Jump to content

Michael Hurley

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

Im not sure this is such a good thing. In a way it makes it harder for Hurley to walk . It mean his old club, which he is bound to feel some allegience to, will get nada if he goes. A fcat, that should he go, would be bound to cost him friendships. If he's angry enough and wants to go then great but if he's waivering then this set up would probably lean him into staying. 

He'd be leaving because he's [censored] off at the club, so that should cancel any allegiance to them out.

 
On 6/25/2016 at 2:31 PM, AdamPleb said:

He'd be leaving because he's [censored] off at the club, so that should cancel any allegiance to them out.

I can't understand why a serious AFL footballer would re-sign with a club that wronged them so badly. i know some have been offered insane dollars but outside that there is no carrot, they're going to have to totally re-build 

14 minutes ago, Abe said:

I can't understand why a serious AFL footballer would re-sign with a club that wronged them so badly. 

Stockholm syndrome...

 
1 hour ago, Abe said:

I can't understand why a serious AFL footballer would re-sign with a club that wronged them so badly.

Yeah, not unless they understood and were fully complicit to the program and substances they were injecting.

I wouldn't be surprised if the whole dragging it out with the remaining players is just another part of the charade.

I think sometimes we overestimate a player's loyalty to a club. Players are loyal to their mates. If Hurley stays at Essendon it will be to play with his mates, some of whom went through the same horrid [censored] as him. 


there's mateship...and then there's stupidity

Mates who are stupid are

lemmings-off-the-cliff-o.gif

3 hours ago, Abe said:

I can't understand why a serious AFL footballer would re-sign with a club that wronged them so badly. i know some have been offered insane dollars but outside that there is no carrot, they're going to have to totally re-build 

Hint: it has a lot to do with "compensation payments" via lawsuit from the club directly to players that, conveniently enough, don't go under the salary cap. Said compo payments would be substantially higher for players that agree to stay with the club, as an incentive. Let's not forget Essendon are rolling in money with benefactors with fat bank accounts. Money buys anything in this day and age, even loyalty.

Of course, the AFL are turning a blind eye to such shenanigans. Won't even step in to prevent pick 1 going to them, despite the circumstances. Poor old "Everything By Committee" Gillon, starting to remind me of another Gil:

latest?cb=20110424073902

Edited by SaberFang

Saber dare say Windy Hill have reinvented the brown paper bag.

Might well sway some

 
12 hours ago, brendan said:

If we can get him for just money then get it done dees, we play finals if he was in our side now 

That, as ludicrious as it reads, is a very simple but accurate assessment. Certainly for the back half of the year anyway. Our defense needs shoring up and may have helped us in certain games this year.

Anyone hear David King rabbit on about about how Essendon could in the window for the next 3 years? Wtf. He said they should trade pick one and trade for  a star and they would push for top 4

what is he smoking??

next year at best they will be in the group outside the eight on 8-10 wins


3 hours ago, SaberFang said:

Hint: it has a lot to do with "compensation payments" via lawsuit from the club directly to players that, conveniently enough, don't go under the salary cap. Said compo payments would be substantially higher for players that agree to stay with the club, as an incentive. Let's not forget Essendon are rolling in money with benefactors with fat bank accounts. Money buys anything in this day and age, even loyalty.

Of course, the AFL are turning a blind eye to such shenanigans. Won't even step in to prevent pick 1 going to them, despite the circumstances. Poor old "Everything By Committee" Gillon, starting to remind me of another Gil:

latest?cb=20110424073902

Sad but true.

11 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Anyone hear David King rabbit on about about how Essendon could in the window for the next 3 years? Wtf. He said they should trade pick one and trade for  a star and they would push for top 4

what is he smoking??

next year at best they will be in the group outside the eight on 8-10 wins

King is constantly making bold (stupid) predictions in an attempt to make an 'I told you so' name for himself. 

10 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

King is constantly making bold (stupid) predictions in an attempt to make an 'I told you so' name for himself. 

Yes.

I reckon he will change it to David Nostradamus .

Just to show off.

14 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

King is constantly making bold (stupid) predictions in an attempt to make an 'I told you so' name for himself. 

The same guy who had Saints not winning a game last year and Richmond top 4 this year, Freo premiers, Adelaide and Dogs to slide.

He will get something right form time to time but his team predictions have been poor...

On 15 June 2016 at 5:16 PM, H_T said:

I'm sure training as a group would be beneficial for him. I'm sure his angst wouldn't have been with the players. 

Until he signs something IMO there is no significant development.

Except he's contracted at EFC next year, which means he simply has to turn up, train and then play next year.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 110 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 30 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 313 replies