Jump to content

Featured Replies

Obviously need to rest players. Seriously if we can't beat the Crows with a few players being rested we are worse than I think we are.

North and Collingwood are the tests for those who think there is still life in this season.

 
1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

 

He loves the club, and being captain at a time when it is under fire make it no surprise really he's declared himself fit to play. Doesn't mean he is though. It's understandable from Max's point of view, but you're right OD, in the context of who we play as well as our current clearance/midfield connection issues I hope he's not risking himself.

We do need to win this game. 
So i just hope the big man can contribute in the way we need him to

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

We do need to win this game. 
So i just hope the big man can contribute in the way we need him to

Absolutely we do. I just think we could do that without Gawn tbh.

 

 
33 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

ethan trollblay?

Yep that’s me... Anyway, glad to see Gawn isn’t missing out. If I hear any injury news I’ll be sure to post it straight away without any verification. I’m sure Max would loved to have read he was missing two games. Toot toot. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

5 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

He loves the club, and being captain at a time when it is under fire make it no surprise really he's declared himself fit to play. Doesn't mean he is though. It's understandable from Max's point of view, but you're right OD, in the context of who we play as well as our current clearance/midfield connection issues I hope he's not risking himself.

Pity we don't have another dozen to match him.


52 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

I find this comment attributed to him, troubling  "He said the Demons knew what they did wrong but were still trying to discover the reason for it".

This is like when you're looking for your sunglasses and eventually someone says "they're on your head!"

No wonder Goodwin can't find the problem.

I'm still skeptical . If he is in any doubt I would not risk him. I hope he is right but until I see him run out and play unhindered I will remain skeptical.

3 minutes ago, picket fence said:

I'm still skeptical . If he is in any doubt I would not risk him. I hope he is right but until I see him run out and play unhindered I will remain skeptical.

This is perfect round to rest him. There is never going to be a better  round when we should be able win without him. 

 
3 hours ago, old dee said:

Short break did not seem to worry port last night.

Yes and no. 

Yes because their fatigue was evident throughout the game particularly in the first half.

Dogs do a Melbourne and wasted so much of their dominance in the first half and last quarter. Bruce was tmac like and they kept going to him. 

Only a dees supporter could understand how they were only 3 points up at half time. It barely went inside the port 50 in the second quarter.

Make no mistake the doggies should have won.

Which is where the no comes in. Port were mentally tough enough to hang in the match in the first half and last quarter. And were able to raise an effort in in the third. More mentally than physically. It won them the game I couldn't help but be impressed. I thought they were a bit flakey.

By the by had a good win on the doggies at the line. The difference in gaps between games will play a big role in the next two weeks.

19 minutes ago, binman said:

Yes and no. 

Yes because their fatigue was evident throughout the game particularly in the first half.

Dogs do a Melbourne and wasted so much of their dominance in the first half and last quarter. Bruce was tmac like and they kept going to him. 

Only a dees supporter could understand how they were only 3 points up at half time. It barely went inside the port 50 in the second quarter.

Make no mistake the doggies should have won.

Which is where the no comes in. Port were mentally tough enough to hang in the match in the first half and last quarter. And were able to raise an effort in in the third. More mentally than physically. It won them the game I couldn't help but be impressed. I thought they were a bit flakey.

By the by had a good win on the doggies at the line. The difference in gaps between games will play a big role in the next two weeks.

But they won, the dogs didn't. They found a way in spite of being tired. We couldn't manage to be in the game at any point. Surely that is the difference. I think we are over estimating the ability of a large number of our team. 


26 minutes ago, old dee said:

But they won, the dogs didn't. They found a way in spite of being tired. We couldn't manage to be in the game at any point. Surely that is the difference. I think we are over estimating the ability of a large number of our team. 

Did you stop reading half way through my post OD. That's exactly what i meant by:

'Make no mistake the doggies should have won.

Which is where the no comes in. Port were mentally tough enough to hang in the match in the first half and last quarter. And were able to raise an effort in in the third. More mentally than physically. It won them the game I couldn't help but be impressed. I thought they were a bit flakey.' 

30 minutes ago, binman said:

Did you stop reading half way through my post OD. That's exactly what i meant by:

'Make no mistake the doggies should have won.

Which is where the no comes in. Port were mentally tough enough to hang in the match in the first half and last quarter. And were able to raise an effort in in the third. More mentally than physically. It won them the game I couldn't help but be impressed. I thought they were a bit flakey.' 

I was making the agreeing point that Port won and like us the dogs didn't. I have no idea why  but this has been our trade mark for decades. Nothing to do your comments but why 3 years ago when we, lions and port where down and could not beat time with a stick are we still in that position but the other two are going gang busters at the top of the comp? 

 

36 minutes ago, binman said:

Did you stop reading half way through my post OD. That's exactly what i meant by:

'Make no mistake the doggies should have won.

Which is where the no comes in. Port were mentally tough enough to hang in the match in the first half and last quarter. And were able to raise an effort in in the third. More mentally than physically. It won them the game I couldn't help but be impressed. I thought they were a bit flakey.' 

Port weren’t playing the top team on the ladder but rather a middle of the road team. That’s a big difference.

1 minute ago, Elwood 3184 said:

Port weren’t playing the top team on the ladder but rather a middle of the road team. That’s a big difference.

So if was us playing the dogs would we have won?

2 minutes ago, old dee said:

So if was us playing the dogs would we have won?

Who knows but the Dogs were playing off an extra day’s break which is a significant factor. 


Give Maxie a break? Sure.

OR IF WE PLAY HIM I'd be playing him forward with Jacko in the 'ruck'.

Whoever, really at this stage, because we're not getting much advantage playing to Max's dominance.

Play that hack Jones in the ruck - since he's been picked in front of Rivers. !!!!!

Jonesy plays like a bloody fifty year old - oh, wait - he is, isn't he?

And say what you like about  Alex Scapegoat-Bullen - does kick goals.

On 8/3/2020 at 11:57 AM, Lord Nev said:

2 games with a lat injury.

 

On 8/4/2020 at 10:10 AM, Ethan Tremblay said:

Hang on. I thought a certain poster had inside info and he was going to miss two games? Someone forgot to tell Gawny. 

 

On 8/4/2020 at 11:05 AM, Ethan Tremblay said:

Yep that’s me... Anyway, glad to see Gawn isn’t missing out. If I hear any injury news I’ll be sure to post it straight away without any verification. I’m sure Max would loved to have read he was missing two games. Toot toot. 

Sounds like someone finally told Max hey?

#NevTheNewsbreaker

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 98 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 31 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies
  • VOTES: Port Adelaide

    Max Gawn has an insurmountable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzy Pickett. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies