubtedly.

'Greatest forward'? Bob Pratt might have something to say about that, and so would Peter Hudson.

Keyser Söze

Does anyone know how you can get the member thank you cheap donuts on Sunday by showing your membership card when you've opted for mobile membership and don't have a card?

It's a long season.

An effort to justify the call in the Swans/Geelong game last night?

Beautiful. Oh, how long I've waited to hear that the tables have been turned this much.

Two words I really don't want to hear after tonight's game: 'reality check'.

Two questions - 'Why do they?' and 'Why don't they?' - both have the same answer: money.

Clarkson worries me. He's a good gameday coach.

Never understood why our clash jumper isn't simply a reverse - red body with navy yoke.

And sunscreen.

'Mistah Kurtz, he dead."

There's more and better help on this site than from Ticketek. Kudos to you all.

Yep $3.15 here too, general admission.

The cult of recency. Best player in the last ten years? Arguably. Twenty? Possibly. One hundred and twenty? Doubtful.

Just Buddy's 'natural arc'.

The club gets pilloried for poor player development but when it takes its time with a young player it also gets criticised ...

He was one of those sports people who, like Walter Lindrum, had the rules of the game changed to limit his effectiveness.

Our first draft pick. He's already a champion in my eyes, whoever he is.

I'm 50/50 about this topic.

He's really got the yips. He's Ian Baker-Fritsch.