Jump to content

2017 Clash Guernsey

2017 Clash Guernsey 194 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think of the 2017 Clash Guernsey?

    • Love it!
      24
    • Hate it!
      132
    • Don't care!
      28

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, iv'a worn smith said:

It is not simply a question of it being 'white', the overall design just stinks.

Having said on numerous occasions I don't mind the white jumper this is certainly not their finest hour.

 
1 hour ago, old dee said:

This argument has been going on for years dc and the "Red Designers " are no closer that they were 10 years ago.

The problem for the RD's is the MFC and the AFL settled this years ago and while the MFC are beholding to the MFC for finance nothing will change.

Raise it after we have won three flags in a row and have 60 000 members. Until then it will not do a "Trump" or anything similar.

if you are not up to the fight, then step aside and get out of the way, od :lol:

1 minute ago, daisycutter said:

if you are not up to the fight, then step aside and get out of the way, od :lol:

I am not standing in your way dc.

I am just pointing out the folly in the effort.

King Canute comes to mind.

 
2 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

if you are not up to the fight, then step aside and get out of the way, od :lol:

Well said. Those who just accept the white jumper will get it  

Those who find the whole "white jumper" scenario offensive considering not all have to wear them, have to keep fighting. 

But we need to engage the club and members...

2 hours ago, AzzKikA said:

 

 

I sent them the following:

Good Afternoon,

 

While I am sure you have received a number of emails relating to the 2017 clash Guernsey, I felt it necessary to also provide some feedback. I do not expect an email back, however as a paying member of the Melbourne Football Club I felt it necessary to voice my opinion on what I think is a really poor effort in the production of the 2017 clash Guernsey.

 

I understand that the AFL sets certain guidelines for the types of clash Guernsey’s required, but I feel that this years’ is an extremely lazy effort at constructing a clash strip. I actually don’t mind the idea of having different strips as it presents a great commercial opportunity to sell more merchandise to fans. However, I can  honestly say this is one of the worst attempts I have seen from any club in the AFL (including the Hawks Power Rangers effort!). It seems as though someone has just taken a white Guernsey (because we have to) and just decided to slap the emblem on there as they couldn’t be bothered thinking of anything better to do. The only thing I can think of that resembles this would be a cheap knock off singlet you would buy on the streets of Bali!

 

While I understand that you will be unable to change the strip for the 2017 season, I do have some recommendations for future seasons.

 

1.       We should look at involving the members in decisions on the alternate strip (as we are the ones who will be buying them). This could be done with a ‘create the guernsey’ competition or you could provide 3 options and let people vote.

2.       We should look at only have a red clash strip. The Bomber’s colours are not too dissimilar to ours and they are able to have a red clash strip so why not us?

3.       I have attached a concept for clash strips produced by another MFC member that I think would be much better options. The main reason is that they would both contain the red ‘V’ which I feel is synonymous with the Melbourne Football Club brand.

 

I appreciate you taking the time to read this email and I hope that it does not fall on deaf ears. As mentioned I do not expect an email back but I just hope that the club will accept the feedback from the people who pay money to this club and who purchase your merchandise.


1 minute ago, old dee said:

I am not standing in your way dc.

I am just pointing out the folly in the effort.

King Canute comes to mind.

but od, you just repeat yourself with the same defeatist statements

you have said a number of times you don't care what colour jumper we play in (you are the only one who says this) , so you have no objections to  a red or red/blue only clash jumper. your only argument against such a clash jumper is that we can't beat city hall purely because we don't have the power or privilege of a club like essendon who can seemingly break the so-called rules.

we get your pov, but it doesn't add anything to the argument beyond saying it is just too hard. so is a flag, so is a lot of things, but they are not impossible or insurmountable

1 minute ago, daisycutter said:

but od, you just repeat yourself with the same defeatist statements

you have said a number of times you don't care what colour jumper we play in (you are the only one who says this) , so you have no objections to  a red or red/blue only clash jumper. your only argument against such a clash jumper is that we can't beat city hall purely because we don't have the power or privilege of a club like essendon who can seemingly break the so-called rules.

we get your pov, but it doesn't add anything to the argument beyond saying it is just too hard. so is a flag, so is a lot of things, but they are not impossible or insurmountable

Some things are dc

1 hour ago, stuie said:

There's 18 sets of colours to deal with, so the AFL are trying to balance it all out.

