Jump to content

Featured Replies

For anyone who has been in a leadership position, the adage certainly rings true 'success has many fathers while failure is an orphan'.

My experience is, when things get exceptionally tough, 90% of people go running the other way or immediately go to the blame game. It's when you find out the true charcter of people. I think most people would be shocked about how this 90% can often include Directors of Boards. I'm making no representations of the MFC Board as I have no knowledge.

My point is, I really feel for Goody. We owe him so much for 2021 and the years of great success.

This is where the CEO and Steven Smith situation is not helping.

Would you like to see Brad Green, the Board, Alan Richardson take some of the heat, be by his side?

 

I have three questions I’d be grateful for the panel to discuss:

  1. Why was Turner dropped? He came in after a 5 goal haul in the VFL, was decent against Geelong (I think our 5th or 6th highest rated player), and yet was dropped despite other players contributing far less.

  2. To what extend is our 4th quarter fade-out the result of conditioning vs attitude? Is there any evidence from demonland training reports that we’re doing heavy loads on the track?

  3. Can you discuss each of our line coaches and their credentials/expertise? And can you discuss the process and status of the CEO search? I’m increasingly worried that the lack of a permanent President, CEO, etc. combined with somewhat make shift coaching arrangements is a key reason why the players look so unhappy and dispirited, particularly the senior players.

7 hours ago, BW511 said:

I’ve played under a number of different coaches in my own local football ‘career’.

One year we had a coach that came in off the back of a finals campaign the year before. We finished second or third last under the new coach with the same list and the entire place was deflated like I’ve never seen before - until now.

That particular coach sucked the life out of the group in the space of 7-8 months and that club has not recovered since, some 20 years later.

Do you guys believe the players are still playing like they trust Goodwin and want him around?

This comment by BW made me think of Nathan Buckley when he stepped down as Pies coach mid-way through the 2021 season after 9 years at the helm (that timing is eerily familiar). In Buckley's last season, I recall the Pies played without passion, as if trying to think too hard about what they were supposed to be doing. Collingwood won only 2 of their first 11 games. Buckley's last game was against the Dees on Queen's Birthday when we were on top of the table - the Pies were revved up and of course they won. But we had the last laugh that season. Robert Harvey became interim coach. Then Craig McCrae came in at the start of 2022 and the Collingwood players responded to his coaching with loving their footy and playing with excitement and passion. After finishing 2nd last in '21, the Pies came within 2 points of winning their Prelim Final in '22 and then they won the flag in '23.

So things can turn really quickly. We have so much talent.

 

My brother and I have been have been discussing the root cause of the sharp decline, and were curious about the teams thoughts on whether Yze was in fact playing a bigger role than he was given credit for? We’ve all worked in jobs where a leader is propped up and perhaps even managed by those below them. Thoughts on this theory and whether Yze would return after his time with Richmond?

Excuse the length of this but I’m trying to find a way to feel better but can’t find the opening!

To state the obvious. We’ve now got a set of coaches that suddenly look alarmingly second rate ( that covers all of fitness , tactics and group cohesion). We have a group of players that now are beginning to look either old, lacking the foot skills and pace for the new game or alternatively young and out of form. In fact I have that same Neeld vibe that the coach has lost the players.

We have a huge % of the salary cap going to 2 players ( trac and Oliver) on long contracts who, in 2025, you could only class as average . We also have probably our current best player ( kozzy) who wants to leave. Plus and perhaps most importantly we have no home base and in this economic climate seem unlikely to get one . We’re all too aware of the myriad of issues that brings us.

I mean forget 2025 this looks like a decade of pain coming. Are we headed back to 2012 or … here’s a scarier thought…are we actually already there and just waking up to the fact !!

So… this is tough tough question for you three. Given the current pall hanging over the entire club is there ANY hope anywhere about this club.


After 1 qtr of ‘acceptable’ football, it is hard to understand what is going on in this group.

Any insights into why we are where we are, and how do we move ahead, would be welcomed!

Fitness.

I’m only educated in the subject in respect of watching decades of footy but watched Hawks training closely in the Kennedy days and the Blues in their premiership years.

At its most simple you need to be able to run and walk for 2 hours. We hear stats of this one and that going 14-15 kms in a game. The Blues at training did 100x 100 metre sprints with a very short time between each sprint

How hard can it be for a handsomely paid fitness person to get handsomely paid professional athletes to run out four quarters. As someone else wrote how did Burgess plan not become part of a Standard Operating Procedure for our club.

The third quarter showed the talent is there, so the issue seems to be application. What are your thoughts on why the players don't seem able or willing to play something approaching good footy for 4 quarters?

 

From the outside looking in the problem seems to be the inability

to carry out the desired game plan.

This has led to a crisis of confidence and a "veil of negativity"

My question is this

Why not play hard and contested and go down fighting?

This would galvanise the players and the supporters.

I would definitely turn up to see that.

Northey's boys weren't the most skilled but they were feared!

  • Author

Thank you to everyone for their contributions. It really is appreciated and these questions and comments form the backbone of our podcast which in essence is an extension of this forum. I am going to cut the questions off here. We certainly have enough questions. Let's see if my cohosts have any answers. I certainly don't and that's not even factoring in any MFCSS.


Interesting that Brown and Lewis on 360 highlighted a couple of instances that struck me on Saturday.

I.e. Viney and Trac not supplying pressure to Menzies.

Multiple instances of hand passes ignored when they should be given to allow runners into space.

Some of the older players are trying to win it by themselves. They need to just bring the whole team in.

This could be seriously quick to fix if they can talk about it.

Edited by DiscoStu17

22 hours ago, Demonland said:

Thank you to everyone for their contributions. It really is appreciated and these questions and comments form the backbone of our podcast which in essence is an extension of this forum. I am going to cut the questions off here. We certainly have enough questions. Let's see if my cohosts have any answers. I certainly don't and that's not even factoring in any MFCSS.

Andy, your rant was very cathartic! Thanks for so effectively expressing your sheer fury. It's mine too!


@Demonland

Thats the best 2 minutes of raw passion I’ve heard from 51:45

I wanted to put the boots on and draw a [censored] sand in the line!

17 minutes ago, Doug Reemer said:

@Demonland

Thats the best 2 minutes of raw passion I’ve heard from 51:45

I wanted to put the boots on and draw a [censored] sand in the line!

It escalated so quickly, haha, loved it

19 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Can we get Goody to play Andy’s address to the playing group, that was a thing of beauty

Collingwood got that [censored] heads mum! Why not??


15 hours ago, DiscoStu17 said:

Interesting that Brown and Lewis on 360 highlighted a couple of instances that struck me on Saturday.

I.e. Viney and Trac not supplying pressure to Menzies.

Multiple instances of hand passes ignored when they should be given to allow runners into space.

Some of the older players are trying to win it by themselves. They need to just bring the whole team in.

This could be seriously quick to fix if they can talk about it.

I observed the same thing for a long time. After each goal especially when it’s getting tough. Max, Viney, Trac and Oliver have a little talk in the middle and you know Max is 99 per cent to win the tap, Viney with head down will charge forward and their defenders are set up for the loose kick.

The coaches lack the ability of older heads to see these things that are more phycological in nature than game plan .

48 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Can we get Goody to play Andy’s address to the playing group, that was a thing of beauty

Great idea!!!

1 hour ago, Doug Reemer said:

@Demonland

Thats the best 2 minutes of raw passion I’ve heard from 51:45

I wanted to put the boots on and draw a [censored] sand in the line!

Same language but totally different tone to the 2021 Grand Final poddy. Two best moments ever on this.

 
3 hours ago, Demonland said:

Apologies for the blue language.

3 hours ago, Demonland said:

Apologies for the blue language.

Andy’s little sister here 🙋🏻‍♀️ longtime listener of the pod.

Dusting off the old Demonland password just to say that if you’ve ever sat next to Andy at the footy when Melbourne is losing, that colourful rant was nothing 😂😂😂


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 24 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies