Why does anyone believe anything that they hear/read in the media ... or on forums?

I suppose that is what I'm trying to get at. What is the point of his constant statements about it? Adelaide won't change tact or strategy just because of his whining.

Campaigning for the future removal of the restricted form of FA.

He's not working in Danger's best interests now, he's thinking of easing the movement of other clients in future.

Just bums (paying) on seats, aren't we....

Talking about Parker now....

Apparently moves have been made towards Parker but he has no interest in leaving the Swans.

Looking at staying at Sydney with the possibility of signing a contract extension before the end of next year.

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

I'd probably rather keep Tyson if that were their offer.

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

Oh dear..

Connors is such a [censored], imploring Adelaide to accept the compensation and let Dangerfield go.

Just let the clubs handle it.

i don't understand his attitude

client is rfa and adelaide perfectly within their rights to match offer......them's the rules

what happens then is a diiferent scenario and really outside of fa. it is essentially back to the old ooc status

to avoid the matching offer the cats could always up their offer....that's their choice and it is a market, but they want their cake and eat it

it would also suit connors to get more loot for his client (commission)

anyway i'm sure crows aren't taking advice from connors. it's between carlton and crows i'd say

Why do people think up trade scenarios?

Edited October 17, 20159 yr by Clint Bizkit

What about Craig Bird? Is Bird the word?

Talking about Parker now....

Appearently moves have been made towards Parker but he has no interest in leaving the Swans.

Looking at staying at Sydney with the possibility of signing a contract extension before the end of next year.

Why do people up trade scenarios?

I presume the missing word is dream. If so I ask the same question each year. Different strokes and all that and I applaud the effort to hypothesise deals that are out of all but the club's control, but I don't get it either.

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

What is it with your bizarre obsession with wanting to recruit players not good enough to get games at their current side?

Why do people up trade scenarios?

However if the missing word is [censored], or in trade parlance pedergrassed, then I guess the answer is humans are fallible

Talking about Parker now....

Apparently moves have been made towards Parker but he has no interest in leaving the Swans.

Looking at staying at Sydney with the possibility of signing a contract extension before the end of next year.

Sounds like a job for Petraccattack.

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

No... we are not improving our list with that trade.

Griffiths is a fringe 22 player at best for the Tigers and would not be an upgrade on Dawes or Pederson.

While Pick 12 in this shallow draft is unlikely to net you a player close to Tyson's ability.

Why would we entertain a trade for a player who in 2 years has finished 2nd (2014) and 13th (2015) in our B&F.

Was clearly struggling with injury in 2015 as well.

Just bums (paying) on seats, aren't we....

Yeah cheap seats

If the Tigers want Tyson they can give us Pick 12 & Griffiths. Otherwsie not interested.

Go back to sleep mate

What is it with your bizarre obsession with wanting to recruit players not good enough to get games at their current side?

I'm assuming by players not good enough to get a regular game, you mean players who played 16 games this year and the games he missed mainly being due to injury?

No... we are not improving our list with that trade.

Griffiths is a fringe 22 player at best for the Tigers and would not be an upgrade on Dawes or Pederson.

While Pick 12 in this shallow draft is unlikely to net you a player close to Tyson's ability.

Why would we entertain a trade for a player who in 2 years has finished 2nd (2014) and 13th (2015) in our B&F.

Was clearly struggling with injury in 2015 as well.

Firstly I'd be thrilled if the whole Tyson being traded thing goes nowhere. Love him and would rather he stay.

But disgree that the scenario does not improve the list. Griffiths fills the 2nd key forward/ruck role that we're after. Turning 25 next year and getting ready to hit his straps. Watch his first quarter and a half against us in Round 4 this year before he hurt his ankle. Was looking extremely dangerous and I reckon is due for a big 2016. Then at Pick 12 we could potentially pick up someone like Balic, Tucker, Bonner etc.

On the other hand as I said, I'm more then keen to have Dom stay and watch him recapture his 2014 form next year.

Edited October 6, 201510 yr by AngryAtCasey

I'm assuming by players not good enough to get a regular game, you mean players who played 16 games this year and the games he missed mainly being due to injury?

He's now been in the system for 6 years and has played as a key forward the entire time with occasional stints in the ruck.

Not once in those 6 years has he even averaged a goal a game.

Set your sights higher.

NAB Trade Radio News - Tuesday October 6, 2015

Coming up today:

2pm: Damian Barrett and Terry Wallace round out the day with all of the latest potential deals, with Melbourne's Josh Mahoney joining the program for an update from the Demons.

Any one listen? Any info on what was said would be appreciated.

Any one listen? Any info on what was said would be appreciated.

Now on at 3.30, wish I'd known that before sitting through over an hour of Barrett and Wallace. Kill me

Did anyone hear Plough's mini review?

Did anyone hear Plough's mini review?

Yes.

Josh Mahoney coming on shortly. Will be providing a summary of the chat.