Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

 My List Appraisal 

A+ Champion All Australian

A  Consistent Good player 

A- Gets a game at any club

B+ Shows potential could rise to greatness or on the slide.

B - Average

B-  On thin ice

C+ - Delistable

C- Vfl quality only

 

MAY A-

JONES B-

SALEM B+

HARMES B+

PETRACCA B+

Viney B

BRAYSHAW B+

OLIVER A

GAWN A

LEVER B

FROST B

HIBBERD B

FRITZ B+

TMAC A-

WEIDERMAN B-

MELKSHAM B

JETTA B

HUNT B-

BAKER C

Lewis B

LOCKHART C+

OMAC C+

HANNAN B

TSMITH B-

JSmith B

KK B

JKH B-

PETTY B

PRUESS C

GARLETT C+

KEILTY C

AVB B

Spargo C+

Stretch B-

CWagner C+

JWagner B-

ANB B-

Hore B

Dunkley C+



 

 

Hard on Dunkley

4 games, 18 years old, no pre season

I believe he'll be just as good as his bro (and it took him 4 or 5 years) to reach his current level

 
13 minutes ago, shorty said:

PETRACCA B+

Get's a game at any club...A- to A

Personally, I have sat back this year and not been overly critical of MFC. Strange as the year has been less than acceptable. 

I do think last years rise and sudden fall was too much for a few players and they did not adjust to 2019.

With Mission gone and Burgess in, I personally think that will make a huge difference. The extended break and early start to preseason will be gold. A few coaching changes and new outlook will be defining. 

What will be crucial, is how we go about the draft and trade period. Pick 2/3 should not be traded. There kids come in and can play like they have for 5 years. Only way it could be trade is if we get an amazing player and a early second round back.

I still think sparrow will be a jet and it is important we realise weeds is still young and will be a gun.

 


Good list of players just not playing good smart football. I think fritch and T McDonald if fitter can provide a reasonable forwardline. Need a small forward, medium marking forward and some outside speed.

Pass mark (only taking into account games played):

Gawn

Oliver

Petracca

Harmes 

Salem

Hore

May

Fritz* (*when played forward) 

  • Author
31 minutes ago, Dirts said:

Personally, I have sat back this year and not been overly critical of MFC. Strange as the year has been less than acceptable. 

I do think last years rise and sudden fall was too much for a few players and they did not adjust to 2019.

With Mission gone and Burgess in, I personally think that will make a hets  get Use back to uge difference. The extended break and early start to preseason will be gold. A few coaching changes and new outlook will be defining. 

What will be crucial, is how we go about the draft and trade period. Pick 2/3 should not be traded. There kids come in and can play like they have for 5 years. Only way it could be trade is if we get an amazing player and a early second round back.

I still think sparrow will be a jet and it is important we realise weeds is still young and will be a gun.

 

Let's get YZE back

Add Butler , J Thomas, Langdon , Crocker and J Martin.

Keep pick 2

.

 

Darren Burgess has an almost blank canvas to work from

i hope he is really looking forward to this challenge 


bunch of over hyped players thinking their better than what they are...

reckon not playing as a team rather as individuals

7 hours ago, shorty said:

 My List Appraisal 

A+ Champion All Australian

A  Consistent Good player 

A- Gets a game at any club

B+ Shows potential could rise to greatness or on the slide.

B - Average

B-  On thin ice

C+ - Delistable

C- Vfl quality only

 

MAY A-

JONES B-

SALEM B+

HARMES B+

PETRACCA B+

Viney B

BRAYSHAW B+

OLIVER A

GAWN A

LEVER B

FROST B

HIBBERD B

FRITZ B+

TMAC A-

WEIDERMAN B-

MELKSHAM B

JETTA B

HUNT B-

BAKER C

Lewis B

LOCKHART C+

OMAC C+

HANNAN B

TSMITH B-

JSmith B

KK B

JKH B-

PETTY B

PRUESS C

GARLETT C+

KEILTY C

AVB B

Spargo C+

Stretch B-

CWagner C+

JWagner B-

ANB B-

Hore B

Dunkley C+



 

this season? all should get a F for failures!

Edited by Demonsone

9 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Darren Burgess has an almost blank canvas to work from

i hope he is really looking forward to this challenge 

What do we spend our time on? Physical fitness or foot skills in the preseason? You would think you could do both but I am not sure these days as they will spend 3 sessions a week for 90 minutes  or so at Goschs paddock testing their footy skills and running laps. Is that enough to make a difference to both their skills and ability to run out a game? Not sure given the lack of skills we are dealing with. 

Edited by Earl Hood

Just now, Earl Hood said:

What do we spend our time on? Physical fitness or foot skills in the preseason? You would think you could do both but I am not sure these days as they will spend 3 sessions a week for 90 minutes  or so at Goschs paddock testing their footy skills and running laps. Is that enough to make a difference to both their skills and ability to run out a game? 

I have no idea Hood. But we have to rewrite the Template for training methods if it needs to be done. 

I am hoping this is similar to John Kennedy in the late 50’s

We need Physical Fitness, Mental Strength, hand and foot skills all to improve massively. And then hopefully improve injury management legally!!

it has to be completely revamped, membership will demand it

13 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I have no idea Hood. But we have to rewrite the Template for training methods if it needs to be done. 

I am hoping this is similar to John Kennedy in the late 50’s

We need Physical Fitness, Mental Strength, hand and foot skills all to improve massively. And then hopefully improve injury management legally!!

it has to be completely revamped, membership will demand it

I agree in theory it should be possible to work on all these areas as they are 6 day a week professionals but I always wonder what they do with their time in the 4 or 5 months of the preseason. At best you see them 2 or 3 times a week out on the field for one or two hours, what are they doing the rest of the time? I don’t know but I hope it is not spent studying a game plan that hasn’t been working.

And from watching training this year it is apparent to me that they do not play how they train anyway. When training we move the ball quickly often switching play to use the full width of the ground always looking for a forward lead up. 

Our training drills have zero emphasis on practicing small forward crumbing skills because our drills have us delivering the ball to a presenting key forward who will often take the mark. Come game day we are lobbing balls high to a contest that gets brought to ground but we have no small forwards positioned to take advantage  but instead the opposition is there ready to run the ball out at high speed to their advantage. So the training drills we do are of limited use if we can’t replicate it on game day with success. 

Let’s hope for a big change out in assistant coaching resources for next year. 


Just now, Earl Hood said:

I agree in theory it should be possible to work on all these areas as they are 6 day a week professionals but I always wonder what they do with their time in the 4 or 5 months of the preseason. At best you see them 2 or 3 times a week out on the field for one or two hours, what are they doing the rest of the time? I don’t know but I hope it is not spent studying a game plan that hasn’t been working.

And from watching training this year it is apparent to me that they do not play how they train anyway. When training we move the ball quickly often switching play to use the full width of the ground always looking for a forward lead up. 

Our training drills have zero emphasis on practicing small forward crumbing skills because our drills have us delivering the ball to a presenting key forward who will often take the mark. Come game day we are lobbing balls high to a contest that gets brought to ground but we have no small forwards positioned to take advantage  but instead the opposition is there ready to run the ball out at high speed to their advantage. So the training drills we do are of limited use if we can’t replicate it on game day with success. 

Let’s hope for a big change out in assistant coaching resources for next year. 

I agree. I don’t understand the workings of modern training. But whatever it is, it isn’t working. 

I hope this summer is exciting 

You need something like an NA (not assessable) category for players like Dunkley and a couple of others ( maybe Lockhart) until they’ve played more than a few games. C+ Delistable is far too harsh!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 191 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 535 replies