Jump to content

2016 is a big year for ...

old55
old55
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

  On 03/12/2015 at 05:36, ProDee said:

I will never forget this poster. 

hahaha... you must lead a pretty happening life.

  • Quote
    •  
      On 01/12/2015 at 03:31, billy2803 said:

    I was going to say JKH, to see if he can consolidate a spot in our best 22. But I've changed my mind, and think 2016 is going to be a big year for...

    Max Gawn.

    Many would consider 2015 a break out year for Maxy, but I'm not sold yet. He showed he has the ability to play at the top level at various stages, but now I want to see him do it for 22+ games in a season. I want to be assured that he has the desire to not be out of place if mentioned in the same breath as Goldstein. I want him to prove that he has both feet heavily planted on the ground, and is willing to make any personal sacrifice to give himself the best opportunity to be one of the best rucks in the league.

    2016 will show me if Max is content with being the number 1 ruck at Melbourne, or if he has the drive to be the best in the league.

    It's over to you, Max.

    I agree that Maxie will play a massive part in our fortunes for next year however (unlike you) I don't want him to "prove that he has both feet heavily planted on the ground"! I want to see him soaring into the air taking pack marks above the opposition ruckmen!

  • Quote
    •  
      On 02/12/2015 at 23:38, WAClark said:

    I have no problem with Watts.

    Sure, he's not the world-beater we wanted when we drafted him, but I still think he's a valuable contributor.

    I think there's a little too much focus on the aesthetic with Jack Watts. He doesn't throw his body around as much as others, but he finds a way to win his fair share of contests by being smart and nimble.

    For all the talk about Hawthorn's small/medium forwards, I'd still take Watts over either Gunston or Breust, who perform well as cherry-pickers in a proven and effective system. Watts is more flexible and has shown something in a system that has proven to be ineffective.

    You have rocks in your head.

  • Quote
      On 02/12/2015 at 23:38, WAClark said:

    I have no problem with Watts.

    Sure, he's not the world-beater we wanted when we drafted him, but I still think he's a valuable contributor.

    I think there's a little too much focus on the aesthetic with Jack Watts. He doesn't throw his body around as much as others, but he finds a way to win his fair share of contests by being smart and nimble.

    For all the talk about Hawthorn's small/medium forwards, I'd still take Watts over either Gunston or Breust, who perform well as cherry-pickers in a proven and effective system. Watts is more flexible and has shown something in a system that has proven to be ineffective.

    Wow, just wow.

  • Quote

      On 06/12/2015 at 00:22, dazzledavey36 said:

    You have rocks in your head.

    Cheers.

  • Quote
      On 05/12/2015 at 06:40, Redleg said:

    Jack Watts is my big improver for 2016.

    What aspects of his game will improve?

    What aspects of his game do you think need improvement?

  • Quote

    Salem for me. Reckon he is going to be an absolute gun for us this year.

    Also can't wait to see Frost in action again. Big unit and so quick. 

    Bring on 2016. Fingers crossed for no injuries.

  • Quote
    •  
      On 06/12/2015 at 00:22, dazzledavey36 said:

    You have rocks in your head.

    A sterling rebuttal. For what it's worth I agree, Jack creates play in a way that neither of the other two are even capable of

  • Quote

      On 06/12/2015 at 08:44, MrReims said:

    A sterling rebuttal. For what it's worth I agree, Jack creates play in a way that neither of the other two are even capable of

    Yeah he's very good at confusing his opponent into thinking he'll take a mark, but instead he'll cleverly duck his head and drop the mark so our crumbers can take off with the ball. The man is a genius!

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 09:05, Wormburner said:

    Yeah he's very good at confusing his opponent into thinking he'll take a mark, but instead he'll cleverly duck his head and drop the mark so our crumbers can take off with the ball. The man is a genius!

    The thing that annoys me with this, whilst I am willing to admit it has happened, is the fact other players have been seen to do the same thing, but it is allowed to slide under the radar. Patrick Cripps, who will be an absolute gun, was a victim of a similar head ducking last year resulting in a turn over and goal, yet did the media make the issue as big as when Watts happened to do it, not at all.

    Watts is unlucky that both opposition and Melbourne supporters and the media scrutinise him more than any other player in the league.

    Im most optimistic this season about Jayden Hunt, he provides something that our side lacked last year. Whilst Kent and Frost both add this speed to the side, with a good run with injuries Hunt could show why their is faith in him and why Roos has high faith in him.

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 21:51, Mad_Melbourne said:

    Im most optimistic this season about Jayden Hunt, he provides something that our side lacked last year.

    Won't happen.  He has no tank and while he has no tank I can't see him getting a game.  I don't think he can improve it to satisfactory levels by the start of the season.

