Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Moonshadow said:

Yes, but he's a journo nonetheless. It's not fact, just what he thinks.

Hahah ok whatever helps you sleep at night, just let the media be correct when it suits us though right ? 

 
1 minute ago, Jeremy said:

Hahah ok whatever helps you sleep at night, just let the media be correct when it suits us though right ? 

Not exactly, just that it hasn't come from the club, like the 2 x firsts for Petty

9 hours ago, Jeremy said:

It’s not hard to comprehend though is it ? Look at all the picks we gave up to move up TWO spots to get Tholstrup. It’s what we do. Always trying to get as high as possible. Twomey nails the draft every year, he predicts the top 10 every time, he’s not exactly Tom Morris reporting gossip. 

Agree. Hard to comprehend some of the strategies!!! 

 
On 08/08/2024 at 14:21, ChaserJ said:

Not this year’s crop, but if anyone’s interested in having a look at our highest profile NGA kid in next year’s group, Tairon Ah Mu, he’ll be lining up for Vic Country in bottom age trials this weekend (will be streamed):

 

Hi mate, did you (or anyone) happen to catch these games? Keen for a bit of good news and hoping he and Kalani continue to progress along nicely…

19 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

Hi mate, did you (or anyone) happen to catch these games? Keen for a bit of good news and hoping he and Kalani continue to progress along nicely…

https://central.rookieme.com/afl/2024/08/13/scouting-notes-2024-afl-u17s-vic-metro-vs-queensland/

https://central.rookieme.com/afl/2024/08/12/scouting-notes-2024-afl-u17s-vic-country-vs-nsw-act/

Not mentioned, but "tough day to play forward for Vic Metro" and their key forward didn't do anything for 3 quarters is a good sign for Kalani. 

Ah-Mu kicked a goal and set up at least one other. 


1 hour ago, Dee Boys said:

Hi mate, did you (or anyone) happen to catch these games? Keen for a bit of good news and hoping he and Kalani continue to progress along nicely…

Hi mate.

Full game day vision with Kalani White playing CHB.

 

Now back to the serious stuff 

Kid absolutely smashing it in the under 18s  

Jack Ough from Rebels , a country lad now at Ballarat - boards at St.Patrick’s college which is a traditional breeding ground for AFL footballers 

194cms tall mid /  Good pace and inside game as well / not quite Bont but similar size 

only turns 18 in December 

got invite to Nationals combine so clubs are seriously interested 

Really jumping up recruiting lists 

this draft is a good one imv 

47 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Now back to the serious stuff 

Kid absolutely smashing it in the under 18s  

Jack Ough from Rebels , a country lad now at Ballarat - boards at St.Patrick’s college which is a traditional breeding ground for AFL footballers 

194cms tall mid /  Good pace and inside game as well / not quite Bont but similar size 

only turns 18 in December 

got invite to Nationals combine so clubs are seriously interested 

Really jumping up recruiting lists 

this draft is a good one imv 

 

Seems to have done very well in football and schooling giving you have to assume his parents couldn't read or write.

 
8 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Now back to the serious stuff 

Kid absolutely smashing it in the under 18s  

Jack Ough from Rebels , a country lad now at Ballarat - boards at St.Patrick’s college which is a traditional breeding ground for AFL footballers 

194cms tall mid /  Good pace and inside game as well / not quite Bont but similar size 

only turns 18 in December 

got invite to Nationals combine so clubs are seriously interested 

Really jumping up recruiting lists 

this draft is a good one imv 

 

Reminds me a bit of Blake Howes but a fraction taller 

Not sure he has the speed and elite disposal that we need but one to consider no doubt 

10 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Hi mate.

Full game day vision with Kalani White playing CHB.

 

I was there, it was more a full back role to be honest. Lining up on Vic M key forward. 
Moves like his old man, possesses a big leap. Reminded me of Darcy Moore. Spoiled a few contests, got lost a bit once or twice by his opponent. Was on and off the ground every quarter. 


