Jump to content

Jordan Lewis is absolutely cooked, never pick him again


DeeSpencer

Lewis = cooked  

332 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

SO you want leg speed but your potential trades include 3 guys with genuine leg speed. I’m confused. 

  Stop being confused.

I want players that will take us forward,  who have footy brains along with some speed.  Brains first,  along with some speed.

 

You cannot see that, without some thought...  or are you just going on spontaneous impression,  otherwise know as (knee jerk reaction).?

So to make changes...  we have to weed out the ones who will not take us forward.  List places and maybe gain some picks

 

Hibbo 29+ Yrs, might bring a pick

Garlett 29+ Yrs, might bring a pick

Frost, might bring a pick

Hunt, might bring a pick

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Supermercado said:

He can guide them in giving away petulant free kicks behind play.

That is just MfcSS silliness.

We don't have anyone with the smarts of the Hawks premierships and methods and mental skills.  Other than Lew.

We are structurally deficient...  that's not Lewis's fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You stick him on a wing after missing a month of footy, you get your just desserts.

It was madness sticking him there in the first place.  In the twilight of his career, we should have known better.  We needed him across half back.

Plus, they should have dropped Spargo, not Stretch.  He was the perfect player for us, at the moment, who can provide at least a little more pace and stamina running up and down the MCG wings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

You stick him on a wing after missing a month of footy, you get your just desserts.

It was madness sticking him there in the first place.  In the twilight of his career, we should have known better.  We needed him across half back.

Plus, they should have dropped Spargo, not Stretch.  He was the perfect player for us, at the moment, who can provide at least a little more pace and stamina running up and down the MCG wings.

The many of us who have said exactly that obviously know nothing about footy, because the experts we pay a fortune to for running our team did exactly that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

The many of us who have said exactly that obviously know nothing about footy, because the experts we pay a fortune to for running our team did exactly that.

You would love to know the reasoning, though.  Clearly Goody has something in mind, only we don't know what that is.  I can't see someone, who is clearly an intelligent coach, just sticking an old fella on a wing and hoping for the best.  I know that is what it looks like, but deep down we know that just isn't the case.

On the flip side, I think it's pretty evident that, whatever the plan was, they got it wrong and Lewis had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever.  I'd be very, very surprised to see him line up on a wing on Wednesday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


12 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Hard to put any faith in a coach who plays his two slowest and oldest players on the wings of the MCG against any team, let alone and quick one. 

What possible logic is behind this coaching move?

To slow, or stop the Opps' attacks... trying to lock the ball in our half.

It's failing badly.  We do not have the Cattle at our disposal to play our gamestyle.

Edited by DV8
  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ugottobekidding said:

Is our game style even relevent these days...

It doesn't look like it does it.

But it did in a couple of Qtr's of footy, this season, so far.

 

The point is,  we don't really Know how much its in need of tweaking... Because we have so Many of our BEST players out, or playing hurt.  So its really difficult to See.

 

Should we chuck out "the Baby and the Bathwater"... as it where,  Or just the Bathwater.  

It's so dirty, we cannot see the depth of the problem.

So where do we cut to...  or start from ?

Edited by DV8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ugottobekidding said:

like the look of noah anderson

I haven't kept up with the kids for 4 or 5 years. and I don't know anything of this years bunch, at this time.

 

But I have been calling for us to recruit small forward rover types,  and midfield running types over at least the past 4 National Drafts.

Names of Ainsworth, Higgins, DeGoey, Stephenson, I was unsure of Petruccelle but he was an interest.  but more out and out speed at that time.

 

Back a few years prior to that,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  from that Weideman draft,  I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

I really wanted us to make sure we got Weideman... who I'll back all the way for us.  But i was hoping we could also pickup a Grundy as well,  Via some wheeling and dealing.

Sadly that did not happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

You stick him on a wing after missing a month of footy, you get your just desserts.

It was madness sticking him there in the first place.  In the twilight of his career, we should have known better.  We needed him across half back.

Plus, they should have dropped Spargo, not Stretch.  He was the perfect player for us, at the moment, who can provide at least a little more pace and stamina running up and down the MCG wings.

So damn true. He has a specific role down back which he usually does quite well.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we slap a moonboot on him and call it season ending? Give us another pick in the mid season draft. 2 picks then, grab the best potential wingmen possible and chuck em in. What could it hurt?

I agree, he needs to sit in the coaches box, or even on the bench to get in the ears as players come off. Casey playing assistant coach next year, but he'll probably want to run back to the Hawks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DV8 said:

I haven't kept up with the kids for 4 or 5 years. and I don't know anything of this years bunch, at this time.

 

But I have been calling for us to recruit small forward rover types,  and midfield running types over at least the past 4 National Drafts.

Names of Ainsworth, Higgins, DeGoey, Stephenson, I was unsure of Petruccelle but he was an interest.  but more out and out speed at that time.

 

Back a few years prior to that,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  from that Weideman draft,  I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

I really wanted us to make sure we got Weideman... who I'll back all the way for us.  But i was hoping we could also pickup a Grundy as well,  Via some wheeling and dealing.