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 22:36, ProDee said:

    Won't happen.  He has no tank and while he has no tank I can't see him getting a game.  I don't think he can improve it to satisfactory levels by the start of the season.

    He had had injuries.........So a player can't build a tank over a pre season????

    How about we give him a chance and see how he goes?

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 22:43, Bossdog said:

    He had had injuries.........So a player can't build a tank over a pre season????

    How about we give him a chance and see how he goes?

    OK then.  Let him know I'm prepared to give him a go.

  • Quote

      On 06/12/2015 at 22:36, ProDee said:

    Won't happen.  He has no tank and while he has no tank I can't see him getting a game.  I don't think he can improve it to satisfactory levels by the start of the season.

    Agree. He has not shown anything remotely close to suggest he will be a good ordinary player. I understand the injuries he has picked over the years has stunted his development but he is a fair way behind majority of the list.

    While i was happy with most of the list changes over the trade period the one that was an utterly stupid decision was putting Viv michie on the rookie list instead of Hunt.. Viv has shown to be a handy midfield depth while hunt has shown he struggles to win more then 7 disposals a game at VFL level. 

    Only time will tell..

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 22:36, ProDee said:

    Won't happen.  He has no tank and while he has no tank I can't see him getting a game.  I don't think he can improve it to satisfactory levels by the start of the season.

    Players have their deficiencies, its hard to put together a really solid tank when he has been spending most of the last two seasons on the sidelines.

    I dont think he will play 22 AFL games this year, but really hoping he can put together a season of 15 vfl games and 5-7 Afl games. Has reasonable finishing ability on top of his breakaway speed and these are skills that can translate to AFL level

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 22:47, Mad_Melbourne said:

    Players have their deficiencies, its hard to put together a really solid tank when he has been spending most of the last two seasons on the sidelines.

    I dont think he will play 22 AFL games this year, but really hoping he can put together a season of 15 vfl games and 5-7 Afl games. Has reasonable finishing ability on top of his breakaway speed and these are skills that can translate to AFL level

    Ben Kennedy is renowned for his poor endurance.  It's one of the reasons Collingwood let him go.  At training Kennedy was noticeably poor in his running in the same group as Hogan, Hunt, and Watts.  Hogan was beating him by 70 metres in the final lap sessions.  Watts easily had his measure.  Hunt was a fair way behind Kennedy.  That puts into perspective how poor Hunt's endurance is and how far he's coming back from.  Can he get to "satisfactory" levels without the sub by the season proper ?  I don't think so.

    Btw, I'm not making any assertions as to why his endurance is poor.  It could be injury or just not being a great aerobic athlete.  I'm merely making the observation.  Although, I suspect the latter, as he's a good sprinter and the combination of speed and endurance is rare.  

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 22:53, ProDee said:

    Ben Kennedy is renowned for his poor endurance.  It's one of the reasons Collingwood let him go.  At training Kennedy was noticeably poor in his running in the same group as Hogan, Hunt, and Watts.  Hogan was beating him by 70 metres in the final lap sessions.  Watts easily had his measure.  Hunt was a fair way behind Kennedy.  That puts into perspective how poor Hunt's endurance is and how far he's coming back from.  Can he get to "satisfactory" levels without the sub by the season proper ?  I don't think so.

    Btw, I'm not making any assertions as to why his endurance is poor.  It could be injury or just not being a great aerobic athlete.  I'm merely making the observation.  Although, I suspect the latter, as he's a good sprinter and the combination of speed and endurance is rare.  

    I'm not disagreeing with his poor aerobic capacity, but these things can be worked on. Whilst he is working from a long way back, the things that he can bring to our side are things that we lack and therefore that is the main reason the club will have stuck with him and give him the one year extension. He definitely needs to string together a full pre season and a run of games without injury to put his name into contention, but I am optimistic that he adds something and if he can do so will be pushing his name up for selection.

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 23:00, Mad_Melbourne said:

    I'm not disagreeing with his poor aerobic capacity, but these things can be worked on. Whilst he is working from a long way back, the things that he can bring to our side are things that we lack and therefore that is the main reason the club will have stuck with him and give him the one year extension. He definitely needs to string together a full pre season and a run of games without injury to put his name into contention, but I am optimistic that he adds something and if he can do so will be pushing his name up for selection.

    Roos wants runners.  He's always talking about runners.  It's more so with less rotations and no sub.  Hunt is too far back to get games in 2016 (imho).

    We'll find out soon enough.

  • Quote

      On 06/12/2015 at 23:02, ProDee said:

    Roos wants runners.  He's always talking about runners.  It's more so with less rotations and no sub.  Hunt is too far back to get games in 2016 (imho).

    We'll find out soon enough.

    if this was Roos opinion of him, then surely he would have been delisted rather than offered a 1 year contract?

     

    im not disagreeing with the fact that he does want runners, but why would the club as a whole offer him an extra year when he was out of contract and could easily have delisted him and offered the spot to another player in the draft or even viv michie?

      On 06/12/2015 at 22:45, dazzledavey36 said:

    Agree. He has not shown anything remotely close to suggest he will be a good ordinary player. I understand the injuries he has picked over the years has stunted his development but he is a fair way behind majority of the list.

    While i was happy with most of the list changes over the trade period the one that was an utterly stupid decision was putting Viv michie on the rookie list instead of Hunt.. Viv has shown to be a handy midfield depth while hunt has shown he struggles to win more then 7 disposals a game at VFL level. 

    Only time will tell..

    This is true, his disposal count is really poor for VFL, but he also was able to find the goals quite often and was able to often exploit the space behind the zone, which is a really handy asset that we have seen Jeffy do quite often this year.

    The stats per game for him are often skewed also due to the fact that he was coming back from injury and working on his game time, that being said he would want to find more of the football and increase his pressure acts in order to push for a spot.

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 23:09, Mad_Melbourne said:

    if this was Roos opinion of him, then surely he would have been delisted rather than offered a 1 year contract?

    They see the X factor and talent we all see and are prepared to see how it ferments over the next 12 months.  And yes, take it to the bank that Roos is huge on "runners".  Jack Viney isn't a runner, but he has willed himself to be a satisfactory runner.

    We have 40 players on our primary list.  Where do you think Hunt currently ranks ?  I'm guessing it's 40.  (yes, he's still behind the Terlichs of this world)

    So when you say "why is he still on the list" ?  He's a hairs breadth from not being.  But with a list of 40 plus rookies it's not an unreasonable gamble when you've got to know the player.

  • Quote
      On 06/12/2015 at 23:29, ProDee said:

    They see the X factor and talent we all see and are prepared to see how it ferments over the next 12 months.  And yes, take it to the bank that Roos is huge on "runners".  Jack Viney isn't a runner, but he has willed himself to be a satisfactory runner.

    We have 40 players on our primary list.  Where do you think Hunt currently ranks ?  I'm guessing it's 40.  (yes, he's still behind the Terlichs of this world)

    So when you say "why is he still on the list" ?  He's a hairs breadth from not being.  But with a list of 40 plus rookies it's not an unreasonable gamble when you've got to know the player.

    This debate keeps drawing further and further away from my point, my statement was that I was optimistic, whilst I acknowledge his weaknesses, I see the aspects that he can bring to the side as the main reason he has stayed on the list and if he is able to combine this with a full pre season and consistent form in the VFL he will play AFL games this year. I also think it is a big year for him, for the obvious reasons that he is being given one last chance. So in relation to your quote, the club is optimistic about what he can offer to the side and therefore that warrants the extra year?

    Do i rank him in our top 30, no, but Roos and co have a knack of playing players based on form and was able to play a large chunk of the side next year.

     

    Sometimes I think you just like to type, because alot of what you are saying is in support of my initial statements but laced with a condescending and negative tone.

  • Quote
    •  

    Like many others I believe Salem is going to be exciting to watch this year and I expect a top 5 result in the B & F.

    It may be just hope, but I also expect a much better year from H.  He is a lot better than he showed us this year.  Maybe it was his feet (he had surgery of both ankles recently) and with this rectified he will regain pace, agility and confidence. 

    P,S.  Not sure about the new look demonland - putting my avatar in a bubble strips it of all its dignity.

  • Quote
      On 07/12/2015 at 00:05, Mad_Melbourne said:

    This debate keeps drawing further and further away from my point, my statement was that I was optimistic, whilst I acknowledge his weaknesses, I see the aspects that he can bring to the side as the main reason he has stayed on the list and if he is able to combine this with a full pre season and consistent form in the VFL he will play AFL games this year. I also think it is a big year for him, for the obvious reasons that he is being given one last chance. So in relation to your quote, the club is optimistic about what he can offer to the side and therefore that warrants the extra year?

    Do i rank him in our top 30, no, but Roos and co have a knack of playing players based on form and was able to play a large chunk of the side next year.

     

    Sometimes I think you just like to type, because alot of what you are saying is in support of my initial statements but laced with a condescending and negative tone.

    His endurance won't get to the point where he's a viable option to get games next year, imho.

     

    You disagree ?  Fantastic.

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: West Coast

      Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 08

      Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

        • Like
      • 51 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: West Coast

      The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 436 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Richmond

      The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Richmond

      The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Richmond

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 28th April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons 2nd win for the year against the Tigers.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/
      Call: 03 9016 3666
      Skype: Demonland31

        • Like
      • 29 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All