Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

*sigh* 

Sadly, entirely true. 

But we have 2 of the top 5 best contested players in the comp in the same midfield, just need the outside polish to finish off the good work.

Crazy debut result.

Ranked equal 13th alongside Coniglio and 7th in our 22, just behind Claz.

Combined Ratings - Rnd 1, 2025 vs Giants

Player Rating Rank
Tom Green 5.375 1
L Whitfield 5.175 2
Max Gawn 5.050 3
J Lever 4.500 4
T McDonald 4.350 5
Toby Greene 4.100 6
H Himmelberg 3.925 7
F Callaghan 3.850 8
L  Ash 3.825 9
C Salem 3.750 10
J Bowey 3.725 11
C Oliver 3.500 12
X Lindsay 3.475 13
S Coniglio 3.475 13
T Rivers 3.425 15
J Kelly 3.400 16
T Sparrow 3.300 17
C Petracca 3.225 18
J Buckley 3.175 19
S Taylor 3.125 20
J Viney 2.900 21
L Keeffe 2.875 22
H Petty 2.750 23
C Windsor 2.725 24
C Idun 2.600 25
C Ward 2.575 26
C Brown 2.550 27
Ed Langdon 2.500 28
A Cadman 2.425 29
K Chandler 2.325 30
J Wehr 2.275 31
J Henderson 2.050 32
C Stone 1.975 33
A Johnson 1.950 34
T Bedford 1.850 35
B Fritsch 1.600 36
J V Rooyen 1.600 36
B Daniels < 33% 1.475 38
B Howes < 48% 1.475 38
D Jones 1.375 40
M Jefferson 1.300 41
H Sharp 0.950 42
X O'Halloran 0.475 43
J Leake 0.300 44
H Langford > 21% 0.300 44
M Gruzewski > 27% -0.100 46

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

Edited by Demon Dynasty

 

What stood out most of all with Xavier was his vision and ultra quick release.  Amazing for a first gamer

And that's not the sort of thing you do and then not do.  We've got a lot to look forward to with this lad

On 18/03/2025 at 20:19, GS_1905 said:

Windsor and this bloke off half back will pay big dividends after they have played 50 games together.

Your 50 games late it’s now they start to pay dividends more to come but both won’t be hb flankers all their careers. 


Having so many fwds ranked as they are in Chandler, Roo, Fritta and Jeffo not great. Well I give Jeffo more points and he scored twice as many goals as the other three combined.

Windsor is just so polished. A delight to watch. And cool under pressure. 

No matter where he gets the ball, it's like he's seeing things slow like that scene in the Matrix.

Edited by leave it to deever

About time we took a gippsland lad

I was kind of hoping we took the gippsland trio of tauru, Lindsay and mentha , 2 out of three ain't bad 

We should try and get our hands on more gippsland players like C serong, B humphries , Z duursma, T Papley, J Newcomb 

 
4 hours ago, zoe1617 said:

About time we took a gippsland lad

I was kind of hoping we took the gippsland trio of tauru, Lindsay and mentha , 2 out of three ain't bad 

We should try and get our hands on more gippsland players like C serong, B humphries , Z duursma, T Papley, J Newcomb 

Lindsay looks like a great pick up and I’m feeling good about my sneaky wager I e got on him for the Rising Star award 

But let’s just stick to best available rather than focusing on Gippsland only 😀


I know the discussion around trading our first pick to the Bombers will come up, but even if it is a high pick I’m still comfortable with it. I genuinely believe he’s been the best performed draftee so far the first two rounds. He’s a gun player and probably could’ve been a top 5 pick in a normal draft year.

Edited by DistrACTION Jackson

3 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I know the discussion around trading our first pick to the Bombers will come up, but even if it is a high pick I’m still comfortable with it. I genuinely believe he’s been the best performed draftee so far the first two rounds. He’s a fun player and probably could’ve been a top 5 pick in a normal draft year.

And if Kalani White is any good, we'll get him for a second rounder...

On 20/03/2025 at 11:55, leave it to deever said:

Windsor is just so polished. A delight to watch. And cool under pressure. 

No matter where he gets the ball, it's like he's seeing things slow like that scene in the Matrix.

That’s why he should play in the CENTRE While he won’t solve ALL the problems his pace and kicking and skills will help the connectivity with the forward line, 

On 19/03/2025 at 10:27, FireInTheBennelly said:

I was sold on him very early in the game after he'd put on 2 very clever shepherds to clear a path for a teammate. How many others do we have with those smarts?

The rest of his game was a bonus, an enormous bonus.

I agree , maybe he could teach a few of his teamates because it seems to me like they are not doing enough to protect the ball carrier. 


It’s a testament to him that he looked our most composed and skilful player on the weekend while also having the highest pressure rating

Unfortunately it’s also equally as damning that our 10+ year veterans don’t seem to have the skill and polish of a two gamer 

Anyway, he’s going to be an absolute gun for us, so who cares that the Bombers have our first round pick!

47 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I know the discussion around trading our first pick to the Bombers will come up, but even if it is a high pick I’m still comfortable with it. I genuinely believe he’s been the best performed draftee so far the first two rounds. He’s a gun player and probably could’ve been a top 5 pick in a normal draft year.

agreed he does look a top 5 pick. Classy but Ive also been surprised by his toughness in the clinches. ultra competitive when the ball is in dispute.

It's actually embarrassing to some of our senior players that he looks one of the most composed on the ground for us at the moment...

1 hour ago, 58er said:

That’s why he should play in the CENTRE While he won’t solve ALL the problems his pace and kicking and skills will help the connectivity with the forward line, 

Tx 58er. Although do you think he is strong enough and has the right body type to succeed as a classic in and under ball getter?

I see him more as a wing type player.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 196 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 512 replies