titan_uranus

He should but I wouldn't want him to in case he gets injured. We look a million times better with him in defense than without him. He reads the play really well. I also liked Warnock's game yesterday, it was one of only a few times I'd seen him play and he surprised me a bit with his spoiling. Also liked Garland and Frawley but then again they'll all look good today from that game when we controlled the ball for a half of football.

You could easily hear his voice from the top floor of the members stand. It was amazing. I think it helped Moloney.

Everyone who showed up should be congratulated. It definitely sounded like more than 19,000. I wish we played someone other than Adelaide in Adelaide next, because a loss there won't help the size of the crowd the week after vs Hawthorn

Ahh, isn't hindsight funny sometimes

Yeh the way he said 'great game plan' makes it sound like he's trying to get the media off DB's back. The players are all saying its them and not Bailey, so I guess they're all sticking up for him.

Well it all depends on which Freo shows up. We'll beat em if the Freo that played Richmond shows up, but we're in trouble if last week's Freo shows up

No that's not quite right - you need to win less than 5 games for two consecutive years, not win 8 or less over the two years.

Great deal - and I'm glad there's money in it for the club.

Does the system whereby the first 5 picks go to the new teams come into effect in the 2009 draft or 2010?

Is it just me or are these stats somewhat underwhelming (except for hitouts)?

Yeh good point, when I said plenty I guess I meant 2, but then again Freo probably couldn't find more than 2 players on our list who would worry them

Ummm, shouldn't there be another possible choice?

I wouldn't put Josh Carr at the top of Melbourne's list of worries. There are plenty of other players at Fremantle who will pose much more of a problem.

Well thats 2 weeks more than I expected so now W.C. are genuine contenders.

I wanted to compare this horror start to the year with how we did in 1997, another horror year: 1997 Round 1: Melbourne def Nth Melb 70 to 55 Round 2: Melbourne lost to Collingwood 56 to 163 Round 3: Melbourne lost to Sydney 91 to 99 Round 4: Melbourne lost to Bulldogs 87 to 89 Round 5: Melbourne lost to West Coast 78 126 Round 6: Melbourne lost to St Kilda 35 to 121 After 6 rounds: Average PF: 69.5 Average PA: 108.8 Average Losing margin: 50.2 2008 Round 1: Melbourne lost to Hawthorn 50 to 154 Round 2: Melbourne lost to Bulldogs 66 to 161 Round 3: Melbourne lost to Geelong 82 to 112 Round 4: Melbourne lost to Nth Melb 79 to 127 Round 5: Melbourne lost to Carlton 68 to 101 Round 6: Melbourne lost to Brisbane 85 to 137 After 6 rounds Average PF: 71.7 Average PA: 132.0 Average Losing margin: 60.3 We are scoring more than in 1997 on average but are conceding 4 more goals per game. Both years no scores over 100. However there was a win in 1997 and 2 losses of less than 10 points. So we've started off worse in every respect except points for, which I find quite amazing.

I saw this on TV too, he really was shocking to be honest. I know its early days yet, but unfortunately I think this experiment is unlikely to pay off. Hopefully though PJ gets himself right soon, Jake Spencer develops at Sandy/Sandy reserves and then next year maybe add Naitanui to the list. I haven't seen much of Newton, is he playing well in Sandy, because if he's not then he doesn't deserve a spot in the team.

I like it. However I think Robertson needs to go, if only to give him the message that his position is not safe regardless of his crap performances. He needs to know that mediocrity will result in playing for Sandy. So drop Robbo, and play Dunn out of the goalsquare.

Last year, Round 4 at the MCG Melb vs Fremantle (by the way at that point both clubs were 0 and 3) attracted a crowd of 16,654. So I'll predict 16,654.

I'm scared about the likely smallness of the crowd this sunday.

The annoying thing is that if the priority pick rules hadn't been changed from how they were in 2005 when Carlton, Collingwood and Hawthorn shared the first 6 picks, then we would be in with a real chance to get both. We may well win 2, 1 or even 0 games all year, and in return we get a relatively meek pick no. 17 or something.

Missed the start - why was Garland out? Injured? I thought Sylvia improved towards the end, but I was only listening. Apparantly Jamar started well... can't decide whether to be happy or not.

I'm young, but I've seen a lot of footy and we're playing the worst of any team I can recall ever seeing. Having said that I don't think we're too far away from turning it around. We have to remember that most teams go through a crap phase at some point, its part of the cycle. Hopefully all our crap years have come at once, so that we'll only spend 1 or 2 years more down the bottom before we return to finals footy. It happens to everyone, it just so happens that we're really, really bad at the moment.

I would think that one of Essendon or West Coast will get pick 2. Theres no way either will part ways with it, especially considering we've got nothing to offer. Also if W.C. get it and Kerr wants to leave they'll need it for Rich as a replacement.

OMG we've had 20 more disposals than them. Thats horrible

Maybe you should have responded to the ad in the paper for the coaching job, because now I am a Bailey disbeliever. I previously had faith in him, thought his pre-season was OK, but I am now so incredibly frustrated listening to our absolute insipidness (though apparantly we tried a bit harder in the 3rd quarter). We've gotta try one on one, because there's no way this game plan is going to succeed. 6 attempts to get something right, and we can't. Btw, we haven't scored 100 points yet this year have we? I think the best we've done is 12 goals. This is our problem. I think our defence is actually not as bad as it looks.