Sadly that did not happen

Honestly, you have lost the plot, they were drafted 3 years apart. Grundy was in the Toumpas draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Watts the matter said:

Honestly, you have lost the plot, they were drafted 3 years apart. Grundy was in the Toumpas draft.

I got confused in my text  sentencing.

 You can see what i was saying,  [ Back a few years prior to that,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  ]

 

1 hour ago, Watts the matter said:

I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

This was the truth and I wrote it at that time.  Sure it wasn't correct to say it was Weideman's draft year... which I was aware of,  but just wrote out the sentence incorrectly.

 

No, i have lost the plot at all  'Wtm'.   but you are acting out of frustration and anger.

But, I am struggling with seeing the screen well, and that does hinder my text & grammar occasionally.

 

 

1 hour ago, DV8 said:

Back a few years prior to that,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  from that Weideman draft,  I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

I really wanted us to make sure we got Weideman... who I'll back all the way for us.  But i was hoping we could also pickup a Grundy as well,  Via some wheeling and dealing.

Sadly that did not happen

I should have written it this way >>>

"Back a few years prior to that Weideman draft,,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

Edited by DV8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

You would love to know the reasoning, though.  Clearly Goody has something in mind, only we don't know what that is.  I can't see someone, who is clearly an intelligent coach, just sticking an old fella on a wing and hoping for the best.  I know that is what it looks like, but deep down we know that just isn't the case.

On the flip side, I think it's pretty evident that, whatever the plan was, they got it wrong and Lewis had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever.  I'd be very, very surprised to see him line up on a wing on Wednesday night.

Because the Saints half forwards - Kent, Parker, Long, Lonie all would've killed Lewis at half back and the backline - which was already slow with one plodding flanker in Josh Wagner -  did the job against the Swans.

The plan was he'd mostly be on Sinclair or Newnes on the wing, less speedy and more running accumulators. As long as we provided good forward pressure he only had to run with them not sprint with them.

Lewis and Jones were to run hard backwards and provide the backs with numbers and easy outlet options, then we'd play tempo footy. Stretch and Jones both did that against the Swans and Lewis only had to do similar to Stretch with better kicking (theoretically).

Clearly it failed, mainly because the MCG is far bigger and the Saints far quicker than the Swans, but if he played at half back in place of (?J Wagner ?Hibberd ?Fritsch) he still would've been found wanting speed and agility against the Saints quick forwards. Unless the forward and midfield pressure is top shelf and he has a slow and harmless opponent he's going to struggle.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


47 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Because the Saints half forwards - Kent, Parker, Long, Lonie all would've killed Lewis at half back and the backline - which was already slow with one plodding flanker in Josh Wagner -  did the job against the Swans.

The plan was he'd mostly be on Sinclair or Newnes on the wing, less speedy and more running accumulators. As long as we provided good forward pressure he only had to run with them not sprint with them.

Lewis and Jones were to run hard backwards and provide the backs with numbers and easy outlet options, then we'd play tempo footy. Stretch and Jones both did that against the Swans and Lewis only had to do similar to Stretch with better kicking (theoretically).

Clearly it failed, mainly because the MCG is far bigger and the Saints far quicker than the Swans, but if he played at half back in place of (?J Wagner ?Hibberd ?Fritsch) he still would've been found wanting speed and agility against the Saints quick forwards. Unless the forward and midfield pressure is top shelf and he has a slow and harmless opponent he's going to struggle.

 

The team is collectively, too slow.  So we cannot cover the spaces opening up around us. Our older players are more exposed.

 

If we start to play youngsters now,  I want Lewis out there directing and teaching them.

If we stay with our NQR senior players in the team,  then Lewis can come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jaded said:

Hard to put any faith in a coach who plays his two slowest and oldest players on the wings of the MCG against any team, let alone and quick one. 

What possible logic is behind this coaching move?

Coz he knows the season is already cooked and playing for early Draft Picks??

Only reason I can possibly find!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DV8 said:

I got confused in my text  sentencing.

 You can see what i was saying,  [ Back a few years prior to that,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  ]

 

This was the truth and I wrote it at that time.  Sure it wasn't correct to say it was Weideman's draft year... which I was aware of,  but just wrote out the sentence incorrectly.

 

No, i have lost the plot at all  'Wtm'.   but you are acting out of frustration and anger.

But, I am struggling with seeing the screen well, and that does hinder my text & grammar occasionally.

 

 

I should have written it this way >>>

"Back a few years prior to that Weideman draft,,  before Maxy extracted the digit...  I was also keen on Grundy.  Who I thought would make an Ideal mobile ruck type.

It was a bit tongue in cheek but I had just read a post of you comparing Wayne Carey and Sam Weideman and then this post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

Because the Saints half forwards - Kent, Parker, Long, Lonie all would've killed Lewis at half back and the backline - which was already slow with one plodding flanker in Josh Wagner -  did the job against the Swans.

