Jump to content

Featured Replies

Hogan for pick 5, 23, 30.

Pick 5 for May and Kolodjashnij.

We go in with picks 23, 30, 36, 46, 54.

62 and 65 will be used to get us Bedford.

 

I don't want Jess to leave, but it is what it is.

I think We will get pick 5 & i hope some more picks from this deal

Pick 5 to Gc for  may & KK and maybe another player

Then we use the rest of the picks for the draft in November

In the morning we give a late but good pick (maybe 46) for KK. Freo are spooked.

Freo concede they must give Neale to Brisbane for 5. Now Freo are in a total mess.

Freo give 5 and next years 1st for Hogan.

GC take the Freo 2019 first for May.

On draft night we swap 5 to Adelaide for 8 & 14.

Even if this happens I’d prefer Hogan to stay.

 
2 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Hogan for pick 5, 23, 30.

Pick 5 for May and Kolodjashnij.

We go in with picks 23, 30, 36, 46, 54, 62 and 65

 

 

Freo give us 5 and 30 and some swapsies to make it appear like they had a big win

The picks however are/or will be worth more than 5 and 23 in a points-based system.

Regardless, everyone is up in arms. 

We give 5 and 30 to GC for May and KK (and maybe another seemingly irrelevant swapsies).

Everyone's arms are now flapping at full steam, threatening a widespread meltdown. 

AFL commentators and pundits say stupid stuff.  

Some posters on Demonland patiently explain the benefits of the trade while others don't bother. 


Bell turns up with his chest puffed out, makes ridiculous demands for Neale tells Melbourne his got a late 1st rounder and some pocket lint for Hogan. Finally does the Neale deal, plays Adelaide and Port against each other for pick 5 pick swaps, finally does a deal with Adelaide. Comes to Mahoney is all his smugness. Mahoney says No deal. Hogan will go to West coast next year, with a premiership under his belt.

https://goo.gl/images/SBQoQM

Edited by deeology

Neale to Brisbane for pick 5

Hogan to Freo for pick 5 and 23

Pick 5 and 36 to GCS for May and pick 19

Pick 46 to GCS for KK

 

We get May, KK and picks 19 and 23 - along with picks 54, 62 and 65 (which may be used in other trades or upgrades)

We give Hogan, pick 36 and pick 46

 

Edited by TheCurseisBroken

Ed Langdon worked into the Hogan and pick 5+ deal.

Edited by Left Field

 

I predict the trade period will finish at exactly 2030 this evening 

I predict they wont do a 2 hour TV finale next season.

Everyone is taking about how fake and manufactured this whole thing is.  It is backfiring spectacularly for the AFL, who truly believe the public are idiots.


49 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

I predict they wont do a 2 hour TV finale next season.

Everyone is taking about how fake and manufactured this whole thing is.  It is backfiring spectacularly for the AFL, who truly believe the public are idiots.

Hey Petraccattack - did I get your Kade Kolodjashnij quiz right? I'm applying for a job tomorrow and need to know if I can tell them of my Mensa-level IQ.  

Hogan is gone. We will get May and Kolodjashnij in return and that is it. Mahoney has the backbone of a sea gooseberry when it comes to trade week.

If they are sensible they will try to get something for Frost to at get us another pick in the 30-40 range.

17 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Hey Petraccattack - did I get your Kade Kolodjashnij quiz right? I'm applying for a job tomorrow and need to know if I can tell them of my Mensa-level IQ.  

What was your answer?

As soon as the trade becomes official I will reveal all.

Lols. This place is going to be a cracker to read later. 

It'll be the same nancies who complained about getting Melksham, Hibbo, trading Watts, Frawley, etc etc etc.

We'll win a flag in the next 5 years if we land May. 

Bank it. 

 

Edited by stevethemanjordan

5 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Lols. This place is going to be a cracker to read later. 

 

 

 

Could be worth getting way unders just to see the meltdowns.   What a show that would be.

 

Anyways, my dream scenario which wont happen but fun to think about

In -     Steven May,  Ed Langdon, pick 23,  Kade Kodoalshnikj (spelling lol)

Out -   Jesse Hogan, 2nd rounder, 3rd rounder


I predict that if we should secure his services, Kolodjashnij will become the most commonly mis-spelt name on Demonland. And that will be an achievement following on from the sometimes absurdly simple (for example, Mitch Clark/Clarke) to the understandable...where are the capitalised letters in vandenBerg's name?

9 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I predict that if we should secure his services, Kolodjashnij will become the most commonly mis-spelt name on Demonland. And that will be an achievement following on from the sometimes absurdly simple (for example, Mitch Clark/Clarke) to the understandable...where are the capitalised letters in vandenBerg's name?

Or Hibbard instead of Hibberd 

Where is my prize I got closest to the pin didn't I?

On 10/17/2018 at 4:26 AM, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I predict that if we should secure his services, Kolodjashnij will become the most commonly mis-spelt name on Demonland. And that will be an achievement following on from the sometimes absurdly simple (for example, Mitch Clark/Clarke) to the understandable...where are the capitalised letters in vandenBerg's name?

Good point. Maybe KJJ..? :)

 

Edited by Wadda We Sing


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies