Jump to content

Score reviews

sue
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 

Do Goal Umpires have the power to say to the FU's that there is no review?

  • Quote

    Just a moment folks before I finish this post I'm going now to make a cup of tea...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ......

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Quote
    •  
    22 minutes ago, sue said:

    Typical of the AFL. The goal umpires 'frustrated' by being mocked for the tsunami of reviews, had to lean on the AFL to admit it was an AFL policy.  Why couldn't they announce that upfront.

    https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/goal-umpires-following-afl-directive-in-requesting-more-score-reviews-20240409-p5fihb.html

    Spot on. 

    And if goal umpires have to call for a review if the ball goes near the posts or over the line, then why have goal umpires at all?

    Edited by george_on_the_outer

  • Quote

    1 minute ago, george_on_the_outer said:

    Spot on. 

    And if goal umpires have to call for a review if the ball goes near the posts or over the line, then why have goal umpires at all?

    Didn't Binners call for the rule that even if the ball brushes the post on the way through it's still a goal.

    It would save a lot of time.

  • Quote

    honestly id back the goal umpires in. 

    id do it like cricket. each team gets 1 and 1 ONLY (unless correct) to do a score review. 

    anyone can call it. but youre not going to call it unless youre absolutely sure.

    get it wrong and waste it? you dont get any more. 

     

    Edited by biggestred

  • Quote
    Just now, leave it to deever said:

    Didn't Binners call for the rule that even if the ball brushes the post on the way through it's still a goal.

    It would save a lot of time.

    Yes...one has to think common sense, but no this is the AFL.  And since every goal is reviewed before the next bounce, why do a review on the spot and waste time?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    If they review every goal, then do they review goals that go through the high-diddle-diddle at the height of the top of the posts? Maybe a seagull touched it.

    And, by the way, how did the more senior goal umpires from earlier times in their white coats and hats manage to get is so right without the benefit of modern technology. It must have been good eyesight and good positioning as well as cooperation with the field umpires.

    Who would have guessed?

  • Quote

    I said it at the time and history is bearing it out: the introduction of video technology for umpiring decisions is antithetical to the human nature of sport and does nothing but open a can of worms that need not have been opened.  We’d never use technology to replace a kick for goal, so why would we do it to replace a decision on the accuracy of the goal?

    Edited by Chook

  • Quote

    well what would you expect when the afl monetized the score review

    the score review has an official sponsor.   more reviews, more ads, more money, happy broadcaster

  • Quote

    George said something in the pod I hadn't considered: The score reviews mean that the goal umpires have altered the position that they stand behind the goal when judging. No longer are they directly behind and that makes no sense. 

     

    23 hours ago, biggestred said:

    honestly id back the goal umpires in. 

    id do it like cricket. each team gets 1 and 1 ONLY (unless correct) to do a score review. 

    anyone can call it. but youre not going to call it unless youre absolutely sure.

    get it wrong and waste it? you dont get any more. 

     

    If it were up to me I'd do the same. Back goal umpires in footy, umpires in cricket, refs and linesmen in soccer. I don't care if it's a 10% improvement on correct calls whatever it is currently is not enough for the sake of stopping a game that long and sucking out the joy for fans. 

  • Quote
    On 10/04/2024 at 10:16, Chook said:

    I said it at the time and history is bearing it out: the introduction of video technology for umpiring decisions is antithetical to the human nature of sport and does nothing but open a can of worms that need not have been opened.  We’d never use technology to replace a kick for goal, so why would we do it to replace a decision on the accuracy of the goal?

    I've opened a can of worms. They just sit there, the worms. Hardly the chaos that's been advertised.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Carlton

      I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Carlton

      The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: St. Kilda

      The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 111 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Carlton

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Carlton

      Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Like
      • 22 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Carlton

      A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 316 replies
      Demonland
    View All