5 minutes ago, H_T said:

I was there, it was more a full back role to be honest. Lining up on Vic M key forward. 
Moves like his old man, possesses a big leap. Reminded me of Darcy Moore. Spoiled a few contests, got lost a bit once or twice by his opponent. Was on and off the ground every quarter. 

Yeah to be honest I'm not a fan of him playing down back. The vision i've seen him play he's looked okay and does tend to get lost.

I want to see him more as that forward ruck role that I saw back when he was playing in the under 15's championships up here in Lavington few years back.

His athletic ability and movement in the ruck and especially up forward reminded me a lot of Sam Darcy. 

Just my opinion, but I really do think he's wasted down back.

8 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yeah to be honest I'm not a fan of him playing down back. The vision i've seen him play he's looked okay and does tend to get lost.

I want to see him more as that forward ruck role that I saw back when he was playing in the under 15's championships up here in Lavington few years back.

His athletic ability and movement in the ruck and especially up forward reminded me a lot of Sam Darcy. 

Just my opinion, but I really do think he's wasted down back.

Could just be part of his development and they may look to move him forward next year to increase his profile.

1. Langford - I think the athleticism doubts are overblown and he's so good around stoppages and with a marking outside game and penetrating boot
2. O'Sullivan - pure class
3. Ashcroft 
4. Lalor - I'd go this high on him, just so explosive
5. Draper -good speed, hands and vision
6. Jagga - he's rock solid but a bit meh
 

Not a huge fan of Smillie and not sure where the talls fit in just yet. 


1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Cals top 30 updated 

Harvey Langford at 3

Sam Lalor at 9 👏👏👏

Xavier Lindsay at 16 bargain 

Christian Moraes at 25 bargain 

Tom Gross at 26 bargain 

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1195410
 

Lindsay could go inside 10. His game reminds me of Josh Kelly.

Cooper Hynes could push up a bit as well.

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Cals top 30 updated 

Harvey Langford at 3

Sam Lalor at 9 👏👏👏

Xavier Lindsay at 16 bargain 

Christian Moraes at 25 bargain 

Tom Gross at 26 bargain 

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1195410
 

Shows the importance of getting a good pick for Nibbler 

If we could get a Langford or Lalor with our first pick, and then a Xavier Lindsay, Christian Moraes or Tom Gross with what we get for Nibbler, we could do quite well for ourselves

Still going to miss him though 😢 

58 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

1. Langford - I think the athleticism doubts are overblown and he's so good around stoppages and with a marking outside game and penetrating boot
2. O'Sullivan - pure class
3. Ashcroft 
4. Lalor - I'd go this high on him, just so explosive
5. Draper -good speed, hands and vision
6. Jagga - he's rock solid but a bit meh
 

Not a huge fan of Smillie and not sure where the talls fit in just yet. 

I don't know if it's just his number 5, but O'Sullivan reminds me of a less explosive Trac, but still nimble with good vision and smarts. I agree, I'd definitely have Langford ahead of him.

I'd be happy with either Langford or Lalor. Wouldn't be disappointed with Draper either. If we could somehow nab two of these guys, particularly the first two, Lalor could play forward, and Langford at half back and in the mid rotation.

I want Houston as well, so we're likely to swallow our future first with a trade for him, but if we can use Nibbler and a future second for Houston, and trade our future first into this year's first round, getting Langford and Lalor would mean our midfield under 22 would be set for the next decade, with Rivers, McVee and Windsor.

It'd then just be about filling holes in that 25-27 list demo over the next 2-3 years.

Edited by Binmans PA

7 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

I don't know if it's just his number 5, but O'Sullivan reminds me of a less explosive Trac, but still nimble with good vision and smarts. I agree, I'd definitely have Langford ahead of him.

I'd be happy with either Langford or Lalor. Wouldn't be disappointed with Draper either. If we could somehow nab two of these guys, particularly the first two, Lalor could play forward, and Langford at half back and in the mid rotation.

I want Houston as well, so we're likely to swallow our future first with a trade for him, but if we can use Nibbler and a future second for Houston, and trade our future first into this year's first round, getting Langford and Lalor would mean our midfield under 22 would be set for the next decade, with Rivers, McVee and Windsor.

