daisycutter

quite. sheedy nevber really got the media spotlight put on him for this decision. nor gws for that matter

dorks ressies > myrtleford > demons

a whole f'n thread just for maclure......only on demonland

i seem to remember it was more the aflpa that said that (re breach of contract conditions) and the afl didn't make a ruling one way or the other so, a player would need to claim that essendrug breached a condition of the contract which essendrugs (knowing them) could contest and lawyer up

did you notice how the sky looked, earl? a bit dodgy? crumbly maybe?

brilliant. again enyaw cuts through the doublespeak, spin and political correctness to get right to the point.

i agree. spare the rod and spoil the brat. bitters is obviously in denial of his immoderations

such desecration of your artistic treasures reminds me of what isis did to palmyra, bbo i wonder if you might be able to retrieve them from the way-back machine on the web. they should be preserved for posterity on the other hand, they were a bit of tosh if one was sober

and it depends a bit on whether it is settled out of court or goes to court which i would imagine depends a lot on the insurer and whether essendon benefactors step in with some big bucks because it really could be big bucks. The players not at the club could be the big stumbling blocks. if it goes to court (and there is a reasonable chance) it has the potential to get really nasty and destroy relationships (what's left) between the players and the club plenty more fun to come

35k by round one (including those on the day) now looks doable (only 250/day)

well despite what de-luded might say about the northern side, this is where you need to get a reserved seat as others have said. if you like to be close to the wing the mfc have a reserved seat area on level one just to the east (richmond) side of the members. they have both open air seating and for a liitle more $$s under cover seating further back. i'm sure this area is not fully booked by season regulars and if you get in quick you should get a decent choice and be among birds of a feather

dees to win 5th game on the trot next week

who's craig jennings?........oh, i see what you mean

well ernest, lets hope he's not right about him leaving his mortal coil before our next premiership

re melksham: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-2016-clubs-wont-be-rushed-on-rookie-upgrades-20160314-gnimke.htm re general rookie rules

i don't think heppell (or the others) will admit to any guilt why they are in the process of suing the club not that i think they will either when the litigation is over

according to hird there are a couple of dirty players who didn't tell the truth to asada still playing at essendon

just wasted 2 mins of my life

time for a sicky?

for someone who delights in digging up and broadcasting the (perceived) transgressions of individuals in the past this is a strange position for you to now take

anything less than 40k will be a fail

you're scaring me, moonie

you're going to a monastery? not with stuie i hope? or is that double talk for going into rehab, moonie?

no, why should they? it's common sense, and the issue is not 'basketball' as such, it's about risky procedures like slam dunking which you would know if you ever tried one, plus still being on a rehab program. (naturally, i am assuming he actually was slam dunking based on reports i can't verify)

good of the game = protecting the brand = covering our arses