Jump to content

Next Six Weeks

Out of the next 6 games how many will we win? 230 members have voted

  1. 1. Out of the next 6 games how many will we win? Essendon (Etihad), Hawks (MCG), Crows (Adelaide), North (MCG), Suns (Alice Springs), Pies (MCG)

    • 6 - 0
      4
    • 5 - 1
      59
    • 4 - 2
      72
    • 3 - 3
      44
    • 2 - 4
      25
    • 1 - 5
      11
    • 0 - 6
      7

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

6 hours ago, A F said:

I see the original OD is back.

And you were so positive after the first two games...

And then reality set in.AF. 

After 50 years you would think I would have learn't .

The more things change the more they stay the same.

The end is nigh.

 
8 hours ago, old dee said:

And then reality set in.AF. 

After 50 years you would think I would have learn't .

The more things change the more they stay the same.

The end is nigh.

And when we go and win 4 or 5 games in a row at some stage this season, OD? What then? ;) I hope you come back and visit this post.

Just now, A F said:

And when we go and win 4 or 5 games in a row at some stage this season, OD? What then? ;) I hope you come back and visit this post.

In all fairness. When we win 5-6 on the trot it will be a DIFFERENT reality.

The current one precludes me from gazing past Sunday ;)

 
9 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

In all fairness. When we win 5-6 on the trot it will be a DIFFERENT reality.

The current one precludes me from gazing past Sunday ;)

My point is some of us need to be looking past last week and taking a holistic approach to the season and our upward trend and development. 

12 minutes ago, A F said:

And when we go and win 4 or 5 games in a row at some stage this season, OD? What then? ;) I hope you come back and visit this post.

Whoever wins, we lose.


13 minutes ago, A F said:

My point is some of us need to be looking past last week and taking a holistic approach to the season and our upward trend and development. 

We wont win 4 on the trot this year. Its a nice idea.

13 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

We wont win 4 on the trot this year. Its a nice idea.

I reckon we're a big chance to do it at some stage.

3 hours ago, A F said:

And when we go and win 4 or 5 games in a row at some stage this season, OD? What then? ;) I hope you come back and visit this post.

I live for the year that we win 4-5 in a row A F.

That sounds like navarna in a Premiership year. 

No chance in 2017 with our injury list.

In fact we would have only done it a few times in the last 50 years so I think the odds at stacked against it in 2017.

 
2 hours ago, A F said:

I reckon we're a big chance to do it at some stage.

Any idea when?

3 hours ago, A F said:

My point is some of us need to be looking past last week and taking a holistic approach to the season and our upward trend and development. 

Last week A F? We have three on the row.


25 minutes ago, old dee said:

Any idea when?

As I say, some stage. Not sure. But I suspect later in the year, when we hit our straps, adjust to the systems we've been taught over the pre season and Goody (and co) have tweaked a few things defensively that are hurting us now. And we get Max back.

23 minutes ago, old dee said:

Last week A F? We have three on the row.

Is a five round sample an holistic approach to a 23 round season, OD?

7 minutes ago, A F said:

As I say, some stage. Not sure. But I suspect later in the year, when we hit our straps, adjust to the systems we've been taught over the pre season and Goody (and co) have tweaked a few things defensively that are hurting us now. And we get Max back.

Is a five round sample an holistic approach to a 23 round season, OD?

I was saying it was more than just last week A F we have lost three in a row. Two of them to ordinary teams and fell in against the Blues who will finish in the last three. We are not four in a row winners any time soon.

I hope Adelaide is 7-0 when we go there. I think they're bigger campaigners than Richmond tbh. 

5 minutes ago, praha said:

I hope Adelaide is 7-0 when we go there. I think they're bigger campaigners than Richmond tbh. 

If Adelaide isn’t the real deal this year, then who is?


3 minutes ago, Chook said:

If Adelaide isn’t the real deal this year, then who is?