It'd then just be about filling holes in that 25-27 list demo over the next 2-3 years.

I think Nibbler and a future second is wildly optimistic for Houston. Nibbler and a 2025 first sounds spot on.

Even if they allow trading 2026 picks I can’t see us getting back in to the first round with picks alone. It’s too far off for teams to want that pick, unless they’re a deep rebuild side somehow ending up with 15-20 and gambling that we’ll be awful. 

I suspect it will take another player to get in to the first round again, which may well happen. But wait and see on that.

I’m pretty confident that barring any off field concerns or injuries that Langford goes top 5. Lalor has a wide draft range that generally will be influenced by interviews and 2km time I think given the production just hasn’t been there for a variety of reasons.

O’Sullivan’s such a strange one. About as well rounded as a medium sized midfielder gets - run, speed, sharp skills, overhead marking, balance, kicks goals. Everything you’d want in a 182cm midfielder. Exactly the kind of midfielder we need to balance our midfield.

Comes in to the year the presumptive number 1 pick then just hasn’t had the year due to injury. But he reminds me a lot of a young Trent Cotchin and I wonder if the Tigers will ultimately think the same. If he just has 2 or 3 dominant Coates league games he’ll go back to pick 1, but if can’t put anything on tape he’s suddenly a bit theoretical.

3 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

I think Nibbler and a future second is wildly optimistic for Houston. Nibbler and a 2025 first sounds spot on.

Even if they allow trading 2026 picks I can’t see us getting back in to the first round with picks alone. It’s too far off for teams to want that pick, unless they’re a deep rebuild side somehow ending up with 15-20 and gambling that we’ll be awful. 

I suspect it will take another player to get in to the first round again, which may well happen. But wait and see on that.

I’m pretty confident that barring any off field concerns or injuries that Langford goes top 5. Lalor has a wide draft range that generally will be influenced by interviews and 2km time I think given the production just hasn’t been there for a variety of reasons.

O’Sullivan’s such a strange one. About as well rounded as a medium sized midfielder gets - run, speed, sharp skills, overhead marking, balance, kicks goals. Everything you’d want in a 182cm midfielder. Exactly the kind of midfielder we need to balance our midfield.

Comes in to the year the presumptive number 1 pick then just hasn’t had the year due to injury. But he reminds me a lot of a young Trent Cotchin and I wonder if the Tigers will ultimately think the same. If he just has 2 or 3 dominant Coates league games he’ll go back to pick 1, but if can’t put anything on tape he’s suddenly a bit theoretical.

I agree, it's more likely it'll take trading one of our players to get another pick in the top 10.


Hamish Davis would have similar endurance and power running capabilities to Nibbler. Some scoreboard impact and fairly new to midfield role. Moving up the board with the backend of his season 

Keep first and I think we get one of Draper, Reid, Lalor or Langford 

 

Can definitely see the resemblance to Cotchin with O’Sullivan @DeeSpencer. To all of the traits you’ve listed I’d add defensive running. His two way running is v good.

DEES NEED TO KEEP FIRST ROUND PICK (probably around pick 5 or 6 now) AND GET ONE OF EITHER

XAVIER LINDSAY

HARVEY LANGFORD

SAM LALOR

 
43 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

DEES NEED TO KEEP FIRST ROUND PICK (probably around pick 5 or 6 now) AND GET ONE OF EITHER

XAVIER LINDSAY

HARVEY LANGFORD

SAM LALOR

You not a fan of Murphy Reid SONM?

5 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

You not a fan of Murphy Reid SONM?

 

my phantom draft from earlier today 

Phantom draft update : 

1 Finn O'Sullivan - Oakleigh

2. ***Brisbane match bid. Levi Ashcroft Father son.

3. Jagga Smith - Oakleigh

4. Luke Trainor - Sandringham 
5. Josh Smillie - Eastern

6. Sid Draper - Sth Adel 

7.***Suns match bid - Leonardo Lombard (Academy )
8. Harvey Langford - Dandenong
9. Sam Lalor- GWV

10. Xavier Lindsay - Gippsland
11. Murphy Reid - Sandringham


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 183 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies