Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

2020 Player Reviews: #46 Austin Bradtke

Category B rookie with a junior basketball background who was limited to local scratch matches early and then hub games. Based on that, there’s little to go on for an assessment of his progress. However, in light of Braydon Preuss’ imminent departure, it’s likely that he will remain on the list for further development in 2021.

Date of Birth: 27 May 2000

Height: 204cm

Weight: 91kg

Games MFC 2020: 0

Career Total: 0

Goals MFC 2020: 0

Career Total: 0

 

He's been around a few years now - is there any indication that he is capable of becoming an AFL player?

I doubt that we are doing him any favours keeping him at the club if we can't guarantee him significant time as number one ruckman at Casey next year. He would be better developing in an environment where he can get the game time he needs.

IIRC, there were indications (from Demonland track- watchers and Casey-watchers) that he was progressing quite well in the second half of 2019, but there's no way of knowing what (if any) progress he has made this year.  A 'bean-pole' Category B Rookie who will obviously take time to develop, but only Club insiders would know if he's worth persevering with.

 

Did a few nice things against North in that scratch match at Arden St. That was up against Xerri who played a few games as a back up for North this year and is physical and not the worst.

Who knows what he did after that. Not a name that got any publicity for scratch match performances. 

45 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Did a few nice things against North in that scratch match at Arden St. That was up against Xerri who played a few games as a back up for North this year and is physical and not the worst.

Who knows what he did after that. Not a name that got any publicity for scratch match performances. 

I have seen him a few times for Casey obviously not this year. Does not have it from what I have seen. I have seen nothing to suggest he will make a reasonable VFL ruckman.


31 minutes ago, old dee said:

I have seen him a few times for Casey obviously not this year. Does not have it from what I have seen. I have seen nothing to suggest he will make a reasonable VFL ruckman.

You saw his first few games of senior footy after 1 preseason having not played the game for years. How far off the standard he was doesn’t really matter, it’s the rate of improvement that does. I hope the club can provide some years in review stuff once they finalise the list. Clearly it won’t be negative on players we end up keeping but some vision and reflections would be appreciated. 

2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

You saw his first few games of senior footy after 1 preseason having not played the game for years. How far off the standard he was doesn’t really matter, it’s the rate of improvement that does. I hope the club can provide some years in review stuff once they finalise the list. Clearly it won’t be negative on players we end up keeping but some vision and reflections would be appreciated. 

His first year was 2018, last year was his second. I gave  my opinion based on 2019 season. Are we not allowed to give an opinion now if it is negative?

I saw him in the pre season and he has all the athletic ability to succeed. But is very raw and needs gym work and footy IQ. Needs games so 2020 meant he has been stuck in his development.  Another Cat B rookie year hopefully in 21

 
4 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

I saw him in the pre season and he has all the athletic ability to succeed. But is very raw and needs gym work and footy IQ. Needs games so 2020 meant he has been stuck in his development.  Another Cat B rookie year hopefully in 21

Will there big such a thing?


Just now, spirit of norm smith said:

It’s looking 40/60 right now imv but ????

Yes what we don't know is astounding. 

i wish we'd just get rucks from other clubs/vfl/wafl.. it seems as though the club are against this? it seems more likely than a cat b rookie. surely we can find some flashy winger/FF with no tank whatsoever to fill that spot next time?

I've watched him play about 4-5 times and have posted each time. In the first couple of games I watched (spread over the first year) he got utterly rag-dolled and I expected that given his size, weight and absence from the game in his teenage years. I was looking for positives in his game and they were that he is by far the best kick of all the rucks at the time - probably akin to Tim English for kicking. The other thing was he appeared very clean below his knees for a giant stick insect and his dish offs were pretty slick.  In one game he was pushed off the ball so easily it was almost comical. He then received instructions to jump over the other ruckman, which he did comfortably and evened up the score with whoever it was. He also never gave up - important!

I confess, I'm still none the wiser on the ruck craft until he can get more size on him and experience (NB Max was a very ordinary ruckman until he worked out how to use his height to advantage and took the game a bit more seriously), but Bradtke looked much improved earlier this year and I'm hopeful that if the club can afford to hold onto him, while he develops, he could be a very decent player. Again, the closest I can think of as a comparison is Tim English. Luke Jackson might change this formula though. He has already leapt ahead given his many assets, but I could see a Jackson / Bradtke combo being formidable when Max retires. 

4 hours ago, old dee said:

I have seen him a few times for Casey obviously not this year. Does not have it from what I have seen. I have seen nothing to suggest he will make a reasonable VFL ruckman.

definitely has a long way to go from the few times I have watched him.

was only a relieving ruck at Casey in 2019 given they played Buxton when Preuss was not playing.

You have to wonder what benefit he got from the hub in terms of development

1 hour ago, old dee said:

His first year was 2018, last year was his second. I gave  my opinion based on 2019 season. Are we not allowed to give an opinion now if it is negative?

He signed on in mid 2018 but wasn't allowed to start official training in November like any other draft pick from that year. Hence what you were seeing was his first games of senior footy and some of his first games in over 3 years. I said the club wouldn't be negative if he stayed on the list. You can be as negative as you like, just be aware of what you were watching.

Quote

With Bradtke not eligible to be signed until the end of a three-year registration process, it means the earliest he can officially join the Demons’ list is November,

“It’s been two and a half years, so he can’t do anything now until the end of this junior football season,” Mark said.

“We’re allowed to go have a kick down at the park that’s all he can do, he’s still playing basketball, working out and lifting weights, but he’s not playing footy.

 


cat b will definitely be staying around, possibly shrunk from 2 spots to 1 tho, too successful with the irish guys, cox, keath, blic off the top of my head and also is outside the TPP so doesn't get affected by that, surprised he hasnt signed on yet but i guess they'll wait and do a big group announcement in the next wave and just slide him in as it's not the most exciting news. considering the year it was there's no reason to scratch him off and replace him in the B spot as theres been no alternatives to scout out

15 hours ago, Rocky said:

i wish we'd just get rucks from other clubs/vfl/wafl.. it seems as though the club are against this? it seems more likely than a cat b rookie. surely we can find some flashy winger/FF with no tank whatsoever to fill that spot next time?

We have a phenomenal track record of developing Ruckmen, why would we want to change that and pick up another team's failure... ala, Preuss. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies