Demonstone

Too late. The information has leaked that it was in fact George Gawn. He looks older than his tender years due to his inherited extraordinary height.

Lyon, Tingay, Charles and Prymke last played for Melbourne in the 1990s.

You hope he risks a further suspension?

Liam burned very brightly but, alas, burned very quickly.

Ee i ee i oh.

On that I would think that 100% of us would agree.

How do you know that he doesn't have a big mortgage to pay down over the course of his career?

I know that some people love to embrace the Geelong conspiracy theories, but is it really such a surprise that a wealthy individual who loves surfing and plays for Geelong would live near Bells Beach?

Did Aaron Davey ever play a single game in the backline? Odd selection for back pocket.

Sounds like you could do with a couple yourself.

I want to see Stephen Quartermain interviewing Harvey Langford. SQ: "Hello, Harves." HL: "Hello, Quarters."

I hope our new Bond is James and not Alan.

Thanks Chris.

Very pleasant viewing. Thanks @Timothy Reddan-A'Blew. Some random observations: * Nine goals EACH in the first quarter! * Gus Brayshaw's dad Mark playing for North * Garry Lyon not playing (surely injured) * Allen Jakovich kicking goals in the magoos but yet to make an impression at senior level * No over the top goal celebration carry on * We were blessed with a lot of talent and should have won at least one flag in that era

If you're running an ad blocker, try turning it off.

I'm laughing at you, not with you. There is so much wrong with your post. What you call "0" is day one of year one. (1 AD) Because the first year (1 AD) was completed and the second year (2 AD) commenced. No contradiction. No, the century ends at the end of xx00. That was my point from the beginning. I've made my case as clearly as I can and won't clog up this thread any longer. You do you.

Your arithmetic is faulty. When 1 BC ended, 1 AD commenced. There is no year zero. How could there be?

Jesus, another one. Google it mate. It's a fact and not a matter of anybody's opinion.

Are J. Lonergan and J. Longergan another of Scott's ruses?

Lovely to see a new torturer assume the mantle! Is Nick Dal Santo meant to be named twice?

It's the truth that confused a lot of gullible people at the time. 2000 was the 2000th year but didn't turn 2000 until the end of it. At the completion of 2000 years, the next year/century/millennium commenced. That was at 0:001 on 1/1/2001. Let's say you're 70 years old. You've completed 70 years on the planet and are now in your 71st year. You won't turn 71 until the end of the year, even though you're in year 71. It's not a difficult concept to grasp, but many still don't get it. edit: Google a reputable source of your choice if you still have any doubts.

" Zat" would have been more succinct.

As you were. The new millennium didn't start until 1st January 2001. (2000 was the last year of the old one.)

Sorry mate, but that title has already been claimed.