That's why.

 

balance what out ?...this speaks of a nonsense.  A clash is relevant to the two teams playing on the day, that is all. What does it matter  what other teams play in , or not at any other ground ?

 
10 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

balance what out ?...this speaks of a nonsense.  A clash is relevant to the two teams playing on the day, that is all. What does it matter  what other teams play in , or not at any other ground ?

Got it in one, BB!!


Hey, I've got an idea.  Make the umpires wear all white.  That would be novel, wouldn't it?  The number of times i've seen their 'pyjamas' cause confusion on the ground for players is many

9k=   2Q==

3 minutes ago, ManDee said:

   hideous images removed

naughty corner....off you go !!!  ^_^

It really should be very easy. For clubs that don't clash witht he predominantly blue jumper of our traditional strip then we should be wearing that. That would be most clubs I would think. For clubs that do clash with the traditional strip (Blues, Dogs, Maybe Adelaide and West Coast) then we wear our alternate strip. The alternate strip could be as simple as reversing the blue and red, surely if you clash with Dark Blue then you don't with red!


12 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

naughty corner....off you go !!!  ^_^

Thanks beeb, although hideous are they any worse than the official jersey? They are at least still red & blue, and I would think be a viable alternate strip.

7 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Thanks beeb, although hideous are they any worse than the official jersey? They are at least still red & blue, and I would think be a viable alternate strip.

Pink and Aqua more like it ManDee. :rolleyes:

They almost make the pajamas look decent.....almost.

Not a mad fan of this new design though

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

balance what out ?...this speaks of a nonsense.  A clash is relevant to the two teams playing on the day, that is all. What does it matter  what other teams play in , or not at any other ground ?

Balance out the fact that a lot of teams have red, hence why some teams need to have a white clash guernsey.

Not that hard to understand really.

You don't see how us wearing a red jumper doesn't help much if we play Essendon who have a big red sash?

 

7 minutes ago, stuie said:

Balance out the fact that a lot of teams have red, hence why some teams need to have a white clash guernsey.

Not that hard to understand really.

You don't see how us wearing a red jumper doesn't help much if we play Essendon who have a big red sash?

 

And what about when we eventually host Essendon? Why is okay for them to wear a red clash strip against us, but we can't against them? That doesn't make sense. Did you notice that Gold Coast wore its red uniform against Essendon and St Kilda last season. Nothing was said about it.

1 minute ago, Swooper Northey said:

And what about when we eventually host Essendon? Why is okay for them to wear a red clash strip against us, but we can't against them? That doesn't make sense. Did you notice that Gold Coast wore its red uniform against Essendon and St Kilda last season. Nothing was said about it.

Red and yellow is a lot different to red and dark blue when comparing to red and black. St Kilda have barely any red so don't see why that would be a problem either.

You're right about us hosting Essendon though.

 


Surely one of the key criteria from the clubs perspective would be Demon shop sales.

I think revenue's gonna be down this year.

12 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Surely one of the key criteria from the clubs perspective would be Demon shop sales.

I think revenue's gonna be down this year.

Weird fact, but one of the things the club has said in the past is most of the time the "uglier" merch sells the best...

 

29 minutes ago, stuie said:

Weird fact, but one of the things the club has said in the past is most of the time the "uglier" merch sells the best...

So, record profits forecast for the Demon Shop this coming year, then...!

 
1 hour ago, stuie said:

Balance out the fact that a lot of teams have red, hence why some teams need to have a white clash guernsey.

Not that hard to understand really.

You don't see how us wearing a red jumper doesn't help much if we play Essendon who have a big red sash?

 

Why can't we simply where our normal jumper against the dons? There is no clash there. 

5 minutes ago, Chris said:

Why can't we simply where our normal jumper against the dons? There is no clash there. 

That's right!  Muck up this thread with a perfectly sensible suggestion!  Stone him, I say!!


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 84 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 35 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Sad
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 332 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Hawthorn

    After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thumb Down
      • Like
    • 32 replies
    Demonland