The plan was he'd mostly be on Sinclair or Newnes on the wing, less speedy and more running accumulators. As long as we provided good forward pressure he only had to run with them not sprint with them.

Lewis and Jones were to run hard backwards and provide the backs with numbers and easy outlet options, then we'd play tempo footy. Stretch and Jones both did that against the Swans and Lewis only had to do similar to Stretch with better kicking (theoretically).

Clearly it failed, mainly because the MCG is far bigger and the Saints far quicker than the Swans, but if he played at half back in place of (?J Wagner ?Hibberd ?Fritsch) he still would've been found wanting speed and agility against the Saints quick forwards. Unless the forward and midfield pressure is top shelf and he has a slow and harmless opponent he's going to struggle.

 

Lewis only has a few limited assets left including his ability to read the play and intercept across HB, then feed off.  Goody would have been about the only official in the football that would have felt Lewis (and Jones) should be played off a wing (at the G).  Don't play him at all if he can't play his usual HB role in that case.

It was an amateur call as was the idea of putting Jones on the other wing.

By the times Lewis and Jones run "Hard" backwards the ball would already be rebounding (after having gone there already) and be sailing over their heads before they've gotten half way there.

It's the quickest part of the ground, you don't play your slowest through there.  Yet that's what our senior coach did from the get go. 

The Saints coaching group must have been laughing and licking their lips on seeing that set up at the first bounce but initially must have thought "settle boys....it's just a ploy....they won't continue with that one!".

Edited by Rusty Nails
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Watts the matter said:

It was a bit tongue in cheek but I had just read a post of you comparing Wayne Carey and Sam Weideman and then this post. 

I was comparing their development years...  in regard to which young Key Forward could single-handedly,  hold a forwardline together.

Obviously its impossible to compare Carey's finished career,  with Weide's start to his career. 

He's going to be a good one...  IF he maintains direction and strong attitude in his mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DV8 said:

I was comparing their development years...  in regard to which young Key Forward could single-handedly,  hold a forwardline together.

Obviously its impossible to compare Carey's finished career,  with Weide's start to his career. 

He's going to be a good one...  IF he maintains direction and strong attitude in his mind.

I know what you were doing I just fail to see why you would choose Carey of all players to compare him to. 

Hipwood, Curnow, McKay and Himmelberg are his draft class. They all have more strings to their bows and much better athletic capabilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

Lewis only has a few limited assets left including his ability to read the play and intercept across HB, then feed off.  Goody would have been about the only official in the football that would have felt Lewis (and Jones) should be played off a wing (at the G).  Don't play him at all if he can't play his usual HB role in that case.

It was an amateur call as was the idea of putting Jones on the other wing.

By the times Lewis and Jones run "Hard" backwards the ball would already be rebounding (after having gone there already) and be sailing over their heads before they've gotten half way there.

It's the quickest part of the ground, you don't play your slowest through there.  Yet that's what our senior coach did from the get go. 

The Saints coaching group must have been laughing and licking their lips on seeing that set up at the first bounce but initially must have thought "settle boys....it's just a ploy....they won't continue with that one!".

Disagree with some of that, half forward and half back are often the quickest part of the ground. If you're defending well the ground shrinks up in to lots of stoppages and little space on the wing.

Selwood is playing wing for the Cats. Isaac Smith is spending a lot of time at half forward to get in to more space for the Hawks.

For the quarter and a bit that we defended reasonably well Jones and Lewis weren't caught out for pace all that often. As soon as the forwards and mids dropped off they were torched, but so were our slow half backs. 

The thing I do agree with you on is don't play him if he can't play HB. I don't think he can, not alongside Josh Wagner and without a lot of pace with the other defenders. I think we can have 1 slower wing and still be a decent side: Jones or Lewis. And one slower half back: Lewis or Josh Wagner. If that player moves to the right spaces and gets a lot of uncontested ball then they are useful without speed.

And even then just as much of the mistake was playing Lewis without a warm up in the VFL. There was no chance for him to get some touch and prove he can bend down and get the ball, chase opponents and go in to tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 3

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    GOOD MORNING by Meggs

    If you are driving or training it to Cranbourne on Saturday, don’t forget to set your alarm clock. The Melbourne Demons play the reigning premiers Brisbane Lions at Casey Fields this Saturday, with the bounce of the ball at 11:05am.  Yes, that’s AM.   The AFLW fixture shows deference to the AFL men’s finals games.  So, for the men it’s good afternoon and good evening and for the women it’s good morning.     The Lions were wounded last week by 44 points, their highest ever los

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 3

    HORE ON FIRE by Meggs

    The 40,000 seat $319 million redeveloped Kardinia Park Stadium was nowhere near capacity last night but the strong, noisy contingent of Melbourne supporters led by the DeeArmy journeyed to Geelong to witness a high-quality battle between two of the best teams in AFLW.   The Cats entered the arena to the blasting sounds of Zombie Nation and made a hot start kicking the first 2 goals. They brought tremendous forward half pressure, and our newly renovated defensive unit looked shaky.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 11
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...