No one atm. Anyone can beat anyone. Pies smashing Cats atm. Last year we saw Bulldogs win from 7th. 

24 minutes ago, praha said:

No one atm. Anyone can beat anyone. Pies smashing Cats atm. Last year we saw Bulldogs win from 7th. 

From my point of view there are two standout teams 

the crows and giants 

then a second group of 

power, tigers, cats, dogs 

and fighting for two spots in the 8 are 

Melbourne, saints, eagles, bombers, dockers

35 minutes ago, Abe said:

From my point of view there are two standout teams 

the crows and giants 

then a second group of 

power, tigers, cats, dogs 

and fighting for two spots in the 8 are 

Melbourne, saints, eagles, bombers, dockers

 

We dominated two of those second group teams.... that's the way the ladder might play out but we are a better team than both Geelong and the tigers 

18 minutes ago, Wolfmother said:

 

We dominated two of those second group teams.... that's the way the ladder might play out but we are a better team than both Geelong and the tigers 

Not until we beat them pulling away can you say that. 

Thus far we have improved...

After round 2 I had us honestly at 9-1 before the bye. Now, I'd accept parity. Dons (already won), Hawks, Suns shouldn't provide too much opposition. Might lose one. Crows will slaughter us over there. North aren't that bad, and Pies just showed they can play well when they kick straight, and have the midfield to get on top of us without Gawn.

Second half of the season though. That's where we sort the men from the boys. Very tough.


Adelaide is the only one of those games that I don't think we can win (I don't see us getting close to them, but that says more about them than us).

Our best shot at finals requires us to beat all of Hawthorn, Gold Coast and North before the bye, and then Collingwood on QBD after it, to put us 7-4 before the back-to-back-to-back six day breaks set in.

It is critical that we win against Hawthorn next week.  Essendon play Freo...one of them moves to 16 points. Port play WCE...one of them moves to 20 points.  Bulldogs play Richmond and hopefully win....but it means both of them on 20 points.

We cannot afford to be stuck on 12 and a game out of the 8. 

Am I the only one that thinks we can take it up to Adelaide?

They are playing unbelievable football but I'm not convinced they are invincible. 

They have beaten:  GWS, Haw, P.A. Ess. GC. Rich. The 3 top 6 teams have in turn beaten:

  • GWS:  GC. NM. Port. Syd. WB.
  • Port:  Syd. Freo. Carlton. Brisb.
  • Rich:  Carl. Coll. WC. BL. Dees.

A lot of bottom 6 teams among the beaten. 

I'm not saying we will win but I'm not ready to notch it up as a loss, either.  If we bring our A game we will give it a damn good go.

 
6 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Am I the only one that thinks we can take it up to Adelaide?

They are playing unbelievable football but I'm not convinced they are invincible. 

They have beaten:  GWS, Haw, P.A. Ess. GC. Rich. The 3 top 6 teams have in turn beaten:

  • GWS:  GC. NM. Port. Syd. WB.
  • Port:  Syd. Freo. Carlton. Brisb.
  • Rich:  Carl. Coll. WC. BL. Dees.

A lot of bottom 6 teams among the beaten. 

I'm not saying we will win but I'm not ready to notch it up as a loss, either.  If we bring our A game we will give it a damn good go.

Biggest concern is that Pedders will face his first real test vs Sam Jacobs.

We will concede the hitouts by a huge margin in that game, and Jacobs knows how to hit to advantage.

18 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Biggest concern is that Pedders will face his first real test vs Sam Jacobs.

We will concede the hitouts by a huge margin in that game, and Jacobs knows how to hit to advantage.

Today we lost the hitouts but won the clearances fairly convincingly but agree Jacobs is another story.  Our midfield needs to continue their good work reading the op ruckmen. 

I think we are going to challenge teams simply because our structure now is unconventional and it will take them by surprise a bit.  I'm optimistic on how we match up vs Adelaide.   It will be a terrific game and a lot closer than some think.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